Chris Grayling wants to make UK Totalitarian law bending Utopia over internet trolls

Grayling: Totalitarian Phantom laws for ‘trolls’ in Utopianist Britain raises systemic Governmental abuse

FF grayling trolls copy

Corrupt Justice Minister Chris Grayling has struck again at another attempt to abuse the laws of the United Kingdom to con their way into an election victory in May 2015.

Using the opportunity to try and gain votes from mothers and women over fears of online ‘trolls’ Grayling has instantly attempted to create any opportunity to trivialise law making by corrupt lobbyists of Westminster’s dark depraved halls. This is clearly an attempt to trap people into a jail sentence for those who are not these types of trolls and scaremonger and smear law abiding citizens with a strong opinion to trap them into a criminal punishment and stain their name. The ‘trolls’ they are attempting to ‘clean up’ Britain with are not trolls but over heightened abusive people online that lazy, out of touch politicians have scrambled upon a branding thereof. All due to different political beliefs, not with their ‘only us’ ways.

Yes, they need to be dealt with, but rushing and charging in all guns blazing with an empty law and no basis or thought will provide the corrupt UK Conservatives with another crippling blow in the future of the party. Already secretly changing laws in quiet and blaming the internet again and again in an attempt by idealistic Tories to ‘clean up’ Britain will once again damage and isolate the country and likely encourage more abuse than deter it.

Out of touch politicians never learn and think they can abuse the power from their personal choosing making the UK a new age totalitarian state.

Heavy Tory donor Lord Ashcroft, who shamefully funded David Cameron’s 2010 election campaign in secret, even told the Tories months ago to stop being complacent with their own selfish attitudes. Once again the Tories failed to listen to its most biggest and crucial donor let alone reform their attitude. Party politicians and donors have also defected to UKIP (United Kingdom Independence Party) instead, ruffling the Tory roost.

Politicians forget the public place them into office to represent the people of the country under a democratic process, not create an elitist club of out of touch, millionaire politicians trying to create an utopianist Britain based on shameful old age principals that fail to work in a modern age.

Not even one week old and Grayling jumped on a chance opportunity to attack online audiences and general members of the public over the Judy Finnigan rape row.

judy finnigan

Outspoken. Finnigan defended convicted rapist Ched Evans on talkshow.

Finnigan, a former daytime television host made blind sighted remarks about convicted rapist Ched Evans, who was debated as being allowed to play football again after his release from prison, appraisal. Her daughter Chloe defended her comments.  Both were soon given the ‘specialist troll’ treatment with high levels of abuse which we say is fully unacceptable for having an opinion. However, Grayling decided to use this as an excuse to make up a law which is entirely loose and ludicrous systemic abuse of the courts. He plans to amend the Crime Bill that currently exists, but fails to understand it does not exist, even if chaperoning legit law from the past. That clause is not legitimate and therefore irrelevant. Any defence can easily disregard it in the courts. Any judge agreeing based on personal attachment to it needs investigating into corruption of the court.

Finnigan and her daughter were told they would be raped by ‘trolls’ and Grayling decided to use her daughter Chloe to begin drafting a ‘Chloe’s Law’ to prevent trolls online. Chloe’s Law, which is entirely ridiculous, was a thought up, two minute lunacy with no depth or sustainable weight to law enforcement. Grayling went as far as to make outrageous comments that “cyber-mobs” are “poisoning” the UK and can face up to two years in prison instead of the already six month in place law. Clearly a level of personal hate in Grayling’s venomous tongue he adds they are “online terrorism” which is simply sickening for any minister to say. Trivialising such laws are a disgrace yet Grayling and pals fail to accept any attempt to stand back and think of situations or criticisms. It will not create a United Britain and continue to drive them further into going after people instead. Leading by example is fundamental with a level of rationality which is oblivious to the Tory enforcers.

Celebrity Chloe Madeley

Celebrity Chloe Madeley.

Finnigan’s daughter Chloe Madeley agreed the law needed updating to include Twitter and we agree. Thought it has to be in a controlled and rational drafting, not a personal hate which could also show that Grayling is ‘trolling the trolls’ with personal hate. Double standards do not lessen eh problem, only exemplify it.  Madeley added “I will always ignore the disgusting troll tweets I get because I honestly do not want to give them any attention. But the tweet in question took it to another level. There is a line where rationality ends and criminality begins. The person who threatened me crossed the line.”

