ITV Media playing at games of sex abuse victims

ITV Media playing at games of sex abuse victims

ff-itv-sex-abuse-scoring-copy

Does media involvement taint the severity and seriousness of situations for an over-sensualised story to rebuild their brand reputation? The answer is a categorical yes. The use of charity to boost their flagging brands while trying to seem sincere with a caring tone of ‘charity’ to add the false facade is paramount to continuing the levels of exploitation.

Such a serious issue is any form of paedophilia, which many continue to misunderstand, dismiss or rally troops in a full on hate mob with no sense or communication to tackling such an issue. Nothing will ever change by empty words or angry mobs taking over. This isn’t about the cheap excuse of “conversation” either as the vigilantes might try to complain of.

itvv

Their must be a level of controlled debate, action and support. That comes from society, past victims looking to move forward and authorative sectors looking to improve claims and lives of those affected, most namely, the police forces.

For years, Britain has lived on a hotbed of abuse, scandal, cover up and exploitation. When a case is opened the media jump on the bandwagon to desensitise the issue with tacky, biased and juvenile ‘reporting’ that clouds the issue, continues victims to fall silent and allow abusers free reign to survive justice.

Most recently, we have seen the obsessively immoral television station ITV, a channel broadcasting no programmes of interest and full of blatant bias of tepid proportions, making an attempt to use sex abuse victims to rebuild its dying brand. Adding a level of fake sympathy for company standing, ITV has continued to abuse the abused victims with a false fabrication of genuine care and complicity.

Using most of its TV show platforms with biased talking of issues has desensitised the issues which continue to cause victims to see the level of inaccuracy and failed communication between bosses in suits to real humans. Words and clever scripting to seem ‘on your side’ will be anything but. Victims live a life of reclusive introverts that TV and media shows turn an issue into a ragtime freebie of air time to look good and get investments. Add the label of charity is another exemplary tactic to deter, confuse and once more exploit. So it is legitimate to argue then, that places like ITV and media sources are the new age abusers of the abused.

itv-investors

ITV’s investors profits.

These loopholes can be opened to allow perpetrators to slip through the net via such distorted distraction and victims will be further victimised. No justice, depth of conversation and failed communication to understand their plight has many knock on effects. The legal hounding process in court, suicidal increase at distorted conversations missing the point and abusers smug in the knowledge of literally getting off with light punishments all by TV station wanting to ‘talk about it’ further alienate all it supposedly claims it tries to help.

Places like ITV are vigilant in their conceited efforts to convince themselves that they are doing something right when they are simply obnoxious bosses who believe because they have the power to put it out on the airwaves, they will. Anyone who disagrees can be shrugged off because ITV have no morals or ethical dimensions that show they can do what they want.

The levels of insensitivity, complacency and sheer attitude of what they want to talk about has and continues to shut out real stories, conversations and fuller details of disclosure. ITV want to ‘look good’ and get some company attention. Then the clever usage of caring people on their shows, like Loose Women, who on Thursday 02nd December, handled the conversation very well. This, however cannot excuse the policies and tactics of the backroom stooges who plan to see and abuse further with their soulless directions of unprofessionalism. Even the headlines are pathetically put together by some juvenile random who thinks they can be clever and smart with big words.

ITV have a negative and abusive attitude that if you don’t agree with them they take offence in a childish manner and go on a vindictively childish spell to do it anyway just to be silly. There is no coincidence that it has become the worst TV station in Britain by these childish actions and it’s so called output bosses completely clueless and doing things for ratings and attention only. Once again the most important to the case/s are forgotten. All for ITV’s ‘big I am’ mentality using innocent victims for demographics.

itv-genre-research-8-638

Demographic sourcing

Recently ITV have been using all demographics for sympathy with disingenuous tactics including gay culture, black and ethnic communities, Jews, Women and the like to continue its bureaucratic checklist of people than actually issues and cases. This has rendered ITV the most disgraced channel of recent time. All to make TV and increase advertising profit. Shameless PR stunts.

