BBC GE 2015 Debate: Austerity Must Go!

Second Leaders debate with BBC: five leaders, one chicken

and an absent whining baby

ff bbc debate copy

During the Election debates on the BBC in the second of special debate programmes leading into the General Election 2015 for the UK, five of the seven main party leaders participated.

They were Ed Miliband (Labour), Nicola Sturgeon (SNP), Leanne Wood (Plaid Cymru), Natalie Bennett (Green) and Nigel Farage (UKIP).

Live-Election-Debate

Sitting leader of the country David Cameron (Conservative) previously issued an ultimatum to broadcasters and snubbed their offer, dictating to them he must not participate. They also added that the leader Nick Clegg (Liberal Democrats) not appear. Deputy Prime Minister Clegg did not turn up, despite having his own mind, supposedly. He claims the Conservatives, also known as Tory’s, secretly blocked him from appearing afraid he would reveal all the dodgy secrets of the Tory party over the last 5 years involving immense systemic abuse. Cameron also demanded he not be upstaged with ’empty chairs or podiums’ on the set. They were not used by the BBC and only 5 podiums were on display with the appearing leaders.

The debate focused on many issues and covered a lot of ground in an hour and a half with all leaders looking impressive in their own right, even if disagreeable. Cameron and Clegg looked like fools, sitting at home using responses to try and win in pre-fabricated statements made in advance alongside the biased press backdoor deals. They also sent statements online, which proved they were still involving themselves in the debate, which is shambolic to avoid.

Took bold choice to debate among absent dictators.

Took bold choice to debate among absent dictators.

Nicola Sturgeon and Ed Miliband agreed on multiple issues, but were divided over a coalition pact for now. This may change as the country expects a likely coalition government due to the changing nature of politics since Cameron sold out with Clegg in 2010 after failing to get elected. Labour leader Ed Miliband wanted to take his chances at gaining a majority in the election. Should this fail, SNP’s Sturgeon is offering a deal for the benefit of the country to rid the country of the evil totalitarian Tory governmental corruptions and abuses with austerity.

Also in the debate, a shockingly surprise move came from Nigel Farage, who seemed open to Labour at one point, launched an unprovoked attack which has cost the UKIP leader dearly. Without Cameron or Clegg, Farage attempted to be Alpha Male of politics and sideline Miliband. Farage failed to understand the only way to be electable from a political perspective is to join with them to get their ‘foot in the door’ and build politicians by 2020. Rebuffing this idea, Farage could eventually peter-out and lose his stead by 2020. It made UKIP lose its position of common sense to utter delusion and nonsense political play.

Green Party leader Natalie Bennett also opposed austerity as did Leanne Wood. Both put in good statements but failed to follow through effectively on plans fuller to make enough impact by trying to simply ruffle feathers which contradicted their own policies somewhat in part.

Green Leader Natalie Bennett put in another credible performance, but needs the extra mile push.

Green Leader Natalie Bennett put in another credible performance, but needs the extra mile push.

Though Sturgeon clashed with Farage over immigration as UKIP’s one key central policy, to abandon the EU to solve immigration, was Farage’s only bargaining chip for votes, sinking like a lead balloon. Farage failed to be comprehensive and at one point verbally attacked the audience of specially chosen voters by an independent panel/company unaffiliated with politics or the broadcasters. Chair of the debate David Dimblebee also pointed this out. He called the BBC left wing standards, after which the audience, under fire, did not appreciate.

For years the BBC had been led by ex-Conservative politicians who abused their position of political neutrality by offering biased news reports daily to favour Conservatives. It also hid multiple scandals over the years, including the infamous Paedophile scandal involving Sir Jimmy Savile, closely affiliated with Conservative governments and given access to abuse and rape children in hospitals and on sets at the BBC. The BBC workers admitted it was told to “turn a blind eye” when seeing Savile accost his victims on set and in his dressing room.

The BBC is funded by the taxpayer, the public, to produce content in their name, which is under scrutiny for failing to be of political neutrality.

David Cameron, ever the opportunist for a public statement, carefully edited and presented, said of the debates it was “part of the deal that was done to unblock the log-jam about TV debates” and was “delighted that I played a role unblocking that log-jam”. He said all participants in it were arguing to “abandon the plan that has turned this country around and has got us more jobs, more livelihoods and more business”. Mr.Cameron only joined in ONE debate with, as all seven leaders, hoping they would take the heat off of his tough questioning on ruining the country in the last five years. He has been urged to join in all debates to which Cameron has snubbed so he doesn’t look bad as he feels he cannot publicly defend his non-achieving five year term in office. He continues to control state media and news broadcasters in his favour.

Cameron has failed to meet one pledge of his many made in 2010-2015 and everyone has been a personal one to him, offering no democratic value to the people who may have voted for him in 2010.

Ed Miliband once again offered Cameron the chance to join in and debate him one on one, which the supposed leader of the country said was over and done with.

Farage looked like he was picking fights, but did try to be the one who ‘spoke about the stuff people won’t speak of.’ (Which is actually what FalseFabs is doing.) Farage also chose to follow up on his first debates’ controversial comments about health tourism involving HIV treatment. He said immigrants came to get diagnosed and receive up to £25,000 worth of drugs to help. The public did not buy his demonstrations, as they put it.

Controversial. Farage in trouble loose HIV explanation again.

Controversial. Farage in trouble loose HIV explanation again.

One important stat to also explain is that in London alone, an average of roughly 20,000 men were quietly diagnosed with HIV, both gay and straight in 2010-2015 under the coalition government (Conservative and Liberal Democrats). This demonstrates how many people society and David Cameron have truly failed in ‘brushing it under the carpet’ to look good. They do not plan to do anything further.

Bennett made strong cases but didn’t back up enough impact this time around. She offered jobs, climate change and public services to be saved. She challenged the public to “change the establishment.”

Sturgeon outlined the end of Austerity and to get the country moving again with a communal aspect of society, which was welcomed by many.

Miliband also came out on top with Sturgeon over protecting the country from threats, helping working families and look after the young members of society growing up in middle age from 30 onwards. Miliband has also been a key champion in protecting the vital NHS health service, which the Tories plan to privatise.

