Welcome to Nazi Britain

Welcome to Nazi Britain

ff GE2015 copy

Over the last five years, Nationalist Nazi David Cameron attempted to rule with an Iron Fist over the United Kingdom.

After using almost all policies transparent to Nazi war criminal Adolf Hitler, 70 years on from the liberation of Nazi Germany, the United Kingdom elected Cameron to totalitarian rule once more.

Failing to secure a majority five years ago, Cameron this time secures a slim majority barely past the required mark of 326 seats to form a parliament. Cameron received this due to offering bribes on everything in every sector to con electorate members unsure of the fear of economic collapse and genocidal tendencies with the welfare state.

Using his levels of propaganda in the state media with personal attacks, lies, editorial disposition for public endorsement which should see those implementing fired, bolstered a scaremongering surge to convince voters through fear.

Since 2010 with vile and evil benefit cuts, and increases, many suicides have risen across Britain under Cameron’s genocide akin to the Nazi gas chamber executions of Jews, Gay people and non-Ayrian race ‘blue eye, blonde hair’ requirements.

The man who made his fortunes from a wealthy father and a high level of slavery profits, continues to use The Queen and Nationalism to continue his dictatorship.

The so called Christian, who has committed genocide, thrown people out of their homes through taxation and made them homeless in scores and food poverty with the increase of food banks has severely questioned those faux values he claims.

Cameron had also allowed secret plans to make law for 3 people to create a freakshow child in a petri-dish with three parents.

Many are calling for electoral reform after the current system is broken and a huge section of the public choose not to vote for lacking belief of the politicians creating their own laws to rule over any disagreement in the UK.

Since 2010 the Conservatives have secretly changed multiple laws unfairly to their way of thinking and entrap any law abiding citizen who does not agree with their values. Their inability to conform to a new market, including the online world, demonised as evil because they cannot monetise from it, have tried to change everything to their biased way in totalitarian structure defaming Britain as a whole.

With multiple lies and Australian script writers for his speeches guiding him along has seen Cameron lose intense credibility.

While disgusted at the change in democratic values, former co-alition partner Nick Clegg tendered his resignation, but kept his seat among just 8 Liberal Democrats from 57, taking a wipeout in the polls. Labour leader Ed Miliband also abdicated his position in a charismatic speech, also congratulating Cameron. Miliband remains in his seat. A third leader, in a shock triple resignation of party leaders saw Nigel Farage of UKIP, who failed to win a seat, resigned.

Many UK citizens plan to leave the country to overseas nations and contribute to their economies instead.

Other’s feel unrepresented and fear cuts for being poor through no fault of their own after David Cameron is said to be ‘out of touch’ with how people really live.

Cameron who views the world on PR trips to Africa holding starving black babies, believes that this is poverty and that the UK has none. The economy, which fixes itself, has grown a tad but the Conservatives stole the credit for being in sitting office at the time. Their projections of borrowing, spending and foreign aid has soared in billions and trillions.

It has also cost billions to introduce a system to throw off benefit claimants of a measly £70 every two weeks, funded by the taxpayer and secretly kept from the public announcements, crippling democratic process.

Throughout the campaign, Cameron avoided all debates, bar one, dictated rules and what questions he will ask and has cheated the system, to which The Queen should have dealt with and vetoed Cameron on the democratic process. She failed to do so and is the COUSIN of David Cameron. Many UK citizens believe she has let the country down by failing to interject in a ‘one-off’ rules of voting where she has done nothing for her country in her final years.

After 70 years of culling the Nazi regime, to restart one again, is not only shambolic but a disgrace to how far we have come in modern years.

While no-one wants to admit it, (who does?) allowing the festering problem to grow is an outrage that allows the rich to destroy the public with a modern Gestapo and police state with a totalitarian rule which cannot credibly claim honour among, literal, thieves. All for a few pennies to the poorest people who need a hand, which is what the welfare state is for. The rich fat cats who blame poor, sick and disabled people for trying to live lives in a problematic situation through no fault of their own is shambolic.

