David Cameron: The Bestiality loving sex criminal who legalised act in 2014 still guilty

David Cameron: The Bestiality loving sex criminal

who legalised act in 2014 still guilty

ff-cover-bestiality-cameron

After the beginning of the damning revelations in a new biography about David Cameron’s systemic corruption, Lord Ashcroft, a trusted Conservative peer and co-author Isabel Oakeshott, a well respected Sunday Times political journalist’s details unveil a more sinister side to the evil of David Cameron.

After the extraordinary revelation that David Cameron inserted his genitalia into a deceased pig’s head at University in an act of pure bestiality, when a teenager, it was revealed that Cameron’s government legalised the act of bestiality in 2014.

Even though this was used as a measure to protect Cameron’s prevision of sex with animals, David Cameron now publicly endorses such depraved behaviour. It highly contradicts Mr Cameron’s so called ‘attack on the internet’ by using excuses of the ‘Dark Web’ in which Paedophiles and animal lovers hide behind. Mr Cameron, who publically tried to block the internet and failed, used this ‘Dark Web’ as an excuse for such measures. Yet Mr Cameron, who is covering up a well known Paedophile sex ring among his Conservative politicians committing the acts over years of depravity, also condones bestiality.

That is what the Tory government now stand for. Hardcore sex with animals. Even Cameron participated. Though the act may now be legalised, Mr Cameron should be investigated and tried as the act which he committed it WAS illegal and that is enough to prosecute. Mr Cameron has committed many crimes including warmongering illegally, bringing criminals into No. 10 Downing Street and condoning  drugs and prostitution.

Lord of the Flies. Inserted Genitalia into dead Pig. Legalised Bestiality in 2014.

Lord of the Flies.
Inserted Genitalia into dead Pig. Legalised Bestiality in 2014.

Mr Cameron has failed in his duties as leader of the country and his totalitarian dictatorship, including the invasion of privacy and the unglorious Phone Hacking Scandal, involving innocently deceased teens and front page accusations of people committing murder on guess work proven to be untrue and believes he is above the law.

Mr Cameron, just like any other is not above the law and bound by Her Majesty’s Justice System. Conning his way into government to abuse law and hide behind a position of abused power not only disgraces the country, police and law, but her Majesty’s Services to country too. David Cameron is not above the law and must be held to the full account of it. He has committed crimes plain as day and this is unacceptable. Scotland Yard must act in order to restore balance in the service, nation and the simple fact of dealing with crime.

Below we will show images of such crimes including Bestiality. If you are offended please look away. This is done with a heavy heart and necessary to make clear the depraved abuse that takes place and should not bypass Mr Cameron’s criminal actions he condones. Him and his Conservative Party ENDORSE this kind of behaviour. We didn’t do it, Mr Cameron and his government did. Cameron has yet to provide any statement on the issues raised by Lord Ashcroft and Miss Oakeshott’s compellingly truthful account of corruption. The hardcore action has been graciously covered.

WARNING! *GRAPHIC IMAGES*

pig

sheep copy

dog 2 copy

1 copy

dog copy

horse copy

goat 2

GOAT copy

IMAGES

Sources undisclosed

Advertisements

Grant Shapps Wikipedia Scandal!

Tory Chairman Grant Shapps accused of biased editing of rivals public Wikipedia records

ff SHAPPS WIKI copy

Conservative Party Chairman Grant Shapps, who also uses an alias as Michael Green to work in a second job, has been strongly accused of tampering with Wikipedia accounts of political rivals.

Fearing a loss at the General Election for his party, which have a track record over the last 5 years of scandal, deceit, corruption and cheating, Shapps/Green decided to change the accounts to display negative details of rivals.

An account was specifically linked back to Shapps, who has been using media over the same periods to bash oppositions with unbacked-up statements of smears, by Wikipedia and others.

Shapps who has been caught out, has publicly denied the reports, as usual. In another blow for the Tory party, publics continue to see it as liars, cheats and corruption at its finest for failing to be honest and hold hands up. But then, Shapps knows what he is doing is “morally wrong” and cannot defend the actions. Shapps adds someone may have acted on his behalf, including co-chairman of the Tories, on Shapps’ behalf. Therefore an admission that one of them has done so. As well as the fact that it was still under Shapps direction to do so. You really can’t make it up. The hole dug is getting very deep it would seem.

