Beckham shunted from Team GB squad

David Beckham was sensationally shunted out of a place on the Olympic football team, decided by Team GB boss, and manager of Manchester City, Stuart, now dubbed “Stu-pid” Pearce.

Pearce was able to select three “over-age” players, consisting of Craig Bellamy, Micah Richards and media stud Ryan Giggs over the 37 year old Beckham, who also became an ambassador for the Olympic Bid (in 2005) with some of Britain’s sporting heroes including Athletics runner, Dame Kelly Holmes, and Politician Tony Blair, to name a few.

The patron, who made it clear he would love to represent the country, once again, was left in seclusion by the decision.

Many once again question the validity of the Olympic Games, its organisers and Pearce.

In 1994, Pearce verbally cast a racial slur at player Paul Ince, calling him a black c**t. Pearce later admitted this, and claimed it “was not appropriate at the time.” Pearce has also been a raging alcoholic in the past.

Former England defender Danny Mills claimed “Stuart Pearce doesn’t always like confrontation and he’s struggled with big players in the past. Maybe he’s thinking that what Beckham brings with him is too much to handle.” Pearce instead felt Ryan Giggs, fresh off his own public misdemeanours, would bypass this problem.

Beckham has an astonishing 109 caps, surpassing the late Bobby Moore’s record in the sport.

Tottenham Hotspur manager Harry Redknapp stated that “Stuart can kiss goodbye to a knighthood but credit him for being brave. He’s the manager and should pick who he wants.”

Even Newcastle native Alan Shearer chipped in. “I’m amazed as I thought he was going to be part of it after all he’s done getting the Olympics to London. “If Stuart Pearce had no intention of playing him, the very least he could have done was tell him so earlier.”

Chairman of the Olympic committee Lord Coe is expected to give Beckham a role for the event somewhere, for his sterling work in putting a stamp on the occasion.

Spurs midfielder Harry Kane also believed Beckham would have encouraged more dignified youth in football, as well sport overall – “David Beckham was down here at Spurs when he was getting fit, and it was amazing to see him in the dressing room, to talk to him because he has been through it all and is one of the greatest role models ever,” when Becks participated in a few training sessions at the hotspot down in Chigwell, Essex.

Becks also had two sites, one in L.A and the other in London comprising the David Beckham Academy, set up in 2005, encouraging others to train in football, which was forced to close in 2009.

Some people come to see Beckham for his talent; others come to see his raw hotness. Either way, with David out of the squad, most ticket sales look gloomier than usual. Many would have paid to see Beckham, without a shadow of a doubt.

If there’s one man in football, who strikes a chord with everyone, in a positive light, its David Beckham.

Spice Girls reform some Zigga Zig Ah!

All smiles on Tuesday (26th June) as The Spice Girls reformed to launch a new West End stage show on London’s Piccadilly strip.

Where it all began.

Reunited for the first time in years, and some ten years since their first single, Wannabe, which became the staple of the band, engulfing “Girl Power” to all females around the globe, all five members, Baby, Sporty, Ginger, Scary and Posh took a snap at the foot of the stairs featured in the very Wannabe single, from 1996, at Euston’s St. Pancras Hotel.

Though body language experts claim all was not as rosy as it seemed, with all girls seeming distant with one another. Posh Spice, aka, Victoria Beckham, fresh off numerous flights over the globe, looked tired, but couldn’t muster a smile in the snap. Mel B’s posture was classed as looking “outward” signifying a closed off connection to the group. The others were seemingly apart also, though Emma Bunton and Mel C kept the momentum in check. Speculation was cast as to any potential upset occurring. This is mild speculation, of course, and one should not fully listen to the newspapers that spout any gossip to create a false sense of meaning to manipulate your mind.

Posh, arriving back home in L.A.

Victoria wanted to jet back to her humble abode in Los Angeles, America, alongside David and the boys to see daughter Harper.

Emma, Geri Halliwell and Mel B partied into the night around London, whilst sporty spice Melanie Chisholm was nowhere in sight.

Emma Bunton, looking glam in Orange

The West End musical, joining the likes of Grease, Ghost and Guys and Dolls will feature a multitude of Spicey hits, written by Absolutely Fabulous comedienne Jennifer Saunders, who once dressed as Ginger Spice in a mock up for single Who Do Ya Think You Are? alongside four other celebs.

The musical will be named Viva Forever. The show’s main story will be based on “a beautiful, talented girl and her best friends who get swept up in the obsession of today’s TV celebrity culture.”

Doors open on December 11th 2012, at the Piccadilly Theatre, London.

Rumours circulated earlier in the year that all spices would participate in the Queen’s Diamond Jubillee celebrations in April. This did not occur.