With no support, Cameron’s out of touch assumption that people are at home all day not doing anything and “scrounging” off the state with a nasty witch-hunt on the poor has been abhorrent and morally wrong.

Yet he has not sanctioned any in his constituency nor working tax credits where workers are getting more benefits that unemployed people.

Cameron has also initiated unfair apprenticeship schemes which don’t pay, do not secure work after a trial and has no career prospects. If any are failed to be taken after they impose them on you, with menial job options of no future, they will penalise you unfairly. 1% of benefit claimants were said to be wrongly claiming, which were weeded out from 2010 -2011, yet the Tories still abused the system. They employed companies and self friends to profit from the trade deals of hosting providers and also duplicated the same job advert 10 – 50 times, meaning those jobs did not exist.

With no support, abusive government and plans to attack the poor continually, will cripple the United Kingdom socially and lead to social unrest.

If Cameron had any sense to try and hold a legitimate run as PM then he needs to drop the benefits culls and support fairness in society. Lacking this, Cameron will face extraordinary national unrest everywhere, no matter what biased laws are put into place.

With another absurd pledge of £12bn to the NHS which is not available and offering a £2bn cut to welfare now increased to £12bn is not possible to make the fantasy projections. With only £2bn at the most in welfare, £10bn must come from elsewhere.

The cost of living crisis and the cuts to welfare forcing people into suicidal genocide from Cameron has continued to make the rich richer and the poor poorer. With no wage and forcing people into work that doesn’t pay, has no wage to match the living crisis and cuts to income unable to survive two weeks for the next payment, Cameron is treading a fine line to political death as much as the country itself.

Launching the Snooper’s Charter to spy on citizens continues the stark reality of a disgrace on the commemorations on the 70 year VE Day liberation to continue the totalitarian state.

Rushing into legislation and personal policies of no value, Cameron has got the biggest task on his hands. How to create the fairness he so preaches, when attempting to penalise everyone instead. He needs to seriously figure out a new perspective if he ever wants to stand tall with the public. A few votes and surrounded by a Westminster bubble of yes men won’t add any focus to Mr Cameron and his lacklustre policies or campaign.

Time to get your act together.

Advertisements

Tory welfare abuse causes another suicide

Tory welfare abuse.

Order Of Truth

nhamWelcome to the caring society.

Sadly, Malcolm Burge, 66, killed himself after desperately trying to get help when he was presented with a bill for £809.79 from Newham Council in London after changes to his benefits.

Mr Burge was pursued by Newham Council after his housing benefit was slashed from £89.39 to £44.75 per week, and the council failed to implement the changes immediately due to a backlog in processing the benefit changes by the council. Mr Burge continued to receive the higher amount, which the council sought to recover from him.

Mr Burge had tried to rectify the situation with the council, writing to them and telling them he was “depressed, stressed and suicidal” and “I have no savings or assets. I am not trying to live, I am trying to survive. I can’t remember the last time I had £800.”

Letters were presented at the inquest into his…

View original post 742 more words

Strictly Come Dancing 2014, Week 10: Around the World

Strictly Come Dancing 2014, Week 10: Around the World

tess claudia 10

This week’s Strictly special is an around the world theme. ?! Back are the judges Craig Revel-Horwood, Darcey Bussell, Len Goodman and Bruno Tonioli. Our score is also in brackets, giving clarity than stupid overmarking. Hosts Tess Daly and Claudia Winkleman are back to present.

What is with the extras?! Strictly have added four extra dancers on the floor with every dance couple. Why? If you wanted them then why didn’t you hire them to begin with. They take away from the couple and the show as a two people dance. Idiotic.

 

Pixie and Trent

Viennese Waltz

Tulips from Amsterdam – Max Bygraves

scd 14 pixie 10

Our first destination is The Netherlands. Dancing around windmills with clogs and long white robes, Pixie and Trent set us off to travel. Trent dances in arms with the other male dancing extras and follows twirling Pixie, handing out Tulips. This took away from the dance. In hold was decent with good rotations. Footwork clean but tad awkward at times minorly. Smooth gliding along. Too much of Pixie on own, breaking what a Viennese Waltz is, surely? Spins Trent to the floor instead of Pixie who is supposed to be on the floor. Might be different, but did not work as bet intended. Stupid. Pixie still playing very safe and not going the distance.