David Cameron. Always at the centre of public controversy and deceit.

David Cameron. Always at the centre of public controversy and deceit.

Leader of the Party and country, David Cameron, who loves to jump into a public statement on anything as it happens, has once again yet to comment on Shapps’ shady smearing. It is yet another scandal which seems to happen daily or weekly with almost every party member of the Tories today.

Mr Shapps, who has been involved in multiple scandals, the earliest over a rough six months, threatened legal action to someone who exposed his lies of working at a second job, whilst as party chair of the Conservatives. What a wimp.

The claims were dismisses, as journalists who did their job telling the truth, could not possibly face any bullying tactic to stand up in court, even if Shapps and his party lobby justice officials.

Earlier in 2012, the Daily Mail, among others, broke the story of a secret in-house affair of a senior Conservative official with another female party member. Both are married and highly praise adultery as sinful actions to Conservative values. There have been multiple scandals of cheating by scores of Tories, broken in the press, which none threatened with lacking legitimacy of legal action.

mail front page

The party covered up the release of the people having the affair but everyone in journalistic circles is aware the adulterer is Mr Grant Shapps. Mr Cameron knew of the affair and while “stunned” agreed to cover it up.

We can reveal this as it is not ‘officially named in the press’ meaning that it is ‘allegedly’ an ‘opinion’ (one of truth) and cannot be legally contested no matter how much spin is placed. Of course, as well, since we know, but cannot publicly confirm or deny, this is clearly labelled as comment or opinion.

That’s the Tories for you though. Hide behind the state totalitarian system they created for themselves to penalise the truth and hard-working, moral, decent citizens of the United Kingdom.

Tory Chair, Grant Shapps/Michael Green

Tory Chair, Grant Shapps/Michael Green

Cheating is in the blood, it would seem. Mr Shapps has Conned his way to the Wikipedia pages and the Tory Party. Instead of being a weasel hiding behind lies, perhaps he could gain some respect, what’s left of it, by being honest and stop lying about his deceit. Throwing around the justice system as a tactic to quieten truth is a reprehensible act that undermines the legal profession and the public’s lacking access to the courts aswell.

Over the past five years, leader David Cameron imposed Legal Aid restrictions, meaning the middle class sector of families and citizens would not have access to legal representation. Either they must represent themselves in court, or pay costs for barristers.

Experts and insiders claim this is a strict violation of legal reform that prevents access to the justice system for people of the nation, an imperative that was created solely for all to have access to.

Those who are poor and may qualify for Legal Aid are usually given cheap or rubbish lawyers and already stigmatised as not able to put a good case together. They are also quietly judged on appearance and background as lowest of society, where judges already set them up for a loss of the case as a result.

One question also remains on the side of Wikipedia. How does it manage to report accurate information on its database, without allowing tampering of pages with lies? It could and probably should hire real editors, given the information to update by Wikipedia frontman Jimmy Wales. Or it could offer a rate of payment per article, or in bundle to update and alter pages correctly.

jimmy wales

Currently Wikipedia, with low investment, allows anyone with an account to change/update pages. This has for years undermined the service as non-journalistic as a source of information. One question is certain. It cannot go on like that forever as a service, if it wants to be respected fully on it’s information gathering.

Political bodies, politicians or monetary services and donors in liaison with governments should not have access to such a platform for abuse.

IMAGES

The Spectator

Daily Mail

PeterReynolds/Wordpress

Skeptic Wars / Blogspot

Chris Grayling wants to make UK Totalitarian law bending Utopia over internet trolls

Grayling: Totalitarian Phantom laws for ‘trolls’ in Utopianist Britain raises systemic Governmental abuse

FF grayling trolls copy

Corrupt Justice Minister Chris Grayling has struck again at another attempt to abuse the laws of the United Kingdom to con their way into an election victory in May 2015.

Using the opportunity to try and gain votes from mothers and women over fears of online ‘trolls’ Grayling has instantly attempted to create any opportunity to trivialise law making by corrupt lobbyists of Westminster’s dark depraved halls. This is clearly an attempt to trap people into a jail sentence for those who are not these types of trolls and scaremonger and smear law abiding citizens with a strong opinion to trap them into a criminal punishment and stain their name. The ‘trolls’ they are attempting to ‘clean up’ Britain with are not trolls but over heightened abusive people online that lazy, out of touch politicians have scrambled upon a branding thereof. All due to different political beliefs, not with their ‘only us’ ways.