Others include all five divas opening the Olympic Games ceremony, which has also been denied. Though to encourage sport, females and the games, it may not have been the worst decision to open the extravaganza.

Boris Johnson:Lord of London’s Rings

Boris Johnson, and his five Olympic rings of virtue, or whatever…

Lord of the Rings!

On Wednesday 27th June, re-elected London Mayor Boris Johnson unveiled the five Olympic rings over the side of London Bridge, with Olympics organiser Lord (Sebastian) Coe.

Lord Coe, fresh off the Olympic torch relay run, fast-tracked into London to commemorate the event with the Mayor.

That’s a big boat…

London at night

After the glorious unveiling, good ‘ol Mayor Boris explained the meaning of the five rings, also poised by Channel 4 newscaster, Cathy Newman.

“Look at those five rings. Baron Pierre de Coubertin said that they symbolised the five great Olympic virtues of athleticism, sportsmanship, exertion, poverty, chastity…or whatever. Well, roughly those ones.”

The chastity claim was the killer line that made all burst out with a right ‘ol chuckle. Thank you Mr.Mayor.

The NEW Archbishop in 10-12 years?

So, Great Britain, what do the five rings stand for? Leave us a comment explaining their meaning. Perhaps you could become the Lord of the Rings.

The pinnacle of London Town 🙂

Culture Secretary, Jeremy Hunt, quietly unmentioned on the sidelines, took a photo on his mobile phone, who has not been reprimanded for his grave misdemeanours surrounding the Leveson inquiry, phone hacking, and the Murdoch empire’s takeover bid of Media outlet BskyB.

Ever involved with his phone…

David Cameron’s discord on Housing Benefits

It’s all change again this week.

David Cameron blasts Jimmy Carr’s tax avoidance as “morally wrong”, while Mr. Cameron shortly after, chosen to sensationally cut Housing Benefit for under 25 year old residents of the UK.

Feeling these ‘kids’ had it too easy, and were claiming off the welfare system to have a better life, cutting these benefits, in Cameron’s mind was a choice that many, including modern day over 25s, who work would support the choice. The majority I have witnessed have not shared that view.

Apologetic Comedian Jimmy Carr publicly holds his hands up and takes responsibility for his blunder.

At 28 myself, never having a pot to hold, stuck on the welfare system, though I have been committed and trying all my life, even when I was under 25, and deemed another number in Cameron’s “Big Society”,  the question has to be asked, how many will suffer as a consequence of this action.

Dr Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury, with a grave warning to Cameron’s “Big Society”

Aiming to re-establish a society of working people, in our young as well as middle aged, elderly and all in between, Cameron doesn’t realise he has actually opened those floodgates which will destroy the morality of the country.

Crime rates, burglaries of people’s homes or the outside goods, gang culture, political unrest and to top it all, young people struggling with bills and the cost of living, without the aid of the benefits, will consider and indeed, some, will commit suicide. No-one wants to say that out loud, do they? We can’t mention this, but the fact is, sweeping it under the carpet doesn’t eliminate the problem does it?

For those who don’t take their lives, which I implore no one to consider doing, most people cannot live with their parents as many are disowned, come from turbulent families torn apart or in warzones, or have parents who are deceased.

Sending them “back to their parents” doesn’t solve the solution, it creates dissolution. Plus, it doesn’t create independence, does it? Which then highlights the extreme mass flaws of the subject at hand, because, instead of relying on the state, they then rely on their parents (because they have no choice), which them ill prepares them for life in general.

How is anyone able to move forward, when you people back?

Get a job, Cameron says. Here’s an idea. Create Jobs! Maybe then people will apply. The reason people don’t work, and want to, is because, ‘Jobs’ (which are not ‘Careers’) are only in Retail, or Administration sectors. Some are now in building. Most are in trades or specialist lines of work. Specialist help, funding, and apprenticeships don’t exist in mass quantities.

Placed in any PR/Marketing/Advertising/Journalist/Writer/Editorial role myself, I could contribute to the community and the commercial economy fruitfully. The stubborn attitude, dominated by Upper class, nose snorting, sneering disgust at a “commoner” taking a qualified role in a ‘traditional gentleman’s ruled job’ which has now been distorted by the media mogul bearers who have severe dysfunctional ideologies surround who, what and how the position should ‘look’ than be built on talent, economical standard and professionalism.

Westminster’s snobbery has poured into London, and widely plaguing the country at the same time with its sheer ignorance to ruining a democracy which is dictated by random suits, billing themselves as the country’s saviours.