Strong, bold and feisty. Sturgeon on fine form outlining austerity end for honest British people.

Strong, bold and feisty. Sturgeon on fine form outlining austerity end for honest British people.

Wood may have been an extra on stage, but pressed hard on issues to show no pushover, well. The problem was she chose the wrong targets and couldn’t feasibly back up those claims.

After the debate the Tory party were given full stage support and not pressing on any statements over the TV debate even though their leader failed to join.

Any one party or leader who does not appear on a political TV debate scheduled for the General Election which requires the public votes from the electorate is shambolic and no politician has the right to tamper with bribing officials. The fact Cameron has done so means he should be struck off from being elected AND the party represented (Conservative) should be relegated from this year’s election as candidates.

May need to be called in to deal with totalitarian rule tampering with democratic process.

May need to be called in to deal with totalitarian rule tampering with democratic process.

It is unacceptable totalitarian Nazism rule which NO leader has the right to alter in a democratic process as the electorate need to hear the voices that are eligible for voting. No one has issued the policy and The Queen, who can develop a Royal Charter can, but has failed to do so, for her country. She is said to be a heavy Tory supporter and affects her political neutrality. She is also David Cameron’s cousin and meets him weekly for discussions, which affects her and Cameron’s position in office. She should make it law now. If she fails, then it should be imposed by Lord Neuberger and the Supreme Court imminently.

Child has had enough of Cameron as he tries another PR attempt before last fortnights debates.

Child has had enough of Cameron as he tries another PR attempt before last fortnights debates.

No-one politician should be allowed to abuse the system for political gain and like all ruling elites must be held to account. Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II need to do one last important act for her country, this would be it. Now is her time. Many regard her as a useless Monarch who only sits on a gold chair and does nothing but pocket salary from Tory handouts, which gave her extra income over the last five years also.

Should do something for her country.

Should do something for her country.

We are not Hitler’s children and the Cameron Youth Movement must not be allowed to interfere with the political spectrum under any circumstance in a democratic process. If politicians fail to act, then other institutions must intervene as soon as possible. Everyone else in the country is held to account except politicians and there is no excuse for tinkering with political injustice.

Cameron also famously hired ex-editor and biased spin doctor Andy Coulson, the first convicted criminal in the halls of Westminster Parliament as Head of Communications. He served a six month jail sentence, which included hacking a dead child’s phone for a news story, leading parents to believe the child was alive to access the messages.

IMAGES

BBC

The Mirror

The Guardian

The Independent

Daily Mail

Daily Record

Advertisements

UK TV debates for May 2015. All you need to know about the 7 key parties

The televised debates, all you need to know about the

strategic hold up by David Cameron

ff cover chicken dave copy

The televised election debates a month before the General Election in the United Kingdom have been heating up and getting very ugly behind the scenes.

Failed leader David Cameron of the UK Conservatives (Tory) Party, who never received a majority to be elected, needed to gain another party to push him into the seat of country leader. Cameron chose the Liberal Democrats in 2010.cam burnley

After some impressive debates in 2010 which engaged the electorate of voters David Cameron has over the last month dictated he will not do the next ones for 2015. The Tory, who has created a totalitarian state, including the ‘new age Auschwitz’ with abusive and immoral welfare reforms picking on the poor and most vulnerable in society has held televised broadcasted to ransom.

British Prime Minister David Cameron Visits Kazakhstan

Cameron has secretly struck deals with broadcasters to not leave an empty chair on the stage in debates Cameron refuses to take part in, which is for the voting public to gain an informed and democratic opinion on who to vote for.

Cameron has agreed to a debate allowing SEVEN parties, where only three-four main ones should be a part of. This is seen as an outlandish bully tactic to try and tear down Labour with a distraction of other parties to avoid his terrible track record.

uk-politicians-1

7 Party Leaders.

Since 2010 dictator Cameron has modified laws with the courts on own personal policies, victimised and indirectly killed benefit claimants, pocketed from the poor to make him and the rich wealthier and never achieved one policy set out in 2010. He has continually lied and increased spending borrowing and blowing our money he said he ‘do not have’ at the drop of a hat on international spending in the billions and trillions. In 2015 he spent Billions on cash on improving roads. Ground-breaking. Then there is the paedophile scandal in which Tory politicians are said to have allegedly covered up an expose of senior abusers within the political hub of Westminster. There has always been a scandal with the Tories almost everyday or week. Illegal fracking was also secretly covered up, rushed through the courts and told to press not to cover the stories. It has also been carried out in secret under people’s homes without their consent. Cameron also hired a former spin doctor who was found guilty of hacking dead girls phones, abused by paedophiles and the like, to gain stories at newspapers making families believe their children were still alive. Cameron as since tried to use these families to act sincere at covering up the scandal. He also planned to privatise the NHS, so that if you do not have healthcare or insurance, you will die. He has also tried to ban pornography, adding it “corrodes childhood” as an excuse to block the internet and spy on citizens. He has also secretly banned multiple website and also others accused of illegal streaming which was not illegal to try and say it was a level of piracy to throw a jail term at them because friends at music labels moaned to him for their failure to migrate to a digitised business online. He has done all this in secret without any press attention or public records. He has tried multiple attempts to gag the press and free speech wherever possible against him and his party, questioning how we can lead a democratic country allowing such freedoms of speech.

Cameron agreed only to take part in one debate with the seven leaders.  Now he has worked a deal to be interviewed separately by a selected interviewer who is closely tied to the Tory party values to issue propaganda with an easy ride, after he has pre-ordained statements from his spin doctors.

In the debates he is meant to be debating with other parties so the electorate (voting public) can decide who to vote for on their own terms. Cameron is not giving that option. Many have come to the realisation that Cameron cannot defend his astonishingly fascist principals track record of running the country into “Broken Britain” since 2010. The public who have since dubbed the lost called leader “ChickenDave” have lost respect for the biased totalitarian adopting Adolf Hitler’s ideology in politics.

chicken dave

Cameron has since blocked Nick Clegg, leader of the Liberal Democrats from going on to the TV debates worried that Deputy Prime Minister Mr Clegg will reveal the height of inside abuse from the Tory government after the Lib Dems joined their coalition which infuriated the public who did not want a Tory government. Clegg and his party had betrayed their voters against their keep policies including Student Fee hikes, forcing people into debt.