When a ‘People’s Law’ is created it is often those who have died, been sexually abused to death, suicide or bullying in schools. Some include Aiden’s Law, Sara’s Law and others which are legitimate but often forgotten about by warbling ministers desperate to make up phantom justice on a whim.

Not only would Chloe’s Law be invisible and illegitimate, it holds no prosecutable standards which the ministers know but use their power to assume it will be made into a law. The internet is ungovernable, even if a law is enshirned by an establishment because you reside in a set country. That does not make it legitimate and therefore a defence is legal to challenge and disregard as such. Even enshrined into a law does not make it legitimate and further makes a laughing stock of the entire British Empire for such low thought and personal policy bias.

grayling

Grayling and his friends including fraudulent MP, who escaped prosecution Maria Miller, who stole from the state, continue to devise random laws to attack anyone they dislike based on strong views brought on by political wrong doing. They need to back up and think about their abuses. What they are doing is itself illegal and trying to justify it as ‘in power’ proves their systemic abuse. Trying to rush it to ‘get it in quick’ does not help anyone, as well as the fact that there are existing laws that already deal with most of their fantasy drafts.

miller con

Fraud forgotten. Close powered friends avoid prosecution.

miller sun

Excerpt from The Sun.

But they won’t listen. Therefore it is up to the courts to refuse them outright. Corrupt politicians believing they can do what they want and break the rules themselves is entirely disgraceful. In a democratic process and what used to be the greatest United Kingdom on fairness, principals and a liberal democracy, the politicians of the Tory party believe they can break it. Abuse of power when tampering with laws is outrageous and the public are not stupid as you would like them to believe. Should they fail to think long term about processes and stop attacking everything by a governing law, the courts should refuse all government interference.

The majority of laws have been systemically created by politicians who have bent the rules based on their personal opinions with a lobbying QC’s (Queen’s Council) and ministers. This is clear corruption. The government encourage it. David Cameron and his cronies who change the laws must remember, the electorate voted you in and these corrupt choices will continue to vote you out. You are not there by means of creating your own Totalitarian England. You are there to represent the needs of the UK and its residents that want their voices and rules heard, not any attempt to clamp down on people due to rich toffs in the Tory Party’s own distaste. Their attitude to multiple issues from their own assumptions is fundamentally destroying the UK with its citizens. Continuation on this will eventually create a civil war and rioting clashes if they are not careful and the government continue to disrupt the country to blame lower class citizens. In many cases it is to protect the business trading of mega rich companies who are friends of the politicians. Again, these corruptions are to support the needs of the few and not the many. All of which are good pals with the Tories, who need a job when they are voted out of politics for being bad.

The Tory party has been hit with numbers of scandals since 2010 including fraudulent expenses robberies from the taxpayer, in-party marriage affairs and infidelity on wives, the corrupt changing of laws to penalise poor people and online communities and taking away measly portions of helpful benefits to welfare claimants in desperate poverty.

trolls

To beat a troll you have to be a caveman?

If politicians were as noble as they should be from old age centuries required, they would start dealing with real laws on real criminals and abuses, than create fantasy ones on a ‘clean up’ Britain online. They never think or liaise with proper advisors of how a law is meant to be righteous and honest. Built on lies, people are bound to lie and cheat themselves aren’t they? Whose fault is that? The very ‘role models’ themselves dipping their grubbing fingers in the till getting away with it.