A day earlier we also tweeted about how the abuse scandal from footballers is now going to open a wider level of abuse including teachers, scouts, swimming clubs and coaches. We don’t say this for attention as we are in tune with people, but straight away ITV seized the chance to turn the drama into a charity using farce with its “Never too late to tell campaign” which continues to zap the momentum, conversation and victims’ intelligence to come forward as such a juvenile showcase of TV chatter for the sake of it has recoiled them into a darker place of obscurity. They cannot comprehend exposing to the public their stories when no one can handle it correctly or with any level of decency. Taste is not on ITV’s menu.

Upon reading this we will like receive more trolls complaining. But this is not about you and it isn’t about the shameless media using victims for stories and money making schemes. The last time we spoke out against ITV’s poor management style, we received a calculated level of abuse and nasty, vicious comments, clearly from someone who works at ITV, hiding behind a blank profile. Such is ITV’s caring and genuine nature that their first response is to abuse.

We do not argue and complain of juvenile bitching, we do our job and represent the right things out there. Of course as a result of this every institution copies what we say and do and then turns it into their own farce to try and be new and exclusive with stories while making a complete joke and unprofessional mess of it all.

The Sun newspaper has also been thoroughly guilty of misuse and self complacency doing ‘what they want’ ‘cos they can in a childish context which helps no one. Their latest farce of a charity is yet another example of the grave failings of Rupert Murdoch’s pitiful ‘journalists’ and PR men creating lunacy that distorts people’s willingness to speak out. Yet they try to complain that free speech is curtailed when they don’t get their own way after a slur of daily abuse on multiple targets. So called ‘Editor in Chief’ (Which is a title that does not exist in the UK) Tony Gallagher, a former kitchen porter, has been highly instrumental in tabloid gossip rag failings on his own blinded misdirection of what is. What is what? Exactly.

ITV and The Sun playing with the abused is not a novelty. Too many emotional choices and misdirected chatter for the sake of it helps no-one. None will come forward to such tacky and empty reporting where none of their cases will be taking seriously, and f any of them actually cared they would review their policies, but of course, they won’t, because they want the attention.

And that is why the hotbed of paedophilia in Britain is paramount and will continue to surge. The mentality of this behaviour will only further continue on to decades ahead of us, because some silly nitwit at one of these places jumps up with a pitiful ‘brainwave’ that offers a huge slap in the face to all victims and continues the UK’s disgusting levels of abuse, where no one gains closure, respect, dignity or justice.

Upon writing this, more of this conversation will be used, fancy words and detail copied, and further alienation of those it is most necessary to hear and protect. All for air time and column inches.

itv-bubbles

ITV Bubbles

We don’t write for you, we write for the victims who will hopefully speak out at their own pace to help others suffering or potentially at risk of further instances that can b the start of reforming this age old level of abuse.

All abuse starts in the home, and the government, who want to shamelessly believe everyone lives a ‘happy home’ life with parents etc who have neglected any support of people well aged into their 30’s and beyond prove the greatest disgrace to the greatest levels of abuse, courtesy, in large parts, of the UK.

It is time to move forward not behind. But the government are busy burying their own paedophilia scandal in efforts to not make ‘the establishment’ look bad. Always the same, look after yourself, never anyone else.

Will anything ever change this way?

Those that are blamed or abused are the ones who often speak the truth.

IMAGES

News UK

IB Times

ITV

SlideShare

Advertisements

Who should get a UK honour after Rio Olympics 2016? (If at all)

Who should get a UK honour after Rio Olympics 2016? (If at all)

FF 21 AUG 16 rio knights copy.jpg

After one of Britain’s most successful Olympics to date (with some questionable entries) many are naturally losing their clarity over whether some of them should be given honours from the British Empire.

laura jason

On the double. Trott and Kenny grab golds.

After rows following David Cameron’s exit from number 10 Downing Street with a number of honours reflecting cronyism rewarding his useless pals and his wife’s stylist (seriously) more lunatics have jumped in.

cam

The man who truly hatred Britain. Totalitarian Cameron, The world’s worst ‘leader’ ever.