If the Lib Dems, Greens, the SNP (Scottish National Party) and even UKIP (United Kingdom Independence Party) realise that the Tories are their enemy which none of the public today really stand for in society they may increase their gains in seats, constituencies and respect. With Labour as the only party who plan to help the country and its residents with a fair society that Cameron lied about continually and failed to achieve any policy on, Labour are trying to right that wrong. Voting for them is a real chance at change for the better with trying to live your daily lives as best as possible with some service funding lowered in certain situations, rather than outright abuses.

For those parties, the only way they can start to gain and get elected is to keep an open mind in pairing up with Labour, as with so many parties and dimensional shift of voters wayward instead of one way, coalitions are becoming more likely.

The General Election takes play on May 7th 2015. The debates range from 26th March to the end of April.

Lord Ashdown, former leader of the Liberal Democratcs some twenty years ago added that David Cameron’s cowardice should not be allowed to take centre stage and bribe or bully broadcasters into changing their plans under a democratic rule.

TV debates have now become so necessary for the British public to see and speak or hear direct from their politicians that this is a non-negotiable necessity of the top three-four parties in politics. Most never ever see politicians, especially Tory one’s at all and have the right if politicians require their votes for power to represent them to participate and state their case for election of their lives and country. Anyone who does not go to the debates, all three, should be struck off and have their party they represent vetoed from the next General Election.

queen liz ii

Once called for “harmony” among the UK.

Politicians are not above the law, just as everyone else and must be held to account like the rest of British citizens. Especially if they are representing the good of the country. It should be enshrined into law and if Cameron fails to show up to all three as intended, including the one on one with Ed Miliband he should be thrown out of Parliament and the Tory’s must be banned from being voted for in the next upcoming General Election.

David Cameron cannot be allowed to turn a democratic Britain into a totalitarian Nazi Britain with his levels of insane propaganda and secret deals of neglect which destroys the fabric of a Great United Kingdom it once was. No ‘leader’ has that right regardless and considering the times we have moved on with in civilisation we do not need to be going backward x amount of years because the Tories fear losing power they never really had to begin with and abused the system based on their own neglect. This is not 1933 or 1945 and we are not Hitler’s children. That is outrageously unforgivable and most be dealt with. Though Cameron faces intense scrutiny after he is the cousin of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II of Windsor and she has failed to deal with any issues that affect her country as Head of State. While she handed power over to politicians, in rare cases as this she must intervene with a Charter that strikes off the Tories over the debates and Nazism rule of the past five years. If she or the Royal Family fail this, then what hope is left for this national country, once great, eroded into a desolate abyss which finally makes the Royal Family redundant for good. That truly will embody “Broken Britain” for generations to come, with even more social problems, anarchy and threats nation and worldwide. If ever there was a time to do one last thing to step up for your country, this would be it. Many regard The Queen as sitting on her gold chair, doing absolutely nothing for her country in times of strife. She meets Cameron weekly to discuss the state of the country.

IMAGES

Daily Mail

Huffington Post UK

Mashable

Daily Mirror

EU Omni-shambles. Cameron – My powers. EU – 2.1bn euros.

The European Union (EU) have landed a tough imposition on the United Kingdom. After claiming that the British economy is booming and David Cameron shamelessly flaunting it to all EU members, a request was made for more finance. The EU have requested a 2.1bn [billion] euros (£1.7bn) beginning on 1 December 2014.

ff EU CAMERON BILLIONS TO PAY copy

Many believe this was a direct measure to sting in Cameron’s tail after spurring an in/out referendum in 2017 for the UK to have a chance to leave the EU. Cameron, who is attempting to use the move to fight opposition Labour and fighting off clawing challengers with UKIP, failed to use the PR initiative constructively. Cameron is said to secretly wish to stay in the EU, but publicly used the idea to seem one step above Labour. Reneging on his policies with unfair bias in the past, Cameron is now fresh out of allies in the Tory party, the EU and in the UK with the people and indeed, FalseFabs.

cam eu

Spouting the British economy is on the up, the EU wants a slice of the pie. Gluttonous pig Cameron, who has rewarded himself, own politicians and blindly spent on overseas aid on whims for PR to ‘look good’ to the world’s crises has neglected all around him with the EU and the British people. He now also claims the UK are “leading the way” on the Ebola crisis to ‘get in first’ despite others contributing well with finance and aid.

Cameron, who continues to ignore the fact that the people in Britain are poor and need support, believed he could take the wealth and spend it on his own personal interests for the country. If he put it back into helping people than segregating them into working camps, he may just have been able to bypass this issue.

Cameron’s economic plan, to force young people into unpaid work, ‘voluntary’ schemes which failed under Cameron’s own policy (because they didn’t pay and had no career prospects) has now been merged into ‘Apprenticeship schemes’ instead. The economic plan, otherwise known as ‘sit still and hope for the best and claim glory when it fixes itself’ as a home-static motion, is Cameron’s only remaining clout.

Cameron has also gone his own way with a Totalitarian motion of propaganda to introduce a “British Bill of Human Rights’ a not so cleverly spun title to remove the rights from the EU which help the people who are abused by government forces. The replacement of a government controlled state, by the Tory Reichstag, sending out the Alter Kampfers aiming to get the Great British badge, rewarded by themselves is abhorrent at best. The authoritive perils of Cameron and Co. which rip apart the country instead of banding it together, attempts to exclude opposition politicians from the former Scottish independence vote, which are mostly Labour MPs. This would give the Tory Party every chance to make biased decisions and stall any parliament from a democratic process of issuing laws for the good of the country. Cameron claims the UK is a democracy and not a dictatorship.

cam tired

Glutton. Cameron enjoys the media walk with paparazzo.