What ministers fail to understand are key concepts. Why the government, who shut people out of society, helps advance abuse from government abuses they get away with. Then there is the fact that clamping laws on people do not stop the abuse. The definition of troll is misunderstood by praying media and out of touch politicians. They should be liaising with people who have valid experience of over ten plus years of online communities (hint hint) as well as creating legitimate laws not tawdry ones that mean absolutely nothing. Abuse will continue to be widespread in offline as well as online communities and it has never been more important to teach kids and grown-ups too how to behave. Why have we lost the need for manners and self-control? Because the government has run around amok abusing the country for their own corrupt purposes which does not represent those who elected you into office. Such complacency is an outrageous disgrace that needs to be addressed and to treat this, politicians should lead the way. Instead they will be out for what they can get. Unless that changes, abuse will continue, because the government create such hardship and abuse. No-one chooses to wake up one day and willingly set out to abuse someone. There is always a reason or an instance, and the government do not want to figure out why it happens, they just want to wrongfully ‘lock you up and throw away the key’ for having an opinion. Some opinions ‘should’ be refined, but others are displaying how distressed people are with society. You can’t have it both ways. Everything is a compromise, but the Tories think they are the ruling Totalitarian elite and own everything they touch. That is the problem here. Even Midas came unstuck. They haven’t even been able to identify what a troll is. A troll is someone who winds you up for fun. The ‘super trolls’ who are calculated abusers and mimicking or hacking accounts are an undefined term which is what we are attempting to address here. If you are grown up and mature, then others will be. It really is that simple. There is no place in society with unfairness and that is a big problem in why cases like these occur. Wake up.

The laws that were changed to refuse legal aid to those who cannot afford representation against a baying state to penalise people based on taste is another fuller disgrace of corruption to a democratic country.

Years ago the Tories wanted to make the phrase and hashtag #ToryScum illegal because of people sharing opinions, non-malicious, about the politicians voted into PUBLIC office, failing the electorate in their hours of need, which means they are legitimately under scrutiny from those who elect them in the first place and they are public figures up for ridicule just as celebrities.

It is often staunch irony considering Tories break the laws and avoid sentencing furthering a lack of faith in the system of the British Empire let alone society. What has it come to when a farce from the Tories is that of trying to jail people for using ‘nasty words’ because of highly strung politicians who need to develop a thicker skin than running to the courts to create laws which are entirely set on abuse themselves?

One instance does not justify all, but the Tories use this as excuse to create such dissent. They are further creating hate and despicable standards as a result of law abuse. When things are unfair, no-one will recognise that as legitimate and therefore others are prone to breaking those rules from antagonisation of the shady and conniving hate fueled politicians. Personal penalisation has been rife and also landed the Tory plans for reform with welfare, forced labour and immigration benefit caps to become illegal. The Tories think they can surpass the law. No-one, including a politician, is above the law.

cam jolie

Cameron ‘dropped everything’ to chat and party with celeb in town Jolie over rape work.

Others see this as Grayling also protecting the needs of a rapist.

We are now content with locking up people with opinions that are worse terms than paedophiles, murders, rapists, fraudsters, burglaries and the like, which also goes against the law of freedom of expression, which Grayling plans to disrupt as a defence with his leaving of ECHR. That means you have no voice, say or defence against the Tories picking someone at random and choosing to jail them to serve as a Totalitarian message with its very own Gestapo at work. All because people who voted them in finally disagree with the politicians failing to represent the needs and add fairness to the country with its most vulnerable. The Tories own almost all media with its propaganda levels of Tory support in the press, especially. Freedom of expression is also a law and key fundamental principality of democratic process.

Grayling has also allowed colleges to ‘use excessive force’ to ‘disruptive’ inmates. In English, you can ruff them up and be okay from prosecution. Another level of systemic abuse. Inside suicides have increased in jail, quietly hushed up by Grayling and security services. Months prior a young man was ordered to be humiliated by an unnecessary strip search by police and meekly threw his underwear near the jumped up officer, waiting for any excuse to use a taser on the accused. He used it unnecessarily at the drop of a hat and had the gun pointed at the suspect the entire time when fully clothed.

Numbers average at more than six suicides a month. Britian’s crime rates, which the Tories lied publically as decreasing, face tough pressures with prison overcrowding.

Cameron, who made policies over rape very personal, sits with rape accused Tory speaker Nigel Evans.

Cameron, who made policies over rape very personal, sits with rape accused Tory speaker Nigel Evans, who reclaimed his job to current day.

Some tweets over Grayling’s attempt at vetting comments online, where ‘comment is free’ added –

  • #Grayling appears to have ambitions to jail everyone in Britain. He should start with himself.
  • Internet trolls face 2 years in jail under new laws. They might get a longer sentence without a lawyer #grayling
  • Prison overpopulation isn’t causing enough hardship, so #Grayling proposes we bung a few internet trolls in to make life really unpleasant
  • The scariest bit of the #Grayling proposal is the fact a politician doesn’t realise social media has a block or delete profile option.

