Royal Baby name if a girl? Diana? No. Here’s why…

Why Royal Baby No. 2 should

NOT be named Diana

ff ROYAL BABY GIRL copy

Future King of England Prince William and his pregnant wife Kate are expecting their second child any moment now. After giving birth to any heir some two years ago with Prince George, the young Royal couple are well respected by the British public and FalseFabs. Though the public have issued their attempts to share some joy with interference on naming the incoming child.

Should the gender be of a female nature, the public would like the young couple to name her Diana, after William and Prince Harry’s late mother Princess Diana of Wales.  Diana was also known as the People’s Princess, for her stellar work and natural warmth to society, on a global scale earning her respect the world over, none more-so than Britain itself. Her untimely departure from the world years ago will always be remembered but her spirit remains stronger in the nations hearts.

royal baby 1

Diana was the greatest pioneer to come out of England, let alone the Royal Family and transcend the bond between reality and rich. Never forgetting her roots and giving back to the people and society in grand scales, which can not truly be measured, was testament to her livelihood. She gave people hope, love and possibilities.

While the name might be fitting and nationalist’s would hope for her to memory to live on, naming the child Diana would be a grave mistake. Diana is one of a kind and can never be replaced. Once named, the child bears the greatest and unfair responsibility of such shadow which can never be outshone. A feel good moment cannot replace a lifetime and this will impede on the child furthermore. While it might be ‘good’ for the public to get a smile and achieve their ‘desire’ of naming a Royal baby, firstly, the child is not the public’s. It’s William and Kate’s. Secondly, the child cannot be given such a pedestal to never climb above for their entire lifespan. Thirdly, it would make a mockery and laughing stock of all involved, parents, Diana and the Royal’s as-well-as the state of the public.

Eloquent Radiance... Princess Diana, the UK's greatest Royal.

Eloquent Radiance… Princess Diana, the UK’s greatest Royal.

The child should be named as the parents wish and not be influenced by some random people who would like a lovely moment. The child should be enough, surely?

Modern Royal’s William and Harry were thrust into the limelight at a young age and a media swirl of fundamental problems to this very day. Both William and Harry are the greatest young Royal’s we have, with Diana to thank. We should make sure that the modern future is not tainted by public meandering or political sway which has the power to cripple them. For the future of the country, the trio with babies on the way can establish a more harmonious relationship to the Royal Family if it abides by a strong will and compassion for society were appropriate.

Bonny Lad... Prince George is dashing young dungarees

Bonny Lad… Prince George in dashing young outfit

Diana’s name and timeless work will always remain high in the world. There is no need to christen the child with such hypocrisy, even if the Royal’s feel pressure to add a ‘traditional’ name on their child within the Royal Family bloodline.

Name your child, not anyone else’s.

Anyway, it seems too obvious for the want of a female, that they will probably have another male.

FalseFabs wishes them nothing but happiness throughout.

IMAGES

redicecreations

hercampus

Advertisements

Grant Shapps Wikipedia Scandal!

Tory Chairman Grant Shapps accused of biased editing of rivals public Wikipedia records

ff SHAPPS WIKI copy

Conservative Party Chairman Grant Shapps, who also uses an alias as Michael Green to work in a second job, has been strongly accused of tampering with Wikipedia accounts of political rivals.

Fearing a loss at the General Election for his party, which have a track record over the last 5 years of scandal, deceit, corruption and cheating, Shapps/Green decided to change the accounts to display negative details of rivals.

An account was specifically linked back to Shapps, who has been using media over the same periods to bash oppositions with unbacked-up statements of smears, by Wikipedia and others.

Shapps who has been caught out, has publicly denied the reports, as usual. In another blow for the Tory party, publics continue to see it as liars, cheats and corruption at its finest for failing to be honest and hold hands up. But then, Shapps knows what he is doing is “morally wrong” and cannot defend the actions. Shapps adds someone may have acted on his behalf, including co-chairman of the Tories, on Shapps’ behalf. Therefore an admission that one of them has done so. As well as the fact that it was still under Shapps direction to do so. You really can’t make it up. The hole dug is getting very deep it would seem.

David Cameron. Always at the centre of public controversy and deceit.

David Cameron. Always at the centre of public controversy and deceit.

Leader of the Party and country, David Cameron, who loves to jump into a public statement on anything as it happens, has once again yet to comment on Shapps’ shady smearing. It is yet another scandal which seems to happen daily or weekly with almost every party member of the Tories today.

Mr Shapps, who has been involved in multiple scandals, the earliest over a rough six months, threatened legal action to someone who exposed his lies of working at a second job, whilst as party chair of the Conservatives. What a wimp.