What he wants, he gets. Well, he has lost that imperative with the EU by charging in and bratishly demanding change when he has done nothing to support change. It is no wonder the EU are not so keen to offer newer powers as they were beforehand some two years ago, when Cameron decided to penalise the poor and demand change or threaten a walkout. Cameron’s exit plan has no weight, and his failure to negotiate “one last go” after FalseFabs set the groundwork for change is a tentative, bullish attitude having no favour. Cameron, who rejected meetings of sustainable forces to ‘do it his own way’ in a completely juvenile act of self-egotistical appraisal has damaged the core of the EU-UK alliance. Even the EU had mentioned last week that Britain was one of the strongest countries in the EU. Cameron has ruined our presence in this committee. The irony is that since the UK changed the laws to suit their needs, now they moan that the EU are doing so. Only when it suits Sir David Cameron, eh?

For the EU, they should not judge the UK on the disgraceful actions of David Cameron and Nigel Farage and continue to hold an open mind. Change is on the horizon as Cameron will be de-elected from office in May 2015 during the next General Election. Then we will likely have a politician that is agreeable to conversation, negotiation and real change in Europe, not just a PR branded spin. The EU has always had a plausible relationship with the UK and though it is annoying to hear such aggression from today’s phony parliament, who could not win a majority of the election, keeps an open mind. At May 2015 it is very likely the country will change for the better and be rid of the “Nasty Party” of rich fat cats and out of touch with society hedge funded bureaucrats.

Divided. Demands from Cameron not too appraised by new EU President Junker.

Divided. Demands from Cameron not too appraised by new EU President Junker.

Cameron’s failure to include the British people on his behalf and adapt a careful and mild mannered approach does not sell the UK at this time favourably. Cameron is on the verge of not only continuing the Broken Britain notion, but to completely sever ties with Europe. We cannot run away when things get tough or don’t get our own way and spit out our dummy. Politicians are there to hold diplomatic relations when not always agreeable footing is present. Cameron has never once attempted this and it is too late. The best Cameron can hope to achieve is to keep Britain in strong relations with the EU, back his personal attachment up and ‘leave off’ while remaining an open door with the EU.

For a man who comes from PR, this schmoozing of European clout is a complete Omni-shambles.

cam outsider

Outsider. Cameron left with no-one to play with after ludicrous relations with EU as a whole.

As with the penny taking from the EU, as a pro-EU supporter, this is quite aggressive and harsh. While Cameron brags of the economy booming, the UK has had no wage increases, an NHS on the verge of implosion and benefit claimants stigmatised, stained as scum and led to suicide by indirect murders Cameron and Co. Their newest plan is to launch the Aktion T4 program, to destroy the mentally ill and disabled, all the while using propaganda with Cameron’s own disabled son and deceased son as political footballs for votes to seem human. The EU needs to be seen as giving something back if it is to take from the UK. While EU members may not like this, this is not aggressive nature; it is called being a part of the union and supporting one of the biggest members of the club. Let us not forget the UK has provided millions and billions of wealth to the EU and virtually asked for nothing for years. The free movement of people has seen Britain become a safe haven for many in troubled times, one of its greatest assets of virtue. The UK is a humble country, but is no pushover. Again, never judge us on the totalitarian ethics of Cameron and his cronies. This is not the democratic UK that has always remained in the UK, and this will return shortly. We must work together to retain British values in the EU and support for others. While some enemies of the UK in the EU club are likely to neglect this, at some point it is very likely the UK will be needed for your voting privileges and to give you ‘a voice’ which the UK supports as a democratic right. It is fundamental that we, as a union, though sometimes disagreeing, stick together and communicate better with an open mind regardless of policy disinterest. One country has their rules and while we may not fully agree, we can communicate to understanding one another’s culture much better with open dialogue. The irony is that since the UK changed the laws to suit there needs, now they moan that the EU are doing so. Only when it suits Sir David Cameron, eh?

IMAGES

Archbishop Cranmer

Business Insider

The Telegraph

Independent

Chris Grayling wants to make UK Totalitarian law bending Utopia over internet trolls

Grayling: Totalitarian Phantom laws for ‘trolls’ in Utopianist Britain raises systemic Governmental abuse

FF grayling trolls copy

Corrupt Justice Minister Chris Grayling has struck again at another attempt to abuse the laws of the United Kingdom to con their way into an election victory in May 2015.

Using the opportunity to try and gain votes from mothers and women over fears of online ‘trolls’ Grayling has instantly attempted to create any opportunity to trivialise law making by corrupt lobbyists of Westminster’s dark depraved halls. This is clearly an attempt to trap people into a jail sentence for those who are not these types of trolls and scaremonger and smear law abiding citizens with a strong opinion to trap them into a criminal punishment and stain their name. The ‘trolls’ they are attempting to ‘clean up’ Britain with are not trolls but over heightened abusive people online that lazy, out of touch politicians have scrambled upon a branding thereof. All due to different political beliefs, not with their ‘only us’ ways.

Yes, they need to be dealt with, but rushing and charging in all guns blazing with an empty law and no basis or thought will provide the corrupt UK Conservatives with another crippling blow in the future of the party. Already secretly changing laws in quiet and blaming the internet again and again in an attempt by idealistic Tories to ‘clean up’ Britain will once again damage and isolate the country and likely encourage more abuse than deter it.

Out of touch politicians never learn and think they can abuse the power from their personal choosing making the UK a new age totalitarian state.

Heavy Tory donor Lord Ashcroft, who shamefully funded David Cameron’s 2010 election campaign in secret, even told the Tories months ago to stop being complacent with their own selfish attitudes. Once again the Tories failed to listen to its most biggest and crucial donor let alone reform their attitude. Party politicians and donors have also defected to UKIP (United Kingdom Independence Party) instead, ruffling the Tory roost.

Politicians forget the public place them into office to represent the people of the country under a democratic process, not create an elitist club of out of touch, millionaire politicians trying to create an utopianist Britain based on shameful old age principals that fail to work in a modern age.

Not even one week old and Grayling jumped on a chance opportunity to attack online audiences and general members of the public over the Judy Finnigan rape row.

judy finnigan

Outspoken. Finnigan defended convicted rapist Ched Evans on talkshow.