No more so than the desperation of The Sun newspaper, edited by Tony Gallagher, a no-life virgin with big ears from national propaganda channel The Telegraph when sacked. His band of brothers at the red top tabloid gutter press, full of sleaze, non stories and personal opinion has been highly questionable on the basis of journalism. It isn’t and we all know it. Seems they themselves, do not.

Another numpty Steve Hawkes, a hatchet job writer with no fact and all personal cheerleading “demands” along with The Sun that some of our Rio 2016 Olympians get honours from new Prime Minister Theresa May. Hilarious.

These ‘Olympians’ have no honour and are average Joe’s who have been handpicked to the ‘prawn cocktail brigade’ of elite clubs because the won a medal in a chance opportunity.
Being an Olympian is meant to be about being a sportsman, overall. The moment national propaganda rears its ugly head to distort the entire political, journalistic and social juncture is a constant recipe for disaster.

Why Theresa May, who is already struggling to make her mark as the unelected bureaucrat who lost faith for failing to veto Cameron’s crony honours disgrace, would sully her reputation over some “demand” from a gutter press hack is amazing.

Mrs. May must not be the caving rock that crumbles to fandom convention. Since when was she The Sun’s b*tch, anyway? A leader does not follow.

obe

Trinket. What an OBE looks like.

On the ‘newspaper’s side of things, The Sun has always been questionable journalism since its new stance of the last four years with untalented caretaker journalists thinking they are good enough. Proprietor Rupert Murdoch is dumb enough to think it can work. Murdoch has lost his edge on figuring out how to sell papers and have a level of media respect, all lost by recent headlines full of sleaze, vulgarity and opinionated drivel.

If any, there are only a handful who deserve honours and not so great, either. Everyone loses their mind when the Olympics comes along and a moment of cheerleading jamboree for Olympic winners will further discredit the honours system as well as Britain as a nation. These people really have done nothing except participate in games as sportsmen.

The lunacy does not reward the people it intended to and is therefore a broken system.

The only way to retain credibility is to really value and accept those who do make extraordinary feats. The days of climbing Mount Everest, Sailing around the world or achieving something monumental in societal communities often forgotten has created more ‘enemies’ of the British Establishment than it has ‘honoured’ and is there hogwash.
These equivalents of benefit handouts with a broken elite will further alienate the public from the establishment and divide the honours lineage filled with crony’s.

daley.0

Pants, calendars and media attention = failure.

Even failed diver Tom Daley is being put up by the press for an OBE. The token gay man in skimpy pants who finished in last place failing to qualify in the men’s 10m diving board proves that rewarding failure with high accolades continues the prawn cocktail brigade of elite club nobodies undeserving of recognition.

Not to mention the honour will also add more intensified, unnecessary pressure on the athletes in sport and generally to live up to such roles as young and developing ‘role models’ for others.

t may

The end result is clear. Should Theresa May lose her mind and cave in it will undermine her, her next four years as unelected follower, the British Establishment, the honours system and society at large. Theresa May claims she will reward all those deserving of honours but has failed to honour the most obvious of people doing good for the country. So every time an Olympian wins something, they are going to get some random trinket from Britain which proves they have never done anything to earn it, not to mention being funded by the National Lottery players in secret as a secret con job?

mo
Most are more obsessed with being media personalities and seeking famedom with the outdated press. This is no honour. Not to mention national treason from the press for abandoning their position and infiltrating the honours system breaking journalistic and moral code. They are not allowed to be instigating or influencing these establishment and political decisions. Back in the day they would be locked up in the Tower. They should be reprimanded by Mrs May. she has much to do, and falling silent on such issues will only hammer her reputation further. She has a chance to prove she can sort out Britain’s mess and is currently flagging in the wind.

If any, the only people (Olympians) deserving of Knightoods are as follows :-.