 Source: Twitter.com

Yet there was no mention of the press being allowed to troll though. Why? The great Tory propaganda machine, perhaps? It never disagrees with the Conservatives, that’s for sure. Only The Guardian and the Daily Mirror are devoid of Tory influence. Tories never had many people disagree with them years ago because the thought they could shout them down with hardship and keep them poor. Now the electorate has risen up to be taken seriously and instead they try to supplant it down with abuse of laws. All because they don’t like the fact that people are telling them the truth of their failings and they obliviously think they are the be all and end all. A United Kingdom for them, not for others. Never the party of the people, all in it for themselves. Great Britain has always been ruled by a class system which never allows the UK ability to grow. If you are born poor, you will remain poor. The ‘aspiration nation’ is arife with false impositions. This is why the country will never grow and abuse from within will always continue, at the very precipice of the judicial system itself.

This is a law to combat cruelty – and marks our determination to take a stand against a baying cyber-mob. We must send out a clear message”.

– Chris Grayling. Justice Minister, UK.

IMAGES

Third Sector

Now Magazine

thetechjournal

James Kim

The Mirror

Advertisements

TV Review: The Paedophile Hunter

Web vigilantes: The threat to civil society.

Stinson Hunter and his team of vigilantes

“You will be arrested, you will be charged, and you will go to prison for this,” Hunter tells the man sternly, revealing how he shared indecent images with them under the assumption of sharing them with an underage girl. – Stinson Hunter, 31, Unemployed Vigilante. (The Mirror, Online)

On Wednesday evening, disgraced television station Channel 4 aired a new documentary of a vigilante group of self-named ‘Paedophile Hunters.’ Three young men called Stinson Hunter who changed his original name from Kieren Parsons, Grime and Stubbs, the idea is that the young guys lie online and pretend to be underage teen girls to groom paedophiles. Once arranging a meeting, the group, led by Hunter, then hope to film them and chase them down the road screaming to expose them to police and on the internet as potential sex offenders.

On their website, the group are not shaming paedo’s in a new tactics mission for good, they are simply being unruly thugs in their attempt to tackle this growing crisis. While the need to expose paedophiles is necessary, where appropriate, ordinary citizens of the public cannot simply run around at free will doing as they wish. Certain acts they have done have also broken high protocol and laws which police should now investigate.

Wanting to catch a paedophile for ‘sport’ sends a terrible message to society which is aimed to encourage them to become vigilantes and abuse ordinary members of the public they disagree with because they have not analysed content thoroughly enough. Their only sole focus is to text someone online and ask them an initial question. Not listening or analysing their response which could be genuine, they aim to set out to expose every message as paedophilic and the like thereafter already assuming they are paedos.

These actions are as perverse as being a paedophile. But who will argue with them?  Everyone including press, police and politicians, who should be dealing with it will naturally, turn a blind eye. But they also shoulder some of the blame, too. For years these actions have encouraged people to become more obscure and think they can take matters into their own hands. When they should deal with such measures they instead ignore it for politically framed ideology often conflicting the job of an actual journalist/politician or investigative professional.

Three young lads running around amok, causing public anarchy akin to rioting and pub crawl mentality is simply abhorrent behaviour. Their actions directly influence the denotation of thuggish people to go out and attack people and cause harm to ordinary members of the public under their warped versions of suspicion.

paedo film

It is the sole action of the police authority to deal with and act accordingly with these claims. Instead of a name and shame option, if the police are failing at catching them, then it is the police who need to re-train its approach. It is not down to three young lads on the prowl, using EXACTLY the same techniques as a, and therefore in retrospect, using the entire values of a paedophile instead.

Let’s be clear, this is no “To Catch a Predator” CBS Dateline likening. There is no invites, discussion or explanation of their misdeeds paedophiles could be causing. The three guys are as brash and sickening as they come. Calculated, coarse and crass, their actions threaten the very notion of liberal democracies and the subject of civil society.

Many cases in the UK have seen innocent men killed and abused by thugs because they “looked at a boy/girl” when passing down the street.

Let’s also be clear. This is another senseless ‘attack the internet’ rhetoric. Newspaper press, who are failing to sell and struggling to migrate online, have found an easy cause to target. Failure to adapt online and stuck in a 1920s – 1950s approach to writing, the internet, which no-one can regulate to profit from, is ‘a source of all evil.’ Yet as we all know from any type of media source, this is a platform for use, just as is television, mobile devices, radio and the like. It is neither good nor bad and a neutral platform.