Finnigan, a former daytime television host made blind sighted remarks about convicted rapist Ched Evans, who was debated as being allowed to play football again after his release from prison, appraisal. Her daughter Chloe defended her comments.  Both were soon given the ‘specialist troll’ treatment with high levels of abuse which we say is fully unacceptable for having an opinion. However, Grayling decided to use this as an excuse to make up a law which is entirely loose and ludicrous systemic abuse of the courts. He plans to amend the Crime Bill that currently exists, but fails to understand it does not exist, even if chaperoning legit law from the past. That clause is not legitimate and therefore irrelevant. Any defence can easily disregard it in the courts. Any judge agreeing based on personal attachment to it needs investigating into corruption of the court.

Finnigan and her daughter were told they would be raped by ‘trolls’ and Grayling decided to use her daughter Chloe to begin drafting a ‘Chloe’s Law’ to prevent trolls online. Chloe’s Law, which is entirely ridiculous, was a thought up, two minute lunacy with no depth or sustainable weight to law enforcement. Grayling went as far as to make outrageous comments that “cyber-mobs” are “poisoning” the UK and can face up to two years in prison instead of the already six month in place law. Clearly a level of personal hate in Grayling’s venomous tongue he adds they are “online terrorism” which is simply sickening for any minister to say. Trivialising such laws are a disgrace yet Grayling and pals fail to accept any attempt to stand back and think of situations or criticisms. It will not create a United Britain and continue to drive them further into going after people instead. Leading by example is fundamental with a level of rationality which is oblivious to the Tory enforcers.

Celebrity Chloe Madeley

Celebrity Chloe Madeley.

Finnigan’s daughter Chloe Madeley agreed the law needed updating to include Twitter and we agree. Thought it has to be in a controlled and rational drafting, not a personal hate which could also show that Grayling is ‘trolling the trolls’ with personal hate. Double standards do not lessen eh problem, only exemplify it.  Madeley added “I will always ignore the disgusting troll tweets I get because I honestly do not want to give them any attention. But the tweet in question took it to another level. There is a line where rationality ends and criminality begins. The person who threatened me crossed the line.”

When a ‘People’s Law’ is created it is often those who have died, been sexually abused to death, suicide or bullying in schools. Some include Aiden’s Law, Sara’s Law and others which are legitimate but often forgotten about by warbling ministers desperate to make up phantom justice on a whim.

Not only would Chloe’s Law be invisible and illegitimate, it holds no prosecutable standards which the ministers know but use their power to assume it will be made into a law. The internet is ungovernable, even if a law is enshirned by an establishment because you reside in a set country. That does not make it legitimate and therefore a defence is legal to challenge and disregard as such. Even enshrined into a law does not make it legitimate and further makes a laughing stock of the entire British Empire for such low thought and personal policy bias.

grayling

Grayling and his friends including fraudulent MP, who escaped prosecution Maria Miller, who stole from the state, continue to devise random laws to attack anyone they dislike based on strong views brought on by political wrong doing. They need to back up and think about their abuses. What they are doing is itself illegal and trying to justify it as ‘in power’ proves their systemic abuse. Trying to rush it to ‘get it in quick’ does not help anyone, as well as the fact that there are existing laws that already deal with most of their fantasy drafts.

miller con

Fraud forgotten. Close powered friends avoid prosecution.

miller sun

Excerpt from The Sun.

But they won’t listen. Therefore it is up to the courts to refuse them outright. Corrupt politicians believing they can do what they want and break the rules themselves is entirely disgraceful. In a democratic process and what used to be the greatest United Kingdom on fairness, principals and a liberal democracy, the politicians of the Tory party believe they can break it. Abuse of power when tampering with laws is outrageous and the public are not stupid as you would like them to believe. Should they fail to think long term about processes and stop attacking everything by a governing law, the courts should refuse all government interference.

The majority of laws have been systemically created by politicians who have bent the rules based on their personal opinions with a lobbying QC’s (Queen’s Council) and ministers. This is clear corruption. The government encourage it. David Cameron and his cronies who change the laws must remember, the electorate voted you in and these corrupt choices will continue to vote you out. You are not there by means of creating your own Totalitarian England. You are there to represent the needs of the UK and its residents that want their voices and rules heard, not any attempt to clamp down on people due to rich toffs in the Tory Party’s own distaste. Their attitude to multiple issues from their own assumptions is fundamentally destroying the UK with its citizens. Continuation on this will eventually create a civil war and rioting clashes if they are not careful and the government continue to disrupt the country to blame lower class citizens. In many cases it is to protect the business trading of mega rich companies who are friends of the politicians. Again, these corruptions are to support the needs of the few and not the many. All of which are good pals with the Tories, who need a job when they are voted out of politics for being bad.

The Tory party has been hit with numbers of scandals since 2010 including fraudulent expenses robberies from the taxpayer, in-party marriage affairs and infidelity on wives, the corrupt changing of laws to penalise poor people and online communities and taking away measly portions of helpful benefits to welfare claimants in desperate poverty.

trolls

To beat a troll you have to be a caveman?

If politicians were as noble as they should be from old age centuries required, they would start dealing with real laws on real criminals and abuses, than create fantasy ones on a ‘clean up’ Britain online. They never think or liaise with proper advisors of how a law is meant to be righteous and honest. Built on lies, people are bound to lie and cheat themselves aren’t they? Whose fault is that? The very ‘role models’ themselves dipping their grubbing fingers in the till getting away with it.