Laura Trott (MBE)
Jason Kenny (MBE)
Jade Jones (MBE)
Mo Farah (CBE)
Jessica Ennis-Hill (CBE)
Adam Peaty (MBE)
Jonny Brownlee (OBE)
Adam Brownlee (OBE)
Bradley Wiggins (Sir)
Nicola Adams (MBE)

Christine Ohuruogu (CBE)

IMAGES

Sportsmole

Worchester Regiment

Daily Mirror

Out Sports

 

REVEALED: David Cameron led Press Regulation inquiry to avoid hiring criminal Phone Hacker as top advisor

REVEALED: David Cameron led Press Regulation inquiry

to avoid hiring criminal Phone Hacker as top advisor

ff 26 sep 15 cam diversion coulson press copy

In more sensational revelations into the corruption of David Cameron, the Daily Mail’s serialisation of Tory peer Lord Ashcroft’s unofficial autobiography of the immoral leader exposes his true intentions of tampering with press freedoms.

Mr Cameron launched the Leveson inquiry to probe Press Regulation and the freedoms to be regulated by the state, through Cameron’s manipulative endorsements. The leader of the UK added he used it as a diversionary tactic to avoid his hiring of Andy Coulson, a disgraced editor soon to be charged over his Phone Hacking abuses.

cam-brooks

Cameron used it as a smoke screen as he felt he would lose his political candor from other parties, prepared to hold him to account. Cameron was also highly involved on a personal level with serial gameplayer, Rebekah Brooks. Brooks, a close friend of Cameron and leading editor or Rupert Murdoch’s British Press tried to “spread the NoTW virus into whole of the rest of the country” one anonymous source reveals. The News of the World (NoTW) was shut down after hacking phones of public people, murdered schoolgirls and celebrities for cheap stories to sell papers. Brooks also had a rampant affair with Coulson, as the pair hacked together and were both on trial, which Brooks closely evaded as ‘innocent’ assumed by many of her powerful connections. Brooks added that the Cameron household was like a “family” to her, further ruining her political and journalistic clarity. Brooks returned last month as the leader of Murdoch’s press wagon News UK, heavily editing The Sun newspaper once again with an ex-Telegraph unknown.

With the facts distorted and played with by Brooks and co, Cameron felt this would take the heat off of his hiring of convicted criminal, now released after a paltry sentence, with his immoral disgrace.

ru reb

Press Regulation ideas were rebuffed by the freedom of the Press and virtually no papers signed up to the new proposals, which have quietly been dropped under Cameron’s poor deterrent. Cameron attempted to blame the Labour and Liberal Democrat party for calling on Press prevention schemes.

Instead Brooks convinced the state to set up IPSO, which is a governing body of The Sun, who have been abusing its rights to hide behind posting negative stories and avoid any level of accountability for its wrong doings in defaming honest people and making non-stories for profit. Mr. Murdoch could not fathom, like Mr Cameron why it was ‘such a big deal’.

Since the Murdoch has gone from respected media baron to a more senile, bitter abuser of political and democratic values for commercial gain, not in accordance with governing rules. Murdoch’s sales have rapidly decreased continuously, to the leading country paper, the Daily Mail. It is said to be backwards in coming forward with modern journalism and journalist acquisitions. Many regard the paper today as commercial garbage, with no actual fact, news worthy stories and filled with nasty, attacking opinion only.

David Cameron and Rupert Murdoch, 2009

David Cameron, feeling he was on the brink, installed Mr Oliver Letwin to lead the proceeding proposals of avoiding regulation. Letwin said to a room full of editors “I don’t know why I’m doing this. I hate journalists. I hate all journalists.”  That led to the birth of IPSO, secretly coded by a political message from Rebekah Brooks on how to proceed. IPSO can offer up to £1million of fines to any paper aligned with it for inaccurate or immoral deeds not regulated by the state., in hopes to continue a responsible and free press. When the pair communicated through emails, Brooks signed off ‘LOL’, a well known acronym of – Laugh Out Loud. David Cameron’s absurd assumption was that it meant – Lots of Love. Why someone would think of a loving context between the two, under press and political standards was plain absurd.

coulson

Many campaigners including Hacked Off believe the Press abuses since the last couple of years have worsened under Murdoch’s style of reporting opinion over fact and claim this is enough for further, accurate regulation. Mr Murdoch has juggled numerous people in his strategic reforming of journalistic jobs in his empire, mainly The Sun newspaper. Many feel it is not in touch with modern editorial or public opinion standards and has the wrong people in the wrong positions. That will be Mr Murdoch’s biggest challenge if ever to retain his kingpin credibility with real journalism and its credible standards.