The claims were dismisses, as journalists who did their job telling the truth, could not possibly face any bullying tactic to stand up in court, even if Shapps and his party lobby justice officials.

Earlier in 2012, the Daily Mail, among others, broke the story of a secret in-house affair of a senior Conservative official with another female party member. Both are married and highly praise adultery as sinful actions to Conservative values. There have been multiple scandals of cheating by scores of Tories, broken in the press, which none threatened with lacking legitimacy of legal action.

mail front page

The party covered up the release of the people having the affair but everyone in journalistic circles is aware the adulterer is Mr Grant Shapps. Mr Cameron knew of the affair and while “stunned” agreed to cover it up.

We can reveal this as it is not ‘officially named in the press’ meaning that it is ‘allegedly’ an ‘opinion’ (one of truth) and cannot be legally contested no matter how much spin is placed. Of course, as well, since we know, but cannot publicly confirm or deny, this is clearly labelled as comment or opinion.

That’s the Tories for you though. Hide behind the state totalitarian system they created for themselves to penalise the truth and hard-working, moral, decent citizens of the United Kingdom.

Tory Chair, Grant Shapps/Michael Green

Tory Chair, Grant Shapps/Michael Green

Cheating is in the blood, it would seem. Mr Shapps has Conned his way to the Wikipedia pages and the Tory Party. Instead of being a weasel hiding behind lies, perhaps he could gain some respect, what’s left of it, by being honest and stop lying about his deceit. Throwing around the justice system as a tactic to quieten truth is a reprehensible act that undermines the legal profession and the public’s lacking access to the courts aswell.

Over the past five years, leader David Cameron imposed Legal Aid restrictions, meaning the middle class sector of families and citizens would not have access to legal representation. Either they must represent themselves in court, or pay costs for barristers.

Experts and insiders claim this is a strict violation of legal reform that prevents access to the justice system for people of the nation, an imperative that was created solely for all to have access to.

Those who are poor and may qualify for Legal Aid are usually given cheap or rubbish lawyers and already stigmatised as not able to put a good case together. They are also quietly judged on appearance and background as lowest of society, where judges already set them up for a loss of the case as a result.

One question also remains on the side of Wikipedia. How does it manage to report accurate information on its database, without allowing tampering of pages with lies? It could and probably should hire real editors, given the information to update by Wikipedia frontman Jimmy Wales. Or it could offer a rate of payment per article, or in bundle to update and alter pages correctly.

jimmy wales

Currently Wikipedia, with low investment, allows anyone with an account to change/update pages. This has for years undermined the service as non-journalistic as a source of information. One question is certain. It cannot go on like that forever as a service, if it wants to be respected fully on it’s information gathering.

Political bodies, politicians or monetary services and donors in liaison with governments should not have access to such a platform for abuse.

IMAGES

The Spectator

Daily Mail

PeterReynolds/Wordpress

Skeptic Wars / Blogspot

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice Trailer released

Long awaited hero mash-up teases mini clip

Over this Weekend Superhero lovers were treated to no one but two epic coming movie trailers. Yesterday on this site we showed the Star Wars Episode VII clip. (Previous post)

Now it’s the turn of the long awaited and somewhat sceptical coming film Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice. Well, here we go… 🙂 Sound off in the comments below! (Please try to keep them clean.)

The Film is set for release in 2016, starring Ben Affleck and Henry Cavill. Gal Gadot also joins as the revamped Wonder Woman.

Source: Warner Bros. Pictures/Youtube

Star Wars Ep. VII Trailer Released Here! Come Watch!

The Seventh long awaited instalment to the epic Star Wars frontier returns with a teasing snippet of a trailer. (below)

The flick, titled Star Wars Episode VII: The Force Awakens will feature some new and old favourites, put together by Lost and Star Trek buff JJ Abrams.

The film is set for release on 18th December so jot it in your diaries wielders of Lightsabre’s!

On offer are Darth Vader’s crushed helmet, a black Strom Trooper, epic galactic battle scenes and the return of Episode Sixes star trio Han Solo, (Chewie), Princess Leia and Luke Skywalker.

“We’re Home!”

Source: Movie Clips Trailers/YouTube

BBC GE 2015 Debate: Austerity Must Go!

Second Leaders debate with BBC: five leaders, one chicken

and an absent whining baby

ff bbc debate copy

During the Election debates on the BBC in the second of special debate programmes leading into the General Election 2015 for the UK, five of the seven main party leaders participated.

They were Ed Miliband (Labour), Nicola Sturgeon (SNP), Leanne Wood (Plaid Cymru), Natalie Bennett (Green) and Nigel Farage (UKIP).