What ministers fail to understand are key concepts. Why the government, who shut people out of society, helps advance abuse from government abuses they get away with. Then there is the fact that clamping laws on people do not stop the abuse. The definition of troll is misunderstood by praying media and out of touch politicians. They should be liaising with people who have valid experience of over ten plus years of online communities (hint hint) as well as creating legitimate laws not tawdry ones that mean absolutely nothing. Abuse will continue to be widespread in offline as well as online communities and it has never been more important to teach kids and grown-ups too how to behave. Why have we lost the need for manners and self-control? Because the government has run around amok abusing the country for their own corrupt purposes which does not represent those who elected you into office. Such complacency is an outrageous disgrace that needs to be addressed and to treat this, politicians should lead the way. Instead they will be out for what they can get. Unless that changes, abuse will continue, because the government create such hardship and abuse. No-one chooses to wake up one day and willingly set out to abuse someone. There is always a reason or an instance, and the government do not want to figure out why it happens, they just want to wrongfully ‘lock you up and throw away the key’ for having an opinion. Some opinions ‘should’ be refined, but others are displaying how distressed people are with society. You can’t have it both ways. Everything is a compromise, but the Tories think they are the ruling Totalitarian elite and own everything they touch. That is the problem here. Even Midas came unstuck. They haven’t even been able to identify what a troll is. A troll is someone who winds you up for fun. The ‘super trolls’ who are calculated abusers and mimicking or hacking accounts are an undefined term which is what we are attempting to address here. If you are grown up and mature, then others will be. It really is that simple. There is no place in society with unfairness and that is a big problem in why cases like these occur. Wake up.

The laws that were changed to refuse legal aid to those who cannot afford representation against a baying state to penalise people based on taste is another fuller disgrace of corruption to a democratic country.

Years ago the Tories wanted to make the phrase and hashtag #ToryScum illegal because of people sharing opinions, non-malicious, about the politicians voted into PUBLIC office, failing the electorate in their hours of need, which means they are legitimately under scrutiny from those who elect them in the first place and they are public figures up for ridicule just as celebrities.

It is often staunch irony considering Tories break the laws and avoid sentencing furthering a lack of faith in the system of the British Empire let alone society. What has it come to when a farce from the Tories is that of trying to jail people for using ‘nasty words’ because of highly strung politicians who need to develop a thicker skin than running to the courts to create laws which are entirely set on abuse themselves?

One instance does not justify all, but the Tories use this as excuse to create such dissent. They are further creating hate and despicable standards as a result of law abuse. When things are unfair, no-one will recognise that as legitimate and therefore others are prone to breaking those rules from antagonisation of the shady and conniving hate fueled politicians. Personal penalisation has been rife and also landed the Tory plans for reform with welfare, forced labour and immigration benefit caps to become illegal. The Tories think they can surpass the law. No-one, including a politician, is above the law.

cam jolie

Cameron ‘dropped everything’ to chat and party with celeb in town Jolie over rape work.

Others see this as Grayling also protecting the needs of a rapist.

We are now content with locking up people with opinions that are worse terms than paedophiles, murders, rapists, fraudsters, burglaries and the like, which also goes against the law of freedom of expression, which Grayling plans to disrupt as a defence with his leaving of ECHR. That means you have no voice, say or defence against the Tories picking someone at random and choosing to jail them to serve as a Totalitarian message with its very own Gestapo at work. All because people who voted them in finally disagree with the politicians failing to represent the needs and add fairness to the country with its most vulnerable. The Tories own almost all media with its propaganda levels of Tory support in the press, especially. Freedom of expression is also a law and key fundamental principality of democratic process.

Grayling has also allowed colleges to ‘use excessive force’ to ‘disruptive’ inmates. In English, you can ruff them up and be okay from prosecution. Another level of systemic abuse. Inside suicides have increased in jail, quietly hushed up by Grayling and security services. Months prior a young man was ordered to be humiliated by an unnecessary strip search by police and meekly threw his underwear near the jumped up officer, waiting for any excuse to use a taser on the accused. He used it unnecessarily at the drop of a hat and had the gun pointed at the suspect the entire time when fully clothed.

Numbers average at more than six suicides a month. Britian’s crime rates, which the Tories lied publically as decreasing, face tough pressures with prison overcrowding.

Cameron, who made policies over rape very personal, sits with rape accused Tory speaker Nigel Evans.

Cameron, who made policies over rape very personal, sits with rape accused Tory speaker Nigel Evans, who reclaimed his job to current day.

Some tweets over Grayling’s attempt at vetting comments online, where ‘comment is free’ added –

  • #Grayling appears to have ambitions to jail everyone in Britain. He should start with himself.
  • Internet trolls face 2 years in jail under new laws. They might get a longer sentence without a lawyer #grayling
  • Prison overpopulation isn’t causing enough hardship, so #Grayling proposes we bung a few internet trolls in to make life really unpleasant
  • The scariest bit of the #Grayling proposal is the fact a politician doesn’t realise social media has a block or delete profile option.

 Source: Twitter.com

Yet there was no mention of the press being allowed to troll though. Why? The great Tory propaganda machine, perhaps? It never disagrees with the Conservatives, that’s for sure. Only The Guardian and the Daily Mirror are devoid of Tory influence. Tories never had many people disagree with them years ago because the thought they could shout them down with hardship and keep them poor. Now the electorate has risen up to be taken seriously and instead they try to supplant it down with abuse of laws. All because they don’t like the fact that people are telling them the truth of their failings and they obliviously think they are the be all and end all. A United Kingdom for them, not for others. Never the party of the people, all in it for themselves. Great Britain has always been ruled by a class system which never allows the UK ability to grow. If you are born poor, you will remain poor. The ‘aspiration nation’ is arife with false impositions. This is why the country will never grow and abuse from within will always continue, at the very precipice of the judicial system itself.

This is a law to combat cruelty – and marks our determination to take a stand against a baying cyber-mob. We must send out a clear message”.

– Chris Grayling. Justice Minister, UK.

IMAGES

Third Sector

Now Magazine

thetechjournal

James Kim

The Mirror

Phone Hacking scandal finds Andy Coulson guilty

Ex-editor and David Cameron’s Head of Communications found guilty of Phone Hacking. Partner Brooks cleared of all charges.

 

After years of the fallout from the phone hacking scandal which saw scores of celebrities and members of the general public, including a murdered teen used for information revealed a court verdict yesterday.

coulson brooks

It was revealed that David Cameron’s now ex-spin doctor, (Head of Communications) Andy Coulson, who the Prime Minister hired after his time from leaving the newspaper to a government aide was convicted. Coulson was found guilty by jury of a number of charges (listed below) after hacking confidential material of others. They included a murdered schoolgirl by the name of Milly Dowler. By accessing the information, the family were led to believe the deceased girl had used her phone and was still alive, when, in reality, she lay in a shallow grave.