Yes, they need to be dealt with, but rushing and charging in all guns blazing with an empty law and no basis or thought will provide the corrupt UK Conservatives with another crippling blow in the future of the party. Already secretly changing laws in quiet and blaming the internet again and again in an attempt by idealistic Tories to ‘clean up’ Britain will once again damage and isolate the country and likely encourage more abuse than deter it.

Out of touch politicians never learn and think they can abuse the power from their personal choosing making the UK a new age totalitarian state.

Heavy Tory donor Lord Ashcroft, who shamefully funded David Cameron’s 2010 election campaign in secret, even told the Tories months ago to stop being complacent with their own selfish attitudes. Once again the Tories failed to listen to its most biggest and crucial donor let alone reform their attitude. Party politicians and donors have also defected to UKIP (United Kingdom Independence Party) instead, ruffling the Tory roost.

Politicians forget the public place them into office to represent the people of the country under a democratic process, not create an elitist club of out of touch, millionaire politicians trying to create an utopianist Britain based on shameful old age principals that fail to work in a modern age.

Not even one week old and Grayling jumped on a chance opportunity to attack online audiences and general members of the public over the Judy Finnigan rape row.

judy finnigan

Outspoken. Finnigan defended convicted rapist Ched Evans on talkshow.

Finnigan, a former daytime television host made blind sighted remarks about convicted rapist Ched Evans, who was debated as being allowed to play football again after his release from prison, appraisal. Her daughter Chloe defended her comments.  Both were soon given the ‘specialist troll’ treatment with high levels of abuse which we say is fully unacceptable for having an opinion. However, Grayling decided to use this as an excuse to make up a law which is entirely loose and ludicrous systemic abuse of the courts. He plans to amend the Crime Bill that currently exists, but fails to understand it does not exist, even if chaperoning legit law from the past. That clause is not legitimate and therefore irrelevant. Any defence can easily disregard it in the courts. Any judge agreeing based on personal attachment to it needs investigating into corruption of the court.

Finnigan and her daughter were told they would be raped by ‘trolls’ and Grayling decided to use her daughter Chloe to begin drafting a ‘Chloe’s Law’ to prevent trolls online. Chloe’s Law, which is entirely ridiculous, was a thought up, two minute lunacy with no depth or sustainable weight to law enforcement. Grayling went as far as to make outrageous comments that “cyber-mobs” are “poisoning” the UK and can face up to two years in prison instead of the already six month in place law. Clearly a level of personal hate in Grayling’s venomous tongue he adds they are “online terrorism” which is simply sickening for any minister to say. Trivialising such laws are a disgrace yet Grayling and pals fail to accept any attempt to stand back and think of situations or criticisms. It will not create a United Britain and continue to drive them further into going after people instead. Leading by example is fundamental with a level of rationality which is oblivious to the Tory enforcers.

Celebrity Chloe Madeley

Celebrity Chloe Madeley.

Finnigan’s daughter Chloe Madeley agreed the law needed updating to include Twitter and we agree. Thought it has to be in a controlled and rational drafting, not a personal hate which could also show that Grayling is ‘trolling the trolls’ with personal hate. Double standards do not lessen eh problem, only exemplify it.  Madeley added “I will always ignore the disgusting troll tweets I get because I honestly do not want to give them any attention. But the tweet in question took it to another level. There is a line where rationality ends and criminality begins. The person who threatened me crossed the line.”

When a ‘People’s Law’ is created it is often those who have died, been sexually abused to death, suicide or bullying in schools. Some include Aiden’s Law, Sara’s Law and others which are legitimate but often forgotten about by warbling ministers desperate to make up phantom justice on a whim.