Live-Election-Debate

Sitting leader of the country David Cameron (Conservative) previously issued an ultimatum to broadcasters and snubbed their offer, dictating to them he must not participate. They also added that the leader Nick Clegg (Liberal Democrats) not appear. Deputy Prime Minister Clegg did not turn up, despite having his own mind, supposedly. He claims the Conservatives, also known as Tory’s, secretly blocked him from appearing afraid he would reveal all the dodgy secrets of the Tory party over the last 5 years involving immense systemic abuse. Cameron also demanded he not be upstaged with ’empty chairs or podiums’ on the set. They were not used by the BBC and only 5 podiums were on display with the appearing leaders.

The debate focused on many issues and covered a lot of ground in an hour and a half with all leaders looking impressive in their own right, even if disagreeable. Cameron and Clegg looked like fools, sitting at home using responses to try and win in pre-fabricated statements made in advance alongside the biased press backdoor deals. They also sent statements online, which proved they were still involving themselves in the debate, which is shambolic to avoid.

Took bold choice to debate among absent dictators.

Took bold choice to debate among absent dictators.

Nicola Sturgeon and Ed Miliband agreed on multiple issues, but were divided over a coalition pact for now. This may change as the country expects a likely coalition government due to the changing nature of politics since Cameron sold out with Clegg in 2010 after failing to get elected. Labour leader Ed Miliband wanted to take his chances at gaining a majority in the election. Should this fail, SNP’s Sturgeon is offering a deal for the benefit of the country to rid the country of the evil totalitarian Tory governmental corruptions and abuses with austerity.

Also in the debate, a shockingly surprise move came from Nigel Farage, who seemed open to Labour at one point, launched an unprovoked attack which has cost the UKIP leader dearly. Without Cameron or Clegg, Farage attempted to be Alpha Male of politics and sideline Miliband. Farage failed to understand the only way to be electable from a political perspective is to join with them to get their ‘foot in the door’ and build politicians by 2020. Rebuffing this idea, Farage could eventually peter-out and lose his stead by 2020. It made UKIP lose its position of common sense to utter delusion and nonsense political play.

Green Party leader Natalie Bennett also opposed austerity as did Leanne Wood. Both put in good statements but failed to follow through effectively on plans fuller to make enough impact by trying to simply ruffle feathers which contradicted their own policies somewhat in part.

Green Leader Natalie Bennett put in another credible performance, but needs the extra mile push.

Green Leader Natalie Bennett put in another credible performance, but needs the extra mile push.

Though Sturgeon clashed with Farage over immigration as UKIP’s one key central policy, to abandon the EU to solve immigration, was Farage’s only bargaining chip for votes, sinking like a lead balloon. Farage failed to be comprehensive and at one point verbally attacked the audience of specially chosen voters by an independent panel/company unaffiliated with politics or the broadcasters. Chair of the debate David Dimblebee also pointed this out. He called the BBC left wing standards, after which the audience, under fire, did not appreciate.

For years the BBC had been led by ex-Conservative politicians who abused their position of political neutrality by offering biased news reports daily to favour Conservatives. It also hid multiple scandals over the years, including the infamous Paedophile scandal involving Sir Jimmy Savile, closely affiliated with Conservative governments and given access to abuse and rape children in hospitals and on sets at the BBC. The BBC workers admitted it was told to “turn a blind eye” when seeing Savile accost his victims on set and in his dressing room.

The BBC is funded by the taxpayer, the public, to produce content in their name, which is under scrutiny for failing to be of political neutrality.

David Cameron, ever the opportunist for a public statement, carefully edited and presented, said of the debates it was “part of the deal that was done to unblock the log-jam about TV debates” and was “delighted that I played a role unblocking that log-jam”. He said all participants in it were arguing to “abandon the plan that has turned this country around and has got us more jobs, more livelihoods and more business”. Mr.Cameron only joined in ONE debate with, as all seven leaders, hoping they would take the heat off of his tough questioning on ruining the country in the last five years. He has been urged to join in all debates to which Cameron has snubbed so he doesn’t look bad as he feels he cannot publicly defend his non-achieving five year term in office. He continues to control state media and news broadcasters in his favour.

Cameron has failed to meet one pledge of his many made in 2010-2015 and everyone has been a personal one to him, offering no democratic value to the people who may have voted for him in 2010.

Ed Miliband once again offered Cameron the chance to join in and debate him one on one, which the supposed leader of the country said was over and done with.