The country should be comprised of 30+ males and females, distorted from reality, creating an alternate one, where we all have 2 or 3 lovely children, have flowers in pot plants on the side table, and all sit at the dinner table from 1950 to share a home cooked meal by Betty Crocker.

How can society move forward, if it continues to live in the past?

Congratulations Dave, you have secured yourself for the next election. Enjoy your surroundings in No.10 Downing Street. You have successfully handed the government to Labour for next however many years. What job could David Cameron do once leaving the commons to become a “Commoner?” The David Cameron show!

“You’re Worthless, You’re disgusting, Get a job!!”

Cameron, who makes a law and forces it as a demand, than a decision, without considering that this will make the  country evermore disjointed from reality, then drives them further away from connection in society. Communities or people don’t stick together, they attack one another in order to survive, all thanks to your cutting of benefit without understand the severe repercussions that tear the country apart.

David Cameron, two months ago, was all smiles in a country pub, with his wife and children. Family man, husband, father. Casting away Politician, to leave a family life in a peacefully retreat full of publicity stunted cameras, wide spread on newspapers, shortly left the vicinity happy, caring and content with his wife.

Family Man David Cameron downs a pint

This is a family man, who encourages family values. The family man, happened to lose his daughter, by leaving her behind and driving off from the pub without even realising she was missing. They eventually returned to pick up his forgotten daughter.

In an interview in the Mail on Sunday, on June 24th 2012, regarding the issue of the housing benefit collapse, one infeasible journalist sensationally claims Britain is adorned with “feckless couples” claiming housing benefits.

Candid choice of words

Preaching to live with your families, Mr. Cameron believes we should all be working for our own families in the near future.

Living back at home, with parents, and jobless, can we ever aim to not only own our own home, or flat, but be able to have a child or two, supposedly the joy of life, and manage to look after this innocent that become a burden on ourselves, which also creates bad parenting, and then, continues the ever decreasing cycle of future children growing up in poverty, abuseful homes or settings and uneducated without any morals or upbringing on what is correct, let alone having a childhood robbed from them.

Next he’ll be evicting everyone from the Big Brother house.

Yesterday, Wednesday 27th June, in London, one “heckler” raised the issue in a publich speech by the PM, addressing the Olympic Games at a public event, where the PM responded “Don’t spoil it!” rather loud and passive aggressively.

David Cameron pledged to cut all things except for parental benefits, including Child Benefit. Did you really not see that one coming? We will address the state of education and welfare in greater detail in a forthcoming post.

Though cutting these housing benefits, apart from all the distress mentioned about, here’s the killer problem. Many more people will become clinically depressed. Those that don’t kill themselves, or be killed, are then able to claim Employment and Support Allowance (more on this later) and become absent from working and potentially a threat to society for their foreseeable future.

What levels of community, support and guidance are there, if all is cut away from us, in one fell swoop?

If Mr. Cameron is willing to have an interview with me at No.10 I will graciously accept, as I have a lot of issues to discuss that can benefit the country, help you understand the pitfalls, and the perils of the state and address further instances that can only be discussed in private.

Will Ed Milliband succeed as Prime Minister?

I am asking. I have been seeking a conversation for over five years. If any other politician is willing to listen, conversate or take on matters of importance, please get in touch, or leave us a comment and we can supply an email address for you. Or contact on Cameron’s hated form of communication, social media, or Twitter for example.

 

Thank You.

Big Brother’s Bother, Benedict’s Bashing and Five’s fracas

Image

Last Friday, 22nd June 2012, Benedict Garrett, former teacher and porn star became the third contestant to be voted out of the Big Brother house.

Image

In a furore of the fracas from Channel 5/Big Brother’s inept production of the series so far, this result sparked immense fury among its fanbase.

Garrett, 32, from Manchester faced the vote, a popular choice, alongside another popular choice, student, Lauren Carre, 20.

Image

The reason for Garrett being voted out of the Big Brother compound, was due solely to the fact that he had masturbated in the shower and toilet, a private space away from the remaining housemates, to which they objected and in hindsight, voted a guy out for having a wank, which most men do as a natural occurrence.

In a responsible fashion, the culprit, Benedict, who also cleared up after himself once doing said deed, choose to have a mature discussion with the younger, childish members of the house.

Ringleader Caroline, 20, with her witches coven of Ashleigh, Sara, and Scott, with others lingering nearby, chose to strategically rally her  numbers to vote and cost Benedict because they were childish to the fact a man, with levels of testosterone, chose to commit a sex act in private, in a purely natural manner.

Image

Image

Caroline, seemingly friends with Lauren, instigated Carre’s downfall to face the vote, of which she has survived, for now.

Image

All the girls had been hanging around, sharing time and with Lauren, until stabbing her in the back without her realising.