IMAGES

Daily Mail

Daily Telegraph

The Guardian

The Sun’s Bizarre end

Today is the day we mourn the death of The Sun newspaper’s Bizarre column. In a truly bizarre move, the newspaper has rehired a new batch of showbiz wannabes. Two randoms who happen to be girls and smile awkwardly for a PR photo of profile raising with a terrible layout to mimic the new ‘head of showbiz’ glory hunter and cretinous hack Dan Wooton.

Image

After taking concepts and thought processes from this site, the founder, Rupert Murdoch has chosen to reward two unknown as well as his previous tragedy of Column Idol, where the contest, done in house and not advertised where the paper selects its own bias winner, has hit a brick wall. With no style, skill and to ‘get more women’ in the paper, male dominated, Bizarre proves to be a daft move in which Murdoch, who loves to steal details from this site and fail to reward, of which this writer would have made a glorious reputation for your failing tabloid, has given a greenlight to.

Image

A supporting cast also prop up the team with three other randoms. Previous head Gordon Smart was shifted to the Scottish Sun as Editor. Dan Wooton side-lined him as ‘head of showbiz.’ Many believe this decision is clearly also copying the infamous 3am girls. The two girls, who will be prone to copy and pasting to create their stories, have added little impact to the job. Their first spread featured a PR prone Cheryl Cole giving a thumbs up. One Direction wrote on pieces of paper to ensure good press with the girls. The girls shared a photo of themselves with bizarre favourite Rita Ora. Anything for a photo op and self-portrayal, aye? Ground-breaking journalism at its finest. Leader of the Conservative (Tory) Party, David Cameron controls all the newspapers in Britain except for two. Those in charge of are The Sun and Sun on Sunday, The Daily Star and Star on Sunday, Daily Express and Sunday Express, The Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday, The Times and Sunday Times, The Independent, Independent on Sunday and the i and the Daily Telegraph and Sunday Telegraph as well as the Financial Times.

Papers not included are The Mirror and Sunday Mirror and The Guardian and The Observer.

Image

Image

The paper is said to be constantly “backwards” and “full of trash” to readers commenting anonymously. Journalism is truly dying a painful death. But it’s okay. Once the fourth estate journalism crumbles without my involvement in print, yet stolen stories all over the press in every paper, the fifth estate journalism will evolve, and I will be in the centre of it all. Only question is, how much shutting out abuse will cause you to be against us than with us? It’s up to you to continue to make the wrong decisions, or be a businessman. Good luck national Press. 

Media Week 3

Media Week 3: The Sun,

The Guardian

the sun logo guardian header

Week 3 stems from the above two papers.

PAPPA THE RAPPER!

justin bieber attack papz

This weeks story in the tabloids could not be avoided. The curious case of Justin Bieber. A sensitive issue with fans if ever there was one. On Monday the teen heartthrob failed to show up for a concert at the O2 Arena leaving paying fans in utter distress. Even young children were in tears as others were dumbstruck for two hours. Various radio and news reports claimed Biebs was having some friend chicken at a restaurant. One father expressed on BBC News “We were fans of Justin Bieber. We loved him, now we hate him!” While passing fickle fans another added elsewhere they were OK with waiting two hours for him and tolerated the delay in favour of their baby. Later on in the week, Bieber collapsed and was rushed to a London hospital, where he allegedly in The Sun, screamed at minders and his music team who got the wrong equipment with his grown up toys. On Friday, the Canadian megastar launched himself at a photographer who took a photo outside his car. Bieber jumped out of the car he just clambered into screaming “I’ll beat the f*** out of you!” One photographer told the pop star to “f*** off back to America” where Canadian Bieber flipped. Perhaps misunderstood or intentional, this sent Justin over the edge, restrained by security. Another pap reminded such action could be classed as assault. Justin apologised after on Twitter to his fans and even sent a racy snap from his hospital bed, smiling, glaring into the camera topless and showing off the hemline of his pants.