At party together.

At party together.

The chilling verdict found him guilty of plotting to hack phones and are considering further charges of conspiring to commit misconduct in a public office. He now face jail terms as well. Coulson had a six year long secret affair with the editor of the paper conducting the hacking, now defunct Sunday newspaper News of The World. The sister paper of The Sun was later replaced by the Sun on Sunday.

Tory cabinet ministers and leader of the country David Cameron, who were warned at the time but arrogantly decided against public outroar said they were “extremely sorry” for his employment at Downing Street whilst trying to turn popularity from their neglectful decisions.

Shameful. Having tea with Dowler family in attempts to smooth over grief.

Shameful. PR PM having tea with Dowler family in attempts to smooth over grief.

Speaking in 2011, scandal ridden Conservative party leader Cameron said that if Coulson “”knew about the hacking at the News of the World, he will not only have lied to me, but he will have lied to the police, to a select committee, to the Press Complaints Commission and, of course, perjured himself in a court of law”.

Cameron once left his underage daughter in a pub after inviting the media to take ‘unknown’ pictures for press attention. A car soon returned to pick up the forgotten girl. The Tories are said to be bending the law in favour to gain mother’s votes at general elections.

The jury of eight women and three men decided to clear editor Rebekah Brooks, who many firmly believe was ‘in on it’ with Coulson, including their torrid working affair. Brooks, who rubbed shoulders with David Cameron, The Queen, Rupert Murdoch and others had strong connections and denied any knowledge or wrongdoing over the scandal. Other reporters and colleagues were cleared of the questionable charges.

After press campaigns of a public jury, the decision has now been met with upset. Insiders feel Brooks got away with it because she was a ‘woman’ and had jury sympathy. Her legal team was represented by David Cameron’s brother, who is a barrister. Brooks was said to have collapsed upon hearing the verdict and needed to be helped out of court by officials.

The jury are since considering a verdict on the remaining material until 11 June.

leveson

Since the case was revealed the now sketchy Leveson inquiry was launched to report on press ethics. Lord Justice Leveson laid out numerous suggestions on regulatory practices with media ethics to the press. The press regulation debacle, which drew up a Royal Charter in secret nd failed to display the ‘contract’ to the public domain and simply added it to the records as a doctrine of law was deemed inaccurate by all the press. Since then no press newspaper has willingly supported nor signed to the Charter, despite The Independent’s inclinations towards doing so before selling the paper off.

It is important that the press retain self-regulation, though must reform attitude to press ethic reporting based on attacking with political ideology and ‘free for all’ onslaughts of non-public figures. Adding a little taste to non public figures who make the news should be endorsed.

The press continue to favour self-regulation and press freedom. With the recent Egyptian Journalist jailings for seven years for doing their job and wrongly branded as supporting terrorist organisations for reporting responsible in a democratic society, journalists are needed now more than ever. Any level of regulation is a strain on the industry and its workforce. If politicians do not like what is reported. Mainly to cover up their dirty secrets, most notably the Tories, they should grow a thicker skin.

queen signing

If you do not like the reporting of your misdeeds when it is responsible, then don’t be corrupt. It is fundamental to hold all ruling elites to account with responsible journalism. Since then celebrity gossip and sex scandals of footballers, classed as trash, have been gracing front covers, causing a chilling effect on journalism as a whole. Protecting the government abuses is not what the tool of the press is and any attempt to regulate the law from ministers in future to hide such scandals should be rejected by the court and only allow independent bodies, judges or Head of State to consider changing the rules. Cameron has been changing the laws in secret since 2010 to this point and has restricted press reporting. The evil totalitarian leader plans to further attack Human Rights, online spaces and welfare claimants to protect big business and scandals.

Being this out of touch with Europe, the world and its own country is a shameful disgrace that undermines Parliament, the UK and the judicial system. After Home Office Secretary previously stated “Human Rights must be scrapped” with the European Union support, the UK is becoming a shambolic authorative dictatorship. The courts may have to intervene and stop governments abusing the rules. Perhaps the Tory Queen can do something right by her country for once and protect what was once one of the greatest nation states for Human Rights, ethics and Democracy in an already problematic world.

We’re saying nothing about the heavy rumour from insiders regarding the ‘keys in the fishbowl’ party with the Cam’s George Osborne, Boris Johnson, Brooks, her husband and Coulson, among others. Though many believe it true, amid tense speculation.

IMAGES

Vanity Fair

The Telegraph

jcwi.org

Free Media

The defamation of a journalist

With the recent democratic free speech laws up in the air in Great Britain, politicians and security agents are now working together to defame journalism.

The case of David Miranda, partner of the journalist Glenn Greenwald, who revealed the Edward Snowden leaks in The Guardian newspaper, was detained under section 7 of the terrorism act as he was boarding a flight to his home in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

miranda

‘Terrorist’ David Miranda

British government and the Home Office were said to have given the green light to arrest Mr. Miranda knowing full well he was not a terrorist. His crime? He had hold of some Snowden documents.

Great Britain, which is now using the only American excuse of “national security” to apprehend someone gave a “heads up” to NSA while David Cameron, who claimed we live in a Democracy, and Home Secretary Theresa May had no involvement they claim, but later revealed they were informed. Cameron, on his third holiday in recent months in Cornwall, gave the order, allegedly. Two GCHQ officials watched as media files where destroyed by the Guardian under an order from government and police.

Cameron was said to be –

  • David Cameron ‘kept abreast’ of detention of David Miranda, sources say
  • Theresa May briefed because police feared he carried ‘stolen information’
  • Brazilian was taken into custody by officials as he passed through Heathrow
  • U.S. President Barack Obama was also given ‘heads-up’ before he was taken
  • Scotland Yard said detention was ‘legally and procedurally sound’
  • The 28-year-old was held while on way home to Rio de Janeiro from Berlin
  • Mr Miranda is to launch a civil action over his detention
  • London agents took his drives, a computer – and even a video game
  • Guardian editor claims British agents entered newspaper’s London office

(SOURCE: usa.onlinenigeria.com)

So what does this do for the sector of Journalism?