The Lady Macbeth of the house, with extreme birdnest hair, and an incandescent, lewd tongue, full of hatred, expressed with disgusted and pompous vehelemency, dictated the nominations, as Big Brother, on Channel 5, allowed housemates to openly discuss nominations. Some of her remarks of other housemates include “ghastly” “horrible” while claiming she felt “uncomfortable” and “victimised” by certain behavior.

Image

Casting away the original concept that the series was built upon,and what made the show a roaring success, previously on Channel 4, instantly peaked as a shambolic setting for the nationwide institution that was Big Brother.

Big Brother, chose to finally disallow the continual daily talk of nominations shortly on Tuesday. Housemates nominated on Monday. Prior to this, in a task in which Arron Lowe, 23, caught a timebomb, quickly passed the contraption to Benedict, where the punishment inside contained a right to revoke Benedict’s options to cast nominations that week.

Causing the mass engulfment on micro blogging site, Twitter, fans complained in their thousands, which made Big Brother’s production finally consider they had dropped the ball immensely.

Technically, Big Brother should have changed the vote. They could have…

a) cancelled the eviction, refunded all previous votes, (as no one wanted either housemate to leave considering the rule change), and re-scheduled for Sunday instead, then,

b) Either nominated all remaining housemates, or,

c) the most legitimate choice, to place all housemates selected for eviction by the two who were nominated (Lauren and Benedict) to be up for the vote. Benedict didn’t nominate, therefore Lauren’s two choices should have been selected.

Image

Big Brother neglected to change their ways, and as a result lost an extremely popular public figure and character in the house, creating interesting TV viewing also.

In aiming to Americanise itself, creating open nomination conversations to give more of a ‘game play’ choice, BB has now stripped all of its show to shreds. Many feel this is one reason adding to the cheapening of the show. No –one fully respects the show, its choices, nor its interest. Most turned off or didn’t bother watching after Benedict left the house.

If BB changed the vote, not for favouritism but for legitimate rule changing, it would have maintained whatever credibility it may have been able to retain.

Image

Many knew it would fail on the Channel 5 platform, while others had hoped it would still remain a mild success despite its watered down treatment.

Channel 5 have a habit of pinching worthy named formats, and categorically, putting their stamp on it, yet watering it down also, then causing the show/s to become lacklustre.

They can’t be blamed entirely, however, as Big Brother’s new production takeover, with stubborn attitude and delay to act, may have cost them more than they truly realise.  Though some still watch, most feel neglected, robbed or bored of the series, with all interesting characters leaving the show in the first 3-6 weeks, which adds an air of idiocy to the fact their sole aim was to create interesting characters from the new branding of the show, more so this year.

Big Brother is in its second year on Channel 5 currently, with the last series, becoming dull and destructive.

Last year’s winner Aaron Allard Morgan,31, from Weston Super-Mare,  pocketing £50,990, claimed at least 4-5 contestants attempted suicide or had those tendencies because of the show. Barely any at all claimed this was a case with the Channel 4 production, which ran for 11 successful years.

Image

Image

Image

Brian Dowling, winner of Series 2, popular celebrity and respected individual, an adequate choice, became the host with the new series on Channel 5, after the exceptional Davina McCall relinquished the duties once the show moved channels.

Image

Dowling has come under scrutiny from some watching, as too scripted, jokey and lacking all round personality from the caricature possibly enforced by show bosses.

Upon eviction Garrett, who also looted a chair, left for one reason, he masturbated. Living in a society which chooses sympathy votes to unstable housemates, who go back to the same people who cause the insults and abuse, casts a gloomy shadow over the tangibility to the structure of the show.

The fact a grown man was evicted for doing a natural act, in a private place, encouraging sympathy votes to non-interest competition whilst allowing disparaging behaviour, and only condoning lame punishments such as “no hot water” or removal of curling irons, exposes the inadequacies of the show. The show should just be left to die peacefully. No good can ever come from Big Brother any more. Exhuming the format has now allowed the show to continue rotting to its very core, until it finally disintegrates after its odorous stench of festering decay fossilises the entire design.

This week, Benedict had received numerous hate messages on Twitter, and even had his account suspended yesterday, in an unexplained reason.

Image

One source on Twitter claimed directly to me that someone working at Big Brother HQ had cut or closed the phone lines for Lauren. Either this was a lie to enforce votes, or a feasible reason. On Friday, Benedict was evicted. Either Big Brother did play dirty and then hoping not to get caught out manipulated the choice on the quiet. If not, then a lie was facilitated to enhance votes in a biased fashion. The source profusely claimed they were not lying. Looks like Big Brother has serious explaining to do.