The judges’ comments are not being looked at this week, because they are still talking a load of biased rubbish.

9, 9, 10, 10 (8)

 

 

 

Mark and Karen

Salsa

Viva Las Vegas – Elvis Presley

scd 14 mark 10

Time to fill the slots. Mark jumps off the judges stage and instantly turns around wiggling his bum. Stands with hands on hips as Karen is turned around. Weak arm moves as a female extra suggestively rips open Mark’s shirt from behind. If all else fails get out your tits aye BBC? Mark then gyrates on the floor in his knees to Karen. No enthusiasm or energy in hand shakes. Tired and lost in turns on floor when lifting Karen. All teeth and no substance. Limp and lacking.

Bruno up talked Mark’s “pelvic thrusts” in yet another perversion critique.

Interesting how all the BBC rely on is Mark’s body, yet for a ‘hunk’ he has no definition and his body is average. Like two aspirin on an ironing board. The BBC’s attitude to sex is second to none, it would seem.

7, 8, 9, 8 (7)

 

 

Sunetra and Brendan

Rumba

Girl from Ipanema – Michael Bolton

scd 14 sunetra 10

Off to Brazil now. Sunetra romances two extra male dancers as Brendan stands behind. This was stupid. Sunetra then joins Brendan and slowly moves around him as Brendan steers her into the other guys. Back with Brendan Sunetra let’s herself go a tad with a sultry back glide down. Decent movement around floor with arms and slow sexy walk. End with Brendan watching from afar. Good try from Sunetra but still holding back and way too timid. Needs to really let go and forget who is watching and just go for it. Lose the inhibitions.

5, 7, 8, 7 (7)

 

 

 

Caroline and Pasha

Charleston

Istanbul – They Might Be Giants

scd 14 caroline 10

Caroline begins on spot very well with legs and arms though bit too long. Pasha then joins behind steading her. Good flip over lift with kick outs above shoulders. Good leg in/outs with timing. Pasha flung down into a rowing boat of the extra dancers for no reason. Ends with Caroline lifted above all extras and then crowd surfed back to Pasha flipping over to end on amazing spectacle of lift. Still lacking full oomph though.

9, 10, 10, 10 (9)

 

 

Simon and Kristina

Waltz

Edelweiss – The Sound of Music OST

scd 14 simon 10

In Austria now. Tender start to the floor. Smooth steps in starting whirl around. Good footwork. Good interaction between two. Finally went outside of box ticking and made a near perfect dance. Very good show tonight. Only frustration is people like him only do this at the most crucial stage of the competition where they may be eliminated so close to the top.

9, 10, 10, 9 (9)

 

 

 

Frankie and Kevin

Jive

Surfin’ USA – The Beach Boys

scd 14 kevin 10

Lowered onto the floor from a surfboard Hawaiian shirt Kevin show off his legs with Frankie. Strong but slightly cluttered leg arounds in fast pace a struggle for Frankie to keep up. Good feel, but still little limp. Frankie has the look and the legs, but again holding back as all a little too sweet than pushing with full oomph. Taking it very easy. Got the kicks and flicks ticked off.

9, 9, 9, 9 (9)

 

 

 

 

Jake and Janette

Argentine Tango

Zorba the Greek

scd 14 jake 10

Greek Taverna plate smashing now. Jake starts mood with good clap solo with strong footwork. Good dip down of Janette. Set theme instantly. Good lifts and elevation on Janette above knees. Excellent flip over between legs in hold. Strong gauchos. Extras join. Accidental bump into extras. Finishes strong with plate smash. Proof extra dancers should not have been there.

Craig commented on the dance clashes. It was only one. Not that we excuse it either.

5, 8, 8, 8 (8) (Wasn’t that low.)

 

The vote is now crucial as the six couples will go to next week’s quarter finals.