Trying to gain a level of fame and re-integration into society since being a CONVICTED CRIMINAL, Stinson decides instead to interrogate his now victims, which causes some level thinking audience watchers to even have symphony for a paedophile. Hunter served time in jail six years ago as a convicted woman beater. This article is completely neutral in that respect, and we fully endorse what paedophiles do is wrong and sickening, but we cannot allow personal upset to allow society to call for a public destruction of immoral behaviour conducted by the aggressors of exposing those types of wrongdoers.

In an except from the Daily Mail, online, they added of Hunter’s past –

Parsons, 32, who served a custodial sentence for arson as a teenager, has been disowned by relatives.

His grandmother, who asked not to be named, said: ‘Keiren has caused a lot of trouble for the family. We have disowned him. When he was about 16 or 17, he ended up in prison for burning down a school.’

Next we will have people attacking ordinary citizens because they had a certain ‘look’ where they seem to be a paedophile. Any man with child could soon be accused of being one because a thug chav watching saw the pair playfully smile and touch each other. These are the intense problems this pitiful attempt at Stinson becoming a public hero/celebrity causes at large.

The way they attack people online, purposely going after random targets and tricking them by pretending to be underage girls/boys is immoral. On their site, they have exposed the conversations and other messages, which see them abusing services. They have decided to infiltrate gay dating sites as well, continually assuming that gay men are paedophiles, which is entirely wrong and inaccurate. Why, in the first place are you tricking gay men, who have been cast out of society, to boost your celebrity profile and destroy lives for a bit of fun?

This is where blurred lines are becoming more and more intoxicated with public discourse.  Such actions are disgraceful and of high distaste. Anything could happen to these people who could well be innocent in cases of mistaken identity. All the hunters need is one text that is ‘suggestive’ to frame a certain way with a certain, calculated question from the paedo hunting cartel.

Stinson even admits he created a profile of a 15 year old girl to entrap people. They even get their phone numbers and label them ‘Nonce’ in the text as a contact to put online for exposure with pictures of them. The group also pretend to be underage boys ‘not out’ using the social inacceptance to homosexual men as a trick to cause comfort from others with such understood hardship from their perspective, which society continues to defame. They then take photos of their legally-aged sex life from profiles or texts and simply post them as levels of revenge attacks, which is again, unethically acceptable. This is also a level of what is actually called TROLLING. No-one has seemed to mention this at all. The art of trolling is when you lead someone on, and then hunt them down to post pics and information about them in which you get enjoyment from ruining their lives for own and group watching amusement.

When the group hear something they disagree with to their cause, they purposely choose to target them in response, which causes another level of muckraking abuse which is against the law and ethically incorrect which again exposes these vigilantes as anything but and causes them and their ‘cause’ to become entirely perverse itself. They even targeted a female ‘anti-child abuse campaigner’ too. She spoke out against the guys and tried to close them down. The group decided to post and attack her in a vicious revenge attack online instead. This can be classed as hate speech, which is also a crime.

What we as a society are dealing with here, is not the exposure of paedophile’s but the expose of a group of disillusioned vigilantes who want to attack anyone they dislike and use the premise of branding them the most sickening term possible. Yes, there are some who genuinely are and while that is a very high cause for good to bring into the national conversation, this is not up to, nor is it correctly implemented by this trio of hunters using the exact same measures of paedophiles themselves. Society is now going to become more obscure and an assumption that everyone who is genuine is one of these men, due to the insecurities of three lone rangers, distorted from society itself, with a one-way view that ‘paedo’s are all online’ which isn’t always the case as many are around schools and parks offline.

paedo trap

The choice to attack specific targets and gain their private information proves that this group are planning to cause upset and destroy people’s lives for the sake of their own satisfaction that they ‘f*cked up’ someone’s life with the highest stain on their name because they didn’t like their actions as a gay man or other type of life choice or religious belief, for example. That is also classed in a form of hate preaching defamation.

Hunter also again stigmatises the welfare pool of society as bad. Unemployed, a former drug addict and a convicted arsonist jail serving criminal brands all welfare claimants as bad, when many are good and in struggling poverty across the United Kingdom.