jb bed

Back in the day when a papparazzo is almost floored they used to understand it was a sign to back off and they did so. Nowadays pap’s need to “get that shot” which puts the money on the table and they have no reservations in how to ethically achieve it, instead being aggressive or invasive as a result. Pap’s need to learn to behave themselves instead of taunting others also. As for Bieber there is no excuse for the attack, possibly provoked. The 19 year old may have mis-understood the phrase and assumed his Canadian heritage was being mocked, however was being asked to go back to America of which he has cracked superstardom of. Never call American’s Canadians and vice versa, just like with Australian’s and New Zealand natives. They become extremely aggressive. One question is that of the music industry and suggest they should support the star. Some have argued that Bieber’s mini meltdown is the start of problems to continue. Others claim the “diva’s” partying caught up with him and took effect. Whatever the case, both sides have to learn to remove themselves from causing literal tension with provocation. Reporting on it is fine, but encouraging behaviour on both parts is extremely unprofessional and plain pathetic.

parappa

CLEGG CLOWN

Thursday’s The Sun had a snippet where “One Justin who will not let kids down” in the form of Mr.Tumble. Don’t be confused as this was not Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg in disguise.

mr tumble   nick clegg show polish

HEALTH BOSS POCKETS BONUS DEFENCE FROM TORY LEADER

Cunning Conservative leader David Cameron has blamed opposition party Labour and Heath Secretary Andy Burnham for Sir David Nicholson, the man behind the NHS receiving tons of bonuses for the massive numbers of hospital deaths which occurred under Nicholson’s management. Labour stated Sir David should be “sacked immediately.” David Cameron once again senselessly attacked Labour for the blunder and again protected rich fat cat Nicholson, who claims to have done nothing wrong and takes no responsibility. Labour responded of Cameron trying to “politicise a huge tragedy” for personal gain. All David Cameron can ever do is blame Labour for every mistake the Conservatives are causing in their almost three of five year term in government of which they pledged to rectify problems, which has since seen Cameron obliterate the poor on benefits cutting their minimal money, threatening to remove them from welfare for up to three years and plan a tax decrease for the wealthy, including millionaires and bankers who gain ludicrous 100% bonuses for the coming budget statement due in a couple of weeks.

nhs david nich

LEADER OF UK BECOMES SPORADIC JOURNALIST

Dave also wrote an article in the Sunday Telegraph last week and has mentioned Prince William’s 21st birthday security failings. The man who had a background in media before being elected to lead the Conservatives, also agreed with William Hague, Foreign Secretary, that Britain will be deploying minimal levels of armour and vehicles to Syrian rebels after China and Russia deployed military defences to the President’s side. Hague, who didn’t think twice about sending support along with the already cut defence budget in Britain, and as Cameron announced over the Mali intervention in terror wars “for decades to come” of which Cameron sparked for Britain with idealistic, thoughtless deployment, as a moral obligation.

David Cameron enjoying a pint during a Test match in August 2011

ARMOR AID FOR SYRIA

While a moral obligation is there to help “more than 70,000 have been killed since the uprising of President Bashar al-Assad began in 2011” and as the only country that really supports almost every country in need of aid in some form in Europe, Great Britain cannot keep intervening into other people’s ‘wars’. If so, then the rest of Europe need to band together, but won’t because the world has become segregated into fear to ‘stick to their own’. Remember when the UN and all that war thing happened and nations would bail out one another if some country was under attack? Come on Dave, you remember your privileged Ox-bridge education on history lessons now, don’t you?

TOTAL ECLIPSE OF EU HEART

Bonnie Tyler has been announced as the entry for the 2013 Eurovision entry for the United Kingdom. With David Cameron’s personal idealisation on the EU, will we manage to beat nil points? Perhaps Europe will be gracious to give us enough points to make a point? Maybe we will get the number exact for how many European members Cameron got a no from? Now that, on Europe’s part, would be cleverer than nil points or near the bottom of leader boards. 61 year old Bonnie added “I’m very successful all over Europe. I think that will stand me in good stead.” The final of the contest takes place at Malmo, Sweden in May. Alternatively, you could start giving some points to make it seem less rigged.

bonnie tyler

BENEFITS BLITZ FOR MIGRANTS OR BRITONS?