The statement from arresting officials of Miranda, a freelance journalist, claimed he was doing journalistic work but not a journalist in order to defame him to send a message of fear to all journalists in line with the government.

Miranda was held for 9 hours under the Terrorism Act. Lord Falconer, former British lord chancellor who helped bring in the Terrorism Act 2000 has added “this was not what the law was intended for.”

t may

Home Secretary Theresa May

Every newspaper has a political agenda. All newspapers in Great Britain, except for the Guardian (Liberal) and the Daily Mirror (Labour) support the Conservative Party and carefully framework propaganda in their favour to win general elections.

David Cameron, Conservative, cannot control those two papers and therefore used regulation or law to clamp down and pressurise the reporting. Now, Cameron, who is trying to mimic Barack Obama, who is the most popular person in the world, hopes crawling to American agencies will help strengthen their bond.

ed snowden

Britain is said to spy on American citizens and America spies on Britain and both feed the information back to one another as they cannot spy on each other.

obama

Under Pressure.

NSA is also said to be working with data collection from Google and Apple.

By using spying methods and fear to collect information has a damning effect on the business of journalism and classing someone as not a journalist because they are not at a working title is shameful. Defaming journo’s based on political ideology and agenda’s to win elections is just as corrupt as Robert Mugabe, the recent Egyptian uprising and the claims of Vladimir Putin fixing elections.

Without journalists to report on the real issues and secrets to allow politicians to craft laws to slam them down and hide their corruption is nowhere near a democracy and ever closer to a Fascist state. After the Snowden files were destroy by police, The Guardian newspaper was dictated not to report anymore stories that could “endanger lives under national security.” This should also tell us something sinister. Just how damning and intrusive was the spying carried out by NSA on worldwide nations.

dave cam holiday

Sun kissed Cameron

Currently, in a totalitarian state, filled with surveillance and political scandal, journalists are needed more than ever. The defaming of someone not at a working title is disgusting seeing as the politicians and industry make it very difficult to hire someone in the field because they need personal lapdogs to win elections with favourable stories and abuse of the opposition, which also cripples the notion of journalism.

gestapo80

Politicians should be working in unison with journalists allowing them to report stories as is their job and will move the economy forward. Instead the image presented is a personal hitman in disguise, especially after police corruption was exposed, including stealing identities of dead children.

The Gestapo, Hitler’s personal army invaded ordinary citizens homes and premises in secret, at night to abuse, remove and contain secrets nearing the Second World War.

According to historian Rupert Butler, “From its creation in 1933 until its death in May 1945, anyone living in Nazi controlled territory lived in fear of a visit from the Gestapo…” (Source: WIkipedia)

Britain continues to remain broken and never independent.

IMAGES

BBC

Digital Spy

Audioboo

The Guardian

theblaze

Getty Images

usa.onlinenigeria

nannyknowsbest

 

The Big Society. A day in the life. 1:1

The Big Society. A day in the life. 1:1

 

Image

So today’s venture into the outside proved an interest into the so called ‘Big Society’  that David Cameron prattles on about in the United Kingdom in stabilising the country in a democratic state.  Built on many perplexing formations, today’s instance was delivered in two forms.

The first, sitting on the bus next to some middle aged man who after five minutes, decided to lean in and mutter in my ear. “How are you” he began. I was taken aback, as many common folk in London do not speak to one another, but I was pleasant to listen.

He prompted to ask me, “are you a chusti?” As a mutter of quietened tone and hard of hearing I lean further in asking for a repeat. “Are you a chusti?”

“What’s a chusti?” I naively reply.

“Do you go to church?”

“No.”

He decides instantly after to ask me if I can lend him some money for something I can’t hear what. Instantly offended and unsure what to think in a split second, he chooses to stop asking.

Just because a guy sits on a bus respectfully and bothers no one with dignity and grace does not mean they are a Christian, or even religious in any right. Why must I always endure other people’s issues when minding my own business? To top it all, when he gets off the bus, he pulls out a bundle of cash! Diabolical! Do I look like I have enough money to support myself, either? Yet asking me for a hand-out when the chieftain of benefits blitz David Cameron has rendered me poorer than poor? The cheek of asking me for a charitable donation that isn’t charitable and filled for your greed? That is what is highly offensive. Please do not bother me on public transport asking for money which I don’t have. Goodness sake. People wonder why charity organiser’s now get a rough ride.

 

ronseal

It didn’t end there, Boarding my second bus home, a youthful white gent approaches two English-Muslim teens if they would like a free education, “paid for by the government and you get a £10,000 grant for it”  he adds. The girls laugh him off and say no, they are already in education. He instantly walks past looking me up and down in a split second, as a white, British young male and dismisses me thoroughly. Thanks a bunch! What is this country now turning into? Free education for special demographic targets, yet any white Britons in decreasing numbers must be ignored? And you wonder why numbers in the BNP rose?

 

Shutting out ordinary citizens of white British origin is becoming a deadly minority. David Cameron’s ‘Big Society’ is excluding the hard working, or tough attempting business minds or educational beings unable to afford it shut down by the system to get quota’s up? This is a disgraceful attitude that is underlining a deadly society of fractured segmentation rather than unified support.

Source: Huffington Post UK

And before anyone chooses to moan in response. I have friends of all ethnicities and sexualities and have respect of  numerous  cultures. I take no sides in multicultural society, but I have stood by and allowed it to go unmentioned for centuries and this is unacceptable by the government, and I would say the same for any other societies or backgrounds I see in disrepute.

So the question is, what exactly is this ‘Big Society’ that David Cameron blurts out? Stating it “does what it says on the tin” what exactly is the message on the tin. Back in the days of rationing we never knew if the contents were baked beans, ambrosia rice/pudding or spotted dick! So, Mr. David Cameron, what exactly is in the tin?