The chats are only shown from a certain point of the conversation, not the very beginning, which casts a shady view on the dark side of the vigilantes, carefully posting constructed messages that suit their cause. They don’t use any pictures as a profile on chats from their end, either. This is simply a method of wake up, who can we get today? Let’s try this chat site today. See if we can get anyone. They are not waiting to be approached; they are specifically targeting people for their fun game of sporting boredom. They have expanded to all platforms of Social Media, too. Even as these ‘kids’ the group send suggestive messages back to encourage a sexy or perverted conversation including kisses and talk of being “a virgin” to encourage sexual conversation. The group even send genital pictures, including penis pictures in their measures to entrap people. The pictures are not of the group and are sourced, clearly from elsewhere, possibly search engines and are stored on the group’s archives with mobile phones and ‘cloud’s’ which exposes their shady tactics. Another point made in the documentary was that a girl on an 18+ website contacted them. Underage people and including the Hunter using it as such, posing as teen girls, is also wrong on their part.

Dating itself, in today’s society is even more difficult as we develop over time, but having infiltrating abusers ready to meet people to attack them is not acceptable in any circumstance. This group need to be arrested and pulled down by Metropolitan police. Their actions are entirely wrong, even if they try to justify this as a good cause. This is the job of the police and all material should be handed to them to deal with. It is their job to deal with precisely and with the technology and capabilities to act or not.

Based on their assumptions only of how the dating world has changed and sending of explicit messages has become the state of societal change, segregation of communal groups and individuals. With a biased view from people like Hunter, who view it as not likable text content, is now the way others communicate, whether liked or not. It is not up to a lone ranger to react with a level of action that can place anyone in danger of substantial risk, even if there disingenuous ‘don’t harass them’ is going to encourage others to do so, which is their aim. Based on Stinson’s own views without any moral thought and simply a ‘hear one story’ scare tactic and also on the verge of stalking, is just as sickening. Uneducated vigilantes with nothing in their life attacking those who have something, to justify on a moral backdrop of ‘protecting kids’ which is the framework for such celebritism is just as disgraceful. Yet another question must also be discussed of the fact this country is entirely sexually repressed and this has stoked up the entire discourse with attitudes and actions with sexual interactions. Furthering the tactics of turning the screw is the same level, just in a pick a side’ mentality to excuse any abuse you can get away with because you were ‘on the good’ side. No-one is above the law.

The group further their spin calling themselves ‘investigative journalists’ which is nothing of the sort pertained to the title and is therefore fraudulence. This is not journalism at all. They are in no shape or form NGO’s and the like. They are clear, outright vigilantes, hunting for sport and fame. Malicious and unreserving at causing risk to those who may or may not be offenders from Stinson and Co. do not care about anything in society other than being a paedo hunting machine. This machine removes them from understand what is a ‘right or wrong’ process and their only defence is without any rationale to say ‘they are paedos’ including those hounded who may not be. Assumptions do not guarantee truth. This neglect places the trio in the same bracket only one tier above the paedophiles themselves. We have to talk and act about cases in rational debate, not sole one man missions, removing himself from all responsibility.

This is simply another act of scaremongering.

From Channel 4’s perspective another attempt to buy into their brand of ‘Born Risky’ is tacky at best. This, like stigmatising people on benefits with inaccurate portrayal (where a second series is on its way) was only for ratings. The failing TV station with low ratings in general since new management overtook the once popular channel a couple of years ago, has no shame in accelerating its ‘creativity’ with programming. Uncreative and simply perverted, 4’s creative bigwig Jay Hunt has continually destroyed the inside halls of Channel 4. Her and the team’s approach is all about ratings and not ‘being risky’ in the slightest.

From the perspective of the media, any story that helps to attack the internet and raise statistics for the struggling industry doesn’t make them insightful or unique. People will read the story because it is around, not because it was new and original. If you are ever going to sell and raise stats, that’s what they want. They only read it because it is there. Then they don’t have anything than a mild reaction or rant, before it is fish and chip wrapper.