Not only would Chloe’s Law be invisible and illegitimate, it holds no prosecutable standards which the ministers know but use their power to assume it will be made into a law. The internet is ungovernable, even if a law is enshirned by an establishment because you reside in a set country. That does not make it legitimate and therefore a defence is legal to challenge and disregard as such. Even enshrined into a law does not make it legitimate and further makes a laughing stock of the entire British Empire for such low thought and personal policy bias.

grayling

Grayling and his friends including fraudulent MP, who escaped prosecution Maria Miller, who stole from the state, continue to devise random laws to attack anyone they dislike based on strong views brought on by political wrong doing. They need to back up and think about their abuses. What they are doing is itself illegal and trying to justify it as ‘in power’ proves their systemic abuse. Trying to rush it to ‘get it in quick’ does not help anyone, as well as the fact that there are existing laws that already deal with most of their fantasy drafts.

miller con

Fraud forgotten. Close powered friends avoid prosecution.

miller sun

Excerpt from The Sun.

But they won’t listen. Therefore it is up to the courts to refuse them outright. Corrupt politicians believing they can do what they want and break the rules themselves is entirely disgraceful. In a democratic process and what used to be the greatest United Kingdom on fairness, principals and a liberal democracy, the politicians of the Tory party believe they can break it. Abuse of power when tampering with laws is outrageous and the public are not stupid as you would like them to believe. Should they fail to think long term about processes and stop attacking everything by a governing law, the courts should refuse all government interference.

The majority of laws have been systemically created by politicians who have bent the rules based on their personal opinions with a lobbying QC’s (Queen’s Council) and ministers. This is clear corruption. The government encourage it. David Cameron and his cronies who change the laws must remember, the electorate voted you in and these corrupt choices will continue to vote you out. You are not there by means of creating your own Totalitarian England. You are there to represent the needs of the UK and its residents that want their voices and rules heard, not any attempt to clamp down on people due to rich toffs in the Tory Party’s own distaste. Their attitude to multiple issues from their own assumptions is fundamentally destroying the UK with its citizens. Continuation on this will eventually create a civil war and rioting clashes if they are not careful and the government continue to disrupt the country to blame lower class citizens. In many cases it is to protect the business trading of mega rich companies who are friends of the politicians. Again, these corruptions are to support the needs of the few and not the many. All of which are good pals with the Tories, who need a job when they are voted out of politics for being bad.

The Tory party has been hit with numbers of scandals since 2010 including fraudulent expenses robberies from the taxpayer, in-party marriage affairs and infidelity on wives, the corrupt changing of laws to penalise poor people and online communities and taking away measly portions of helpful benefits to welfare claimants in desperate poverty.

trolls

To beat a troll you have to be a caveman?

If politicians were as noble as they should be from old age centuries required, they would start dealing with real laws on real criminals and abuses, than create fantasy ones on a ‘clean up’ Britain online. They never think or liaise with proper advisors of how a law is meant to be righteous and honest. Built on lies, people are bound to lie and cheat themselves aren’t they? Whose fault is that? The very ‘role models’ themselves dipping their grubbing fingers in the till getting away with it.

What ministers fail to understand are key concepts. Why the government, who shut people out of society, helps advance abuse from government abuses they get away with. Then there is the fact that clamping laws on people do not stop the abuse. The definition of troll is misunderstood by praying media and out of touch politicians. They should be liaising with people who have valid experience of over ten plus years of online communities (hint hint) as well as creating legitimate laws not tawdry ones that mean absolutely nothing. Abuse will continue to be widespread in offline as well as online communities and it has never been more important to teach kids and grown-ups too how to behave. Why have we lost the need for manners and self-control? Because the government has run around amok abusing the country for their own corrupt purposes which does not represent those who elected you into office. Such complacency is an outrageous disgrace that needs to be addressed and to treat this, politicians should lead the way. Instead they will be out for what they can get. Unless that changes, abuse will continue, because the government create such hardship and abuse. No-one chooses to wake up one day and willingly set out to abuse someone. There is always a reason or an instance, and the government do not want to figure out why it happens, they just want to wrongfully ‘lock you up and throw away the key’ for having an opinion. Some opinions ‘should’ be refined, but others are displaying how distressed people are with society. You can’t have it both ways. Everything is a compromise, but the Tories think they are the ruling Totalitarian elite and own everything they touch. That is the problem here. Even Midas came unstuck. They haven’t even been able to identify what a troll is. A troll is someone who winds you up for fun. The ‘super trolls’ who are calculated abusers and mimicking or hacking accounts are an undefined term which is what we are attempting to address here. If you are grown up and mature, then others will be. It really is that simple. There is no place in society with unfairness and that is a big problem in why cases like these occur. Wake up.