Farage looked like he was picking fights, but did try to be the one who ‘spoke about the stuff people won’t speak of.’ (Which is actually what FalseFabs is doing.) Farage also chose to follow up on his first debates’ controversial comments about health tourism involving HIV treatment. He said immigrants came to get diagnosed and receive up to £25,000 worth of drugs to help. The public did not buy his demonstrations, as they put it.

Controversial. Farage in trouble loose HIV explanation again.

Controversial. Farage in trouble loose HIV explanation again.

One important stat to also explain is that in London alone, an average of roughly 20,000 men were quietly diagnosed with HIV, both gay and straight in 2010-2015 under the coalition government (Conservative and Liberal Democrats). This demonstrates how many people society and David Cameron have truly failed in ‘brushing it under the carpet’ to look good. They do not plan to do anything further.

Bennett made strong cases but didn’t back up enough impact this time around. She offered jobs, climate change and public services to be saved. She challenged the public to “change the establishment.”

Sturgeon outlined the end of Austerity and to get the country moving again with a communal aspect of society, which was welcomed by many.

Miliband also came out on top with Sturgeon over protecting the country from threats, helping working families and look after the young members of society growing up in middle age from 30 onwards. Miliband has also been a key champion in protecting the vital NHS health service, which the Tories plan to privatise.

Strong, bold and feisty. Sturgeon on fine form outlining austerity end for honest British people.

Strong, bold and feisty. Sturgeon on fine form outlining austerity end for honest British people.

Wood may have been an extra on stage, but pressed hard on issues to show no pushover, well. The problem was she chose the wrong targets and couldn’t feasibly back up those claims.

After the debate the Tory party were given full stage support and not pressing on any statements over the TV debate even though their leader failed to join.

Any one party or leader who does not appear on a political TV debate scheduled for the General Election which requires the public votes from the electorate is shambolic and no politician has the right to tamper with bribing officials. The fact Cameron has done so means he should be struck off from being elected AND the party represented (Conservative) should be relegated from this year’s election as candidates.

May need to be called in to deal with totalitarian rule tampering with democratic process.

May need to be called in to deal with totalitarian rule tampering with democratic process.

It is unacceptable totalitarian Nazism rule which NO leader has the right to alter in a democratic process as the electorate need to hear the voices that are eligible for voting. No one has issued the policy and The Queen, who can develop a Royal Charter can, but has failed to do so, for her country. She is said to be a heavy Tory supporter and affects her political neutrality. She is also David Cameron’s cousin and meets him weekly for discussions, which affects her and Cameron’s position in office. She should make it law now. If she fails, then it should be imposed by Lord Neuberger and the Supreme Court imminently.

Child has had enough of Cameron as he tries another PR attempt before last fortnights debates.

Child has had enough of Cameron as he tries another PR attempt before last fortnights debates.

No-one politician should be allowed to abuse the system for political gain and like all ruling elites must be held to account. Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II need to do one last important act for her country, this would be it. Now is her time. Many regard her as a useless Monarch who only sits on a gold chair and does nothing but pocket salary from Tory handouts, which gave her extra income over the last five years also.

Should do something for her country.

Should do something for her country.

We are not Hitler’s children and the Cameron Youth Movement must not be allowed to interfere with the political spectrum under any circumstance in a democratic process. If politicians fail to act, then other institutions must intervene as soon as possible. Everyone else in the country is held to account except politicians and there is no excuse for tinkering with political injustice.

Cameron also famously hired ex-editor and biased spin doctor Andy Coulson, the first convicted criminal in the halls of Westminster Parliament as Head of Communications. He served a six month jail sentence, which included hacking a dead child’s phone for a news story, leading parents to believe the child was alive to access the messages.

IMAGES

BBC

The Mirror

The Guardian

The Independent

Daily Mail

Daily Record

The Irrefutable Best Books of 2014, As Determined by Science*

As posted from original poster. A great collection of literature to check out.

Sorry Television

IMG_0092It’s been a trying year here at Sorry Television. Sidetracked by work—and, let’s be honest, an endless procession of binge-worthy Netflix inventory—I am set to close out 2014 with a mere 32 books under my belt, near enough to bi-weekly that I should probably rebrand as You’re Welcome Television (subtitle: Reading Books Every So Often, Like When the Power Goes Out). I’m already planning redemptive 2015 reading goals (a book a day? a book an hour?) but for the time being I’ll have to accept mediocrity, and foist as much blame as possible on a shorter commute’s ability to stymie even the most dedicated bibliophile.

But I can claim a smidge of productivity this month, which is why I’m Indiana-Jonesing under the content door that is Christmas week to bring you The Irrefutable Best Books of 2014, a master list of this year’s greatest hits, as determined by 21 other “best of”s written by people who have actually read them…

View original post 573 more words