 

The BBC don’t seem to respond well to criticism. Taking pot shots and bitter jibes were simply pathetic. The BBC allow it to happen. The BBC should stop being pety. It’s not like any of us have allowed systemic abuse to allow sexual predators including a paedophile to abuse thousands of people from their BBC dressing room, is it? Be mature. The best way to silence a critic is to appeal to them not pic on them with sad jibes that mean nothing. It continues to prove the BBC is full of abuse. They need to sack Louise Rainbow and her bullying team that encourage such behaviour, especially on a family show. Oh, and if you would like to take pot shots, missy, here’s one for you. How many failed programmes are attached to your name? One and Only, The Farm and others that have all been cancelled, especially not even getting a second series, if you would like to spout vitriol. How very professional of you. A complete failure at all reality TV programming. Good job!

 

 

Best dance of the night?

Simon and Kristina

Danger zone?

Sunetra, Jake and Frankie

 

IMAGES

BBC

TV Review: The Paedophile Hunter

Web vigilantes: The threat to civil society.

Stinson Hunter and his team of vigilantes

“You will be arrested, you will be charged, and you will go to prison for this,” Hunter tells the man sternly, revealing how he shared indecent images with them under the assumption of sharing them with an underage girl. – Stinson Hunter, 31, Unemployed Vigilante. (The Mirror, Online)

On Wednesday evening, disgraced television station Channel 4 aired a new documentary of a vigilante group of self-named ‘Paedophile Hunters.’ Three young men called Stinson Hunter who changed his original name from Kieren Parsons, Grime and Stubbs, the idea is that the young guys lie online and pretend to be underage teen girls to groom paedophiles. Once arranging a meeting, the group, led by Hunter, then hope to film them and chase them down the road screaming to expose them to police and on the internet as potential sex offenders.

On their website, the group are not shaming paedo’s in a new tactics mission for good, they are simply being unruly thugs in their attempt to tackle this growing crisis. While the need to expose paedophiles is necessary, where appropriate, ordinary citizens of the public cannot simply run around at free will doing as they wish. Certain acts they have done have also broken high protocol and laws which police should now investigate.

Wanting to catch a paedophile for ‘sport’ sends a terrible message to society which is aimed to encourage them to become vigilantes and abuse ordinary members of the public they disagree with because they have not analysed content thoroughly enough. Their only sole focus is to text someone online and ask them an initial question. Not listening or analysing their response which could be genuine, they aim to set out to expose every message as paedophilic and the like thereafter already assuming they are paedos.

These actions are as perverse as being a paedophile. But who will argue with them?  Everyone including press, police and politicians, who should be dealing with it will naturally, turn a blind eye. But they also shoulder some of the blame, too. For years these actions have encouraged people to become more obscure and think they can take matters into their own hands. When they should deal with such measures they instead ignore it for politically framed ideology often conflicting the job of an actual journalist/politician or investigative professional.

Three young lads running around amok, causing public anarchy akin to rioting and pub crawl mentality is simply abhorrent behaviour. Their actions directly influence the denotation of thuggish people to go out and attack people and cause harm to ordinary members of the public under their warped versions of suspicion.

paedo film

It is the sole action of the police authority to deal with and act accordingly with these claims. Instead of a name and shame option, if the police are failing at catching them, then it is the police who need to re-train its approach. It is not down to three young lads on the prowl, using EXACTLY the same techniques as a, and therefore in retrospect, using the entire values of a paedophile instead.

Let’s be clear, this is no “To Catch a Predator” CBS Dateline likening. There is no invites, discussion or explanation of their misdeeds paedophiles could be causing. The three guys are as brash and sickening as they come. Calculated, coarse and crass, their actions threaten the very notion of liberal democracies and the subject of civil society.

Many cases in the UK have seen innocent men killed and abused by thugs because they “looked at a boy/girl” when passing down the street.

Let’s also be clear. This is another senseless ‘attack the internet’ rhetoric. Newspaper press, who are failing to sell and struggling to migrate online, have found an easy cause to target. Failure to adapt online and stuck in a 1920s – 1950s approach to writing, the internet, which no-one can regulate to profit from, is ‘a source of all evil.’ Yet as we all know from any type of media source, this is a platform for use, just as is television, mobile devices, radio and the like. It is neither good nor bad and a neutral platform.