Clearly what we need to address, is why girls and boys as young as this age, have sexual tendencies. Then we have to understand why the UK has the highest rate of teen pregnancies. Why girls have such low self-esteem and are ‘prepared’ to sleep with anyone at first sight is alarming. With over-sexualisation in TV shows such as X-Factor, and the continual struggle with poverty in the UK with benefit cuts, continue to keep families and people in this position. None of these issues have been addressed in this programme, nor pockets of wide spread media. Why it is now considered by some as the norm to sleep with underage kids who are ‘giving it away’ needs to be addressed as much as any potential paedophile. And then there is the final question. What constitutes a paedophile? Are women not paedophiles too? Only men? This archaic approach continues to prove that Britain as a society and a country in the world, will continually remain backward, with a lost generation who never achieve, because all is held down or put back on ‘shock factor’ tendencies without taking a two way perspective to any debate or situation. Only fuelled with personal spin and assumption of disgust, with lack of information, this country is being pulled further into the depths of despair for many a future to come. These pitiful shows for a ratings buzz do not help, nor support this under any measure. It is in every word, shameful.

Whilst chaperoned on a sting, police officers found the interactions of these hunters a disgrace and had huge concerns over his methods.

The domino effect mentality also rained down as the three, chasing one suspected paedophile down the street called him “paedo” encouraging motorists to stop and join in, in a mob mentality of defamation based on no evidence whatsoever. Whilst the show might have it, the street collaborators did not. Once the evidence is collected, there is no full sustainable proof that some are paedophilic and that any are built with strong clarity or credibility. Unreliable chance opportunities from the lowest common denominator in society have not helped criminals who seek a second chance in society.

stinson

This has branded all criminals as ‘once a criminal, always a criminal’ with such mind-set values thanks to Hunter’s loose portrayal of sustainability. Convicted criminal Stinston broke down in the documentary after the chase, crying adding this was “vindication” of his own previous crimes. If the trio cannot reform their attitude, then perhaps behind bars is the best place for them.

Many people who do these actions are usually people who have been involved with or had an instance with something they felt is paedophilic. As a result they ‘turn’ on everyone around them, distrusting of all in society because of their own insecurities. They need counselling, not internet and TV shows. He later adds he witnessed abuse while growing up in a children’s home. What a surprise. While this is not acceptable, you cannot go off on your own crusade against people of the public without any evidence at all. Then you cannot simply ‘create the evidence’ much of which is highly linked to being viewed as fabricated or uncredible.

Former chief executive of CEOP, Senior police officer Jim Gamble, said to the company filming, “Some people with very low training have proven just how easy it is to go out there and catch individuals. Very quickly they are shooting fish in a barrel. The fact of the matter is this – that needs to be done by law enforcement.”

IMAGES

The Mirror

Daily Mail

Channel 4

Cheating Google co-founder shacks up with 27 year old colleague

Google co-founder Sergey Brin’s estranged wife claims the couple had a “happy home life” one year before their breakup.

Anne Wojcicki, 40, revealed their family picture crumbled beneath them as Mr. Brin, also 40, is now dating a 27 year old employee, Amanda Rosenberg. Rosenberg had previously dated an employee also, before Brin.

brin anne

Rosenberg, a head executive of the privacy invading Google Glass contraption, which can record anyone’s movements on camera should a user point their glasses at you, and uploaded live to YouTube, previously dated colleague Hugo Barra.

The relationship entanglements where all over Google’s Google+ network where support flooded in from colleagues for Barra.

Brin.

Billionaire Brin.

Home-wrecker Rosenberg worked closely with Brin, who owns $22bn (£14billion) of revenue. The pair worked together closely on the evil Google Glass project. Cheat Brin had dated Rosenberg whilst still in his relationship with his wife.

Google was earlier in the year embroiled in a scandal over it’s failure to pay tax revenue in tax avoidance with offshore accounts paying less than it should have.

Intrusive. Rosenberg and her Google Glass spy camera.

Intrusive. Rosenberg and her Google Glass spy camera.

Google recently staged another themed ‘week’ on YouTube giving false illusion that people could create videos for the theme in which it only pre-planned using celebrities, actors and people from established mainstream television programs to can users to create ‘Geek’ videos. Since then Google’s YouTube had deleted or blocked certain people’s video’s and also chose to use excuses against ordinary folk for speaking out on disagreement with the themed series. This prompted YouTube’s vision under Google to be seen by many as corrupt within its bitter employee’s abusing people’s rights and ailing to delete videos exposing their privacy not wanted uploaded in certain clips.