The laws that were changed to refuse legal aid to those who cannot afford representation against a baying state to penalise people based on taste is another fuller disgrace of corruption to a democratic country.

Years ago the Tories wanted to make the phrase and hashtag #ToryScum illegal because of people sharing opinions, non-malicious, about the politicians voted into PUBLIC office, failing the electorate in their hours of need, which means they are legitimately under scrutiny from those who elect them in the first place and they are public figures up for ridicule just as celebrities.

It is often staunch irony considering Tories break the laws and avoid sentencing furthering a lack of faith in the system of the British Empire let alone society. What has it come to when a farce from the Tories is that of trying to jail people for using ‘nasty words’ because of highly strung politicians who need to develop a thicker skin than running to the courts to create laws which are entirely set on abuse themselves?

One instance does not justify all, but the Tories use this as excuse to create such dissent. They are further creating hate and despicable standards as a result of law abuse. When things are unfair, no-one will recognise that as legitimate and therefore others are prone to breaking those rules from antagonisation of the shady and conniving hate fueled politicians. Personal penalisation has been rife and also landed the Tory plans for reform with welfare, forced labour and immigration benefit caps to become illegal. The Tories think they can surpass the law. No-one, including a politician, is above the law.

cam jolie

Cameron ‘dropped everything’ to chat and party with celeb in town Jolie over rape work.

Others see this as Grayling also protecting the needs of a rapist.

We are now content with locking up people with opinions that are worse terms than paedophiles, murders, rapists, fraudsters, burglaries and the like, which also goes against the law of freedom of expression, which Grayling plans to disrupt as a defence with his leaving of ECHR. That means you have no voice, say or defence against the Tories picking someone at random and choosing to jail them to serve as a Totalitarian message with its very own Gestapo at work. All because people who voted them in finally disagree with the politicians failing to represent the needs and add fairness to the country with its most vulnerable. The Tories own almost all media with its propaganda levels of Tory support in the press, especially. Freedom of expression is also a law and key fundamental principality of democratic process.

Grayling has also allowed colleges to ‘use excessive force’ to ‘disruptive’ inmates. In English, you can ruff them up and be okay from prosecution. Another level of systemic abuse. Inside suicides have increased in jail, quietly hushed up by Grayling and security services. Months prior a young man was ordered to be humiliated by an unnecessary strip search by police and meekly threw his underwear near the jumped up officer, waiting for any excuse to use a taser on the accused. He used it unnecessarily at the drop of a hat and had the gun pointed at the suspect the entire time when fully clothed.

Numbers average at more than six suicides a month. Britian’s crime rates, which the Tories lied publically as decreasing, face tough pressures with prison overcrowding.

Cameron, who made policies over rape very personal, sits with rape accused Tory speaker Nigel Evans.

Cameron, who made policies over rape very personal, sits with rape accused Tory speaker Nigel Evans, who reclaimed his job to current day.

Some tweets over Grayling’s attempt at vetting comments online, where ‘comment is free’ added –

  • #Grayling appears to have ambitions to jail everyone in Britain. He should start with himself.
  • Internet trolls face 2 years in jail under new laws. They might get a longer sentence without a lawyer #grayling
  • Prison overpopulation isn’t causing enough hardship, so #Grayling proposes we bung a few internet trolls in to make life really unpleasant
  • The scariest bit of the #Grayling proposal is the fact a politician doesn’t realise social media has a block or delete profile option.

 Source: Twitter.com

Yet there was no mention of the press being allowed to troll though. Why? The great Tory propaganda machine, perhaps? It never disagrees with the Conservatives, that’s for sure. Only The Guardian and the Daily Mirror are devoid of Tory influence. Tories never had many people disagree with them years ago because the thought they could shout them down with hardship and keep them poor. Now the electorate has risen up to be taken seriously and instead they try to supplant it down with abuse of laws. All because they don’t like the fact that people are telling them the truth of their failings and they obliviously think they are the be all and end all. A United Kingdom for them, not for others. Never the party of the people, all in it for themselves. Great Britain has always been ruled by a class system which never allows the UK ability to grow. If you are born poor, you will remain poor. The ‘aspiration nation’ is arife with false impositions. This is why the country will never grow and abuse from within will always continue, at the very precipice of the judicial system itself.