Trying to gain a level of fame and re-integration into society since being a CONVICTED CRIMINAL, Stinson decides instead to interrogate his now victims, which causes some level thinking audience watchers to even have symphony for a paedophile. Hunter served time in jail six years ago as a convicted woman beater. This article is completely neutral in that respect, and we fully endorse what paedophiles do is wrong and sickening, but we cannot allow personal upset to allow society to call for a public destruction of immoral behaviour conducted by the aggressors of exposing those types of wrongdoers.

In an except from the Daily Mail, online, they added of Hunter’s past –

Parsons, 32, who served a custodial sentence for arson as a teenager, has been disowned by relatives.

His grandmother, who asked not to be named, said: ‘Keiren has caused a lot of trouble for the family. We have disowned him. When he was about 16 or 17, he ended up in prison for burning down a school.’

Next we will have people attacking ordinary citizens because they had a certain ‘look’ where they seem to be a paedophile. Any man with child could soon be accused of being one because a thug chav watching saw the pair playfully smile and touch each other. These are the intense problems this pitiful attempt at Stinson becoming a public hero/celebrity causes at large.

The way they attack people online, purposely going after random targets and tricking them by pretending to be underage girls/boys is immoral. On their site, they have exposed the conversations and other messages, which see them abusing services. They have decided to infiltrate gay dating sites as well, continually assuming that gay men are paedophiles, which is entirely wrong and inaccurate. Why, in the first place are you tricking gay men, who have been cast out of society, to boost your celebrity profile and destroy lives for a bit of fun?

This is where blurred lines are becoming more and more intoxicated with public discourse.  Such actions are disgraceful and of high distaste. Anything could happen to these people who could well be innocent in cases of mistaken identity. All the hunters need is one text that is ‘suggestive’ to frame a certain way with a certain, calculated question from the paedo hunting cartel.

Stinson even admits he created a profile of a 15 year old girl to entrap people. They even get their phone numbers and label them ‘Nonce’ in the text as a contact to put online for exposure with pictures of them. The group also pretend to be underage boys ‘not out’ using the social inacceptance to homosexual men as a trick to cause comfort from others with such understood hardship from their perspective, which society continues to defame. They then take photos of their legally-aged sex life from profiles or texts and simply post them as levels of revenge attacks, which is again, unethically acceptable. This is also a level of what is actually called TROLLING. No-one has seemed to mention this at all. The art of trolling is when you lead someone on, and then hunt them down to post pics and information about them in which you get enjoyment from ruining their lives for own and group watching amusement.

When the group hear something they disagree with to their cause, they purposely choose to target them in response, which causes another level of muckraking abuse which is against the law and ethically incorrect which again exposes these vigilantes as anything but and causes them and their ‘cause’ to become entirely perverse itself. They even targeted a female ‘anti-child abuse campaigner’ too. She spoke out against the guys and tried to close them down. The group decided to post and attack her in a vicious revenge attack online instead. This can be classed as hate speech, which is also a crime.

What we as a society are dealing with here, is not the exposure of paedophile’s but the expose of a group of disillusioned vigilantes who want to attack anyone they dislike and use the premise of branding them the most sickening term possible. Yes, there are some who genuinely are and while that is a very high cause for good to bring into the national conversation, this is not up to, nor is it correctly implemented by this trio of hunters using the exact same measures of paedophiles themselves. Society is now going to become more obscure and an assumption that everyone who is genuine is one of these men, due to the insecurities of three lone rangers, distorted from society itself, with a one-way view that ‘paedo’s are all online’ which isn’t always the case as many are around schools and parks offline.

paedo trap

The choice to attack specific targets and gain their private information proves that this group are planning to cause upset and destroy people’s lives for the sake of their own satisfaction that they ‘f*cked up’ someone’s life with the highest stain on their name because they didn’t like their actions as a gay man or other type of life choice or religious belief, for example. That is also classed in a form of hate preaching defamation.