GOOGLE YT

Google are seen by users as taking personal issues to heart and abusing their rights to hurt and spitefully attack users of the website.

Remember, don’t be evil.

IMAGES

PC Mag

Eduhacker

Google Plus

Frugal Glasses

Google Glasses invention prompts rivals to follow in footsteps and invade privacy further as a cheap mechanism for profit.

Image

This is the Telephony One.

Image

So this is the future. Evil Google’s Glasses to public spy on people, which it may feed back to NSA and others, but regardless of that, this is a complete violation of human rights and privacy for profit. Every company and country should be banning the devices, not creating them. Google also have function that allows you to record and stream on YouTube live which is simply outrageous when Google will invade your privacy live and not allow the video to be removed, despite your concerns when you may eventually see it, which will be too late after the abuse flies through.

If they launch these devices then it is my suggestion that every country in the world should ban this frugal glasses of any kind. With many perverted people choosing to use camera devices to film up women’s skirts, record someone against their will to post online and cause abusive hatred as a fun sub culture and invade sauna’s, gym’s and lockerooms to secretly record people’s private bodies is profound and unwillful.

Any country or company that allows this device should be ashamed of itself and could eventually cause a mass political disaster for the abuses attached to it globally. There is no need for Frugal Glasses in a world full of camera’s, another potential reason why so many teens commit suicide or are shamed for doing certain behaviours. This applies to the older generations too.

IMAGES

dogtownmedia

GigaOM.wordpress

17 year old public sex act blames the internet

A 17 year old schoolgirl was caught giving oral sex to a reveler at an Eminem concert in Ireland. During this photos were taken of the explicit act and posted online where the girl was “distraught” to have gone viral. They were posted on Facebook, Twitter and filmed up to YouTube. All accounts were soon deactivated. She was said to be seen giving oral sex to TWO men and given a sex act on herself by another guy. All were separate intervals.

The police are said to be investigating and are attempting to class this as child porn for filming and photographing the images as she is under 18, technically.

This choice has caused numerous newspapers to heighten the drama for their own political agenda and blame the internet for piling on abuse and using the recent two deaths in the media shamefully to the online attack in order to protect David Cameron’s ideology in attacking the online space.

So allow me to explain the situation.

You cannot blame the online world for this female doing this deed when SHE did an act in a public open space around numerous people in the middle of them. She must take responsibility for her reckless actions and offensive behavior in public.

These images are not child porn and at 16 years of age she is technically an adult and should be responsible for her own choices. She engaged in sex, which was her choice and chose to do so in front of many in a wide public open space.

Usually if in a public place, this can be subject to people being arrested for indecency and even given ASBO’s (Anti Social Behaviour Order) in extreme cases.

Image

The bottom line is this is her responsibility and her shame she must live with and has nothing to do with the online world, so think about things beforehand. The Conservative governments advice is to shut down and isolate numerous sites that are presenting journalism because places like the Daily Mail newspaper is running scared of losing its print format to the online world, of which newspapers will be a fuller part of in ten years or less. Moving in the police on a technicality to support a personal ideology is the biggest disgrace to this country in general, and the law cannot be cheery picked as and when any politician sees fit when the fault lies with the female and gent receiving.

One source from the Independent said: “She has recently spoken with police, along with her parents, but has not filed a formal complaint. It’s unclear what steps will be taken next: in Ireland, 17 is the age of consent but as VICE notes, sharing pornographic images of anyone under 18 is child porn (so even if she participated in them consensually, anyone who shared the pics performed an illegal act).”

The law is above choosing to protect indecent behaviour and yet any adult doing so is reprimanded. These privileges are what encourage and are “corroding childhood” allowing young members of society to willingly misbehave and blame others for their crimes. The law on this should be re-looked at and up for review as this penalises others, as intended when they are not in any way shape or form involved with child pornography. The country continues to be broken, as a result, from crime fiddling laws.

The Independent also added more than 50 arrests were made at the concert.

Also, then, that means the Daily Mail and all other media that shared the image in its main stories should now be charged as they have shared “child porn” or are newspapers allowed to get away with this, yet a freelance journalist like oneself would be cuffed and collared for doing my job? Talk about favouritism and lawful vilification in society.

IMAGES

The Independent