This is a law to combat cruelty – and marks our determination to take a stand against a baying cyber-mob. We must send out a clear message”.

– Chris Grayling. Justice Minister, UK.

IMAGES

Third Sector

Now Magazine

thetechjournal

James Kim

The Mirror

Debate: Is Oscar Pistorius Guilty?

The Trial of Oscar Pistorius.

A sexed up Reality TV drama?

Oscar Pistorius appears at pre trial hearing in Pretoria

After a heavy trial and public display, Oscar Pistorius’ trial has simmered down, for now, with the public eye. There is however one question everyone wishes to know. Is Oscar Pistorius guilty for the murder of girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp?

Whilst I am no professional in the field of court judge as many others, (which we also respect) we do see further into a situation than many others cannot see. Everyone wants to see the public details on offer to play public detective in this new guessing game, which also undermines the trial and the judicial system in part to the likening of celebritism. Pistorius is not guilty. Whether you like or hate him for his gun culture, attitude of carelessness and seen to be uncaring nature when articulating himself, the state have problems. They have a deceased body on their hands. That’s a fact. Pistorius killed her. That’s a fact. However, it is insanely immoral to prosecute someone, or anyone, for that matter simply because you need a fall guy. Throwing the book at him because the public are watching and the state of South Africa feels it needs to show the judicial system works by sending someone down is rather convoluted.

oscar reeva

Pistorius may have a tough past and horrible gun culture experience, but you cannot go after someone for a public display of fear-mongering, either. He can hope to educate himself better on his use of firearms, like others in society should.

Let’s look a little deeper. While his mind may not work like the rest of us logical thinkers, many faced with intrusion do not have time to be rational. Pistorius, a cripple with artificial legs hears a noise in the middle of the night that wakes him. He’s in bed with no legs. He thinks his girlfriend is next to him. He doesn’t have enough time to get up and shoo a suspected burglar at close proximity away. He has limited time to act, especially for a legless human with impaired movement. He has to get his legs on to move, including fixing them on. It is not rocket science and is a very easy case to attack for a prosecution.

Let’s be clear. We are not the law. We are not supporters of Pistorius. We are not supporters of Reeva either. We tell it how it is because the world cannot seem to understand how it works without a muddled confliction. Though public opinion and media reports often distorted should not be looked upon to make a agreeable decision. This is a serious case. Someone could go down for a murder. It is crucial to obtain the correct result than to get any one for a public on-look. It is very saddening that this happened, and should be a sign to anyone in similar thought positions of burglars to think differently before acting, even if it is limited. Though in certain situations a victim of robbery needs to be allowed self-defence.

oscar medals

The Hollywood glamour of a public trial is debatable for Open Justice as whether it advances or desabilises court proceedings. While Open Justice is fundamental to democracy and needed, is this case sexed up for media thrill more than its intentions over a hunky, Olympic Paralympian record breaker and his hot model girlfriend?

Our condolences are with the Steenkamp family, but trying to get someone to justify her death would actually be a sham. If anything, Pistorius could be found guilty of manslaughter or recklessness etc. As for murder, which we must get the ruling of very clear, it is strongly believed this did not occur. He shot her accidentally with a moment of confusion. A heightened experience awakening from a deep sleep to hear noises among you whilst with limited bodily capabilities multiples the distress in such a short time of realisation.

This itself would also be a perfect time for others to consider their relationships to firearms with a level of justification than a grab and shot persepctive, including the law upholders most recently with police forces. Unthoughtful reaction time and reliance on weaponry as a tool of availability is what can often cause multiple distress. Whilst it wont change tomorrow, putting the weapon away for a least a while will no doubt move forward a move constructive approach to humanity and establish a moral high ground which can be respected.

Should we continue on this path, it will be one step closer to defining a relationship of autonomous values with independent thought that changes postiion in society, which will does not sound appreciative, will give higher power as a state citizen. These decisions will be come respected by all and are likely to build together communities even further rather than separating them entirely. This allows publics to have a say, be respected and communicate in rational conversation which may be referred to as a defining change in national perceptions.

 

IMAGES

Vocfm

Telegraph

Standard