Hunter also again stigmatises the welfare pool of society as bad. Unemployed, a former drug addict and a convicted arsonist jail serving criminal brands all welfare claimants as bad, when many are good and in struggling poverty across the United Kingdom.

The chats are only shown from a certain point of the conversation, not the very beginning, which casts a shady view on the dark side of the vigilantes, carefully posting constructed messages that suit their cause. They don’t use any pictures as a profile on chats from their end, either. This is simply a method of wake up, who can we get today? Let’s try this chat site today. See if we can get anyone. They are not waiting to be approached; they are specifically targeting people for their fun game of sporting boredom. They have expanded to all platforms of Social Media, too. Even as these ‘kids’ the group send suggestive messages back to encourage a sexy or perverted conversation including kisses and talk of being “a virgin” to encourage sexual conversation. The group even send genital pictures, including penis pictures in their measures to entrap people. The pictures are not of the group and are sourced, clearly from elsewhere, possibly search engines and are stored on the group’s archives with mobile phones and ‘cloud’s’ which exposes their shady tactics. Another point made in the documentary was that a girl on an 18+ website contacted them. Underage people and including the Hunter using it as such, posing as teen girls, is also wrong on their part.

Dating itself, in today’s society is even more difficult as we develop over time, but having infiltrating abusers ready to meet people to attack them is not acceptable in any circumstance. This group need to be arrested and pulled down by Metropolitan police. Their actions are entirely wrong, even if they try to justify this as a good cause. This is the job of the police and all material should be handed to them to deal with. It is their job to deal with precisely and with the technology and capabilities to act or not.

Based on their assumptions only of how the dating world has changed and sending of explicit messages has become the state of societal change, segregation of communal groups and individuals. With a biased view from people like Hunter, who view it as not likable text content, is now the way others communicate, whether liked or not. It is not up to a lone ranger to react with a level of action that can place anyone in danger of substantial risk, even if there disingenuous ‘don’t harass them’ is going to encourage others to do so, which is their aim. Based on Stinson’s own views without any moral thought and simply a ‘hear one story’ scare tactic and also on the verge of stalking, is just as sickening. Uneducated vigilantes with nothing in their life attacking those who have something, to justify on a moral backdrop of ‘protecting kids’ which is the framework for such celebritism is just as disgraceful. Yet another question must also be discussed of the fact this country is entirely sexually repressed and this has stoked up the entire discourse with attitudes and actions with sexual interactions. Furthering the tactics of turning the screw is the same level, just in a pick a side’ mentality to excuse any abuse you can get away with because you were ‘on the good’ side. No-one is above the law.

The group further their spin calling themselves ‘investigative journalists’ which is nothing of the sort pertained to the title and is therefore fraudulence. This is not journalism at all. They are in no shape or form NGO’s and the like. They are clear, outright vigilantes, hunting for sport and fame. Malicious and unreserving at causing risk to those who may or may not be offenders from Stinson and Co. do not care about anything in society other than being a paedo hunting machine. This machine removes them from understand what is a ‘right or wrong’ process and their only defence is without any rationale to say ‘they are paedos’ including those hounded who may not be. Assumptions do not guarantee truth. This neglect places the trio in the same bracket only one tier above the paedophiles themselves. We have to talk and act about cases in rational debate, not sole one man missions, removing himself from all responsibility.

This is simply another act of scaremongering.

From Channel 4’s perspective another attempt to buy into their brand of ‘Born Risky’ is tacky at best. This, like stigmatising people on benefits with inaccurate portrayal (where a second series is on its way) was only for ratings. The failing TV station with low ratings in general since new management overtook the once popular channel a couple of years ago, has no shame in accelerating its ‘creativity’ with programming. Uncreative and simply perverted, 4’s creative bigwig Jay Hunt has continually destroyed the inside halls of Channel 4. Her and the team’s approach is all about ratings and not ‘being risky’ in the slightest.

From the perspective of the media, any story that helps to attack the internet and raise statistics for the struggling industry doesn’t make them insightful or unique. People will read the story because it is around, not because it was new and original. If you are ever going to sell and raise stats, that’s what they want. They only read it because it is there. Then they don’t have anything than a mild reaction or rant, before it is fish and chip wrapper.

Clearly what we need to address, is why girls and boys as young as this age, have sexual tendencies. Then we have to understand why the UK has the highest rate of teen pregnancies. Why girls have such low self-esteem and are ‘prepared’ to sleep with anyone at first sight is alarming. With over-sexualisation in TV shows such as X-Factor, and the continual struggle with poverty in the UK with benefit cuts, continue to keep families and people in this position. None of these issues have been addressed in this programme, nor pockets of wide spread media. Why it is now considered by some as the norm to sleep with underage kids who are ‘giving it away’ needs to be addressed as much as any potential paedophile. And then there is the final question. What constitutes a paedophile? Are women not paedophiles too? Only men? This archaic approach continues to prove that Britain as a society and a country in the world, will continually remain backward, with a lost generation who never achieve, because all is held down or put back on ‘shock factor’ tendencies without taking a two way perspective to any debate or situation. Only fuelled with personal spin and assumption of disgust, with lack of information, this country is being pulled further into the depths of despair for many a future to come. These pitiful shows for a ratings buzz do not help, nor support this under any measure. It is in every word, shameful.

Whilst chaperoned on a sting, police officers found the interactions of these hunters a disgrace and had huge concerns over his methods.

The domino effect mentality also rained down as the three, chasing one suspected paedophile down the street called him “paedo” encouraging motorists to stop and join in, in a mob mentality of defamation based on no evidence whatsoever. Whilst the show might have it, the street collaborators did not. Once the evidence is collected, there is no full sustainable proof that some are paedophilic and that any are built with strong clarity or credibility. Unreliable chance opportunities from the lowest common denominator in society have not helped criminals who seek a second chance in society.

stinson

This has branded all criminals as ‘once a criminal, always a criminal’ with such mind-set values thanks to Hunter’s loose portrayal of sustainability. Convicted criminal Stinston broke down in the documentary after the chase, crying adding this was “vindication” of his own previous crimes. If the trio cannot reform their attitude, then perhaps behind bars is the best place for them.

Many people who do these actions are usually people who have been involved with or had an instance with something they felt is paedophilic. As a result they ‘turn’ on everyone around them, distrusting of all in society because of their own insecurities. They need counselling, not internet and TV shows. He later adds he witnessed abuse while growing up in a children’s home. What a surprise. While this is not acceptable, you cannot go off on your own crusade against people of the public without any evidence at all. Then you cannot simply ‘create the evidence’ much of which is highly linked to being viewed as fabricated or uncredible.

Former chief executive of CEOP, Senior police officer Jim Gamble, said to the company filming, “Some people with very low training have proven just how easy it is to go out there and catch individuals. Very quickly they are shooting fish in a barrel. The fact of the matter is this – that needs to be done by law enforcement.”

IMAGES

The Mirror

Daily Mail

Channel 4

Vilifying sex leads to shame and abuse

Vilifying sex leads to shame and abuse.

With recent issues on sexual identity and problems stemming from it now ,in the past and certainly the future, why is sex such a taboo subject for society?

Perhaps it is because newspapers like the Daily Mail and other Conservative politicians have stigmatised the ‘idea’ or ‘image’ of sex to be only a reason for procreation. Many of them feel we are only here on this Earth to procreate, and class sex as a boring, missionary act to spawn a child.

Anyone not engaging in ‘traditional values’ is then vilified and classed as dirty, shameful or disgusting for unlocking their sexual identity and giving into their natural desires.

The more people attempt to block it, the more people will end up doing it and when they do they will do it in the wrong choices through lack of information or communication in an open forum.

With no one knowing how to tackle sex and teaching it minimally in schools with a conservative approach causes ripples for a one way standard which doesn’t represent reality causing others to head out into the big wide world and make choices that could be unhealthily with sexual infections, or giving away precious sex, such as virginity to anyone they see or like for two minutes as a charmer.

Preparing people for sex is key and if they vilification of people having sex from those who are not engaging and out of touch with reality was more efficiently presented, then many would have responsible sex and there would be less ‘dirty’ tags surrounding it meaning less abuse, shame and “slut-shaming” when sex happens. Sex is a precious and tender time which should, and is usually respected between two consenting parties. It should not be classed as dirty in anyway when it is a natural order. Adopting this stance would “protect the children” more from suicide, bullying and low self esteem.

Big Brother UK, week 10 nominations

Big Brother UK,

week 10 nominations

With one week looming toward the final, Big Brother UK cast its final nominations.

Luke S won a free pass to the final last week (see below), as Sara and Luke A sailed through as they received no nominations. Only those receiving at least one nomination, which the show already did last week, saw Ashleigh, Adam, Scott and Deena all face the public vote.

The show revealed one week before the final that there will be a double eviction after numerous teasing and not following through. Viewers cannot fathom as to why this never occurred. The answer is simple, Channel 5 were scared they may not have any people left in the house if they threw everyone out, or that the show would have no spark to continue watching, where most viewers were outraged and turned off after Benedict Garrett was evicted, closely followed by outside Lydia Louisa. Lauren Carre’s unwarranted boot was a final straw. The show has suffered immensely since treating bullies, racists and verbal abusers favourably to maintain a number of housemates instead of a quality output.

Ashleigh is a favourite to leave the house. Deena Uppal is bookmakers favourite to win, though some predict her downfall on Friday. Clearly it will be Ashleigh and Scott who shall leave. Viewers still remember when Scott (and Ashleigh) joined the reprehensible Caroline Wharram in their schemes of gameplay and abusing housemates in the process to survive.

Both were reprimanded for Indian stereotyping

Leaving nothing to imagination, Sara on launch night

On Friday Becky Hatton was evicted from the house. In the show’s “shock twist” they chose to reward two abusive housemates Luke S and Conor McIntyre a chance to walk away with a free pass to the final or a £50,000 reward for pushing a button first. Neither had to push the button and could return to the house. McIntyre wanted to reach the final he claimed, as Luke S aimed to press the button in a cocksure manner of egoism Conor slyly pressed the button after agreeing to sidestep for his counterpart.

Luke S threw items and “fixtures and fittings” usually seen in Big Brother to be unacceptable behaviour resulting in immense punishment, go unpunished, as McIntyre took the money from the winner’s prize fund leaving the other 50k in play.

Conor’s Cash

Big Mac, ‘personal trainer’ Conor, looking a picture.

With Olympic fever the country were united and rejoiced with a nation’s might of winning, dedication, passion, desire and achievement. In Britain, at Big Brother, we rewarded an abusive, racist, thug who threatened to “punch her” and “stuff” certain items including her grooming products “up her ****” numerous expletive comments to her genitalia. This happened early on in the series and Big Brother UK took no action on it. Previous housemates were met with eviction in such cases.

Conor’s transcript that ‘earned’ him £50.000

On his interview, quizzed by host Brian Dowling, McIntyre took no remorse for his comments and aimed to defend his actions stating Deena was awkward to live with. McIntyre had numerous levels of awkward living with almost every housemate he didn’t “like” and often attacked furniture in angry episodes of attack.

Con-man claims he was right

Big Brother production staff and porn owner, Richard Desmond, who also owns newspaper the Daily Star (enough said) highlights the lack of understanding to the product from older variations aiming to run it for a youthful market, distorting reality to form teens who support abusive housemates as role models due to nationality or postcode and create abusive people in society, also claiming “racism” to the nation of Ireland, which is not racism, its nationality.

Viewers claim Desmond is “distorted from Reality”. Do You agree?

The fact kids throw around the lethal word of racism and assume it is a debatable opinion on a housemate, seen on a product, with distorted levels of uneducated persons aiming to attack anyone as a result of a comment that has scope forces the reality of this word to become extremely dangerous. Someone needs to oppose, shutdown or rehire a new production man/crew. I’m available; by the way to form the product credibly or just let it leave peacefully as no good can ever come off of this mockery that is all aiming to sell Desmond’s smutty newsparper alone.