Back to benefits in more detail. Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan-Smith claimed the handouts were facing a “crisis” as migrants are flocking to Britain to claim handouts specifically. Is this the excuse for cutting the benefits system from the poor or just an excuse to cut everything for everyone? Regardless of the answer, the poorest in Britain are suffering yet the rich are not paying or contributing anything to society. When the poorest who have no money cannot pay for anything how do you expect to keep things in the country moving? You have to take a sum from the rich, who it won’t affect fully and are contributing to the country to stabilise its future economy. David Cameron earns a whopping £142,500 a year, plus bonuses. (Source: Wikipedia)

Interestingly this information over the last week has miraculously been edited out from Wikipedia.

“The UK Prime Minister receives £142,500 per annum as salary for being Prime Minster. He is also a sitting MP and thus receives and additional salary of £65,737.” (Source:Answers.co.uk)

This is a man who is cutting Human Rights and seeking laws to legally track all your browsing history and details online to snoop your emails and information to collect from internet providers. Legal hacking, anyone?

Cameron also promised Indian’s on a tour of the country a fortnight ago they could come and live in the UK if they graduate and earn a job over £20,000. The UK has scores of unemployment increasing, including students now paying a hefty triple fees price tag set by David Cameron himself, with input from Business Secretary Vince Cable of the Liberal Democrats. Cam also went to poor nation Africa and pledged to send them aid rather than focus on his own struggling citizens he is supposed to be representing living in poor conditions for the UK even though not as poor as Africa, granted, the country at home is your main priority. No?

iain duncan smith claw

 

 

 

Guardian shielding elitism?

I also bought Friday’s edition of The Guardian, in store, however, could not find one story of interest, nor one that wasn’t completely full of blocks of text that should be readable and has a high level of “broadsheet” expectancy. As mentioned last week I can handle a broadsheet in contrast to a tabloid, but these are just many problems papers are facing, the Berliner size format allowing for more text and a strongly higher than’high-brow’ editorial is becoming problematic and needs either modifying by editors or inclusion of ‘lower brow’ writers the paper would probably class me into.

Three months ago in a passing comment a journalist who works for the Daily Mail mentioned in a mocking manner “Another debate piece in The Guardian? “How to take these comments will be your choice as with mine above, however, its needs addressing and mine are clearly advice, should you wish to get a heads up. If you want a piece on something as well, I’m available. Thanks.

 

IMAGES

The Sun

Playstationlifestyle

whoopidooins

News Biscuit

The Mirror

The Guardian

NME

archbishop-cranmer /Daily Mail

Dear Deandre Week 1

Dear Deandre

The Sun newspaper recently offered the general public the opportunity to have a go at being an agony aunt/uncle for their paper and their readers’ troubles. This is something we had planned on doing months ago for this very site, though have been side-tracked. So in this aptly named piece, Dear Deandre, one shall use common sense, ethical approach and support in how to solve your dilemmas in a realistic way. These views are in no way affiliated with Deidre Saunders, her team or The Sun employers. Yet. They can offer me the role should they wish at a later date.

If I wear knickers am I gay?

Image

“I’ve worn women’s knickers since I was young. I am a married man of 33. My wife had no idea until I asked if I could wear one of her thongs. I also want to shave my body. Does all this mean I’m gay?”

Most men wear female undergarments for comfort and the feel. It doesn’t make you gay and a vast majority wear them. Being bi-sexual or bi-curious may also be a feeling for some gents. This is nothing to be ashamed of, though in this case you’re wearing them because they feel good and this isn’t a homosexualised concept highly based on myth. A number of gay men don’t wear knickers; therefore the connotation is simply redundant. Shaving body hair for a smooth look or feel is common and isn’t any less manly. Incorporate fun times with your wife and she may be interested and find it pleasing too. If not then don’t continue with her but remain wearing if it is comfortable for you.  If you feel it is becoming an addiction of sort, slowly wean yourself off by wearing them minimally.

Fri

Gay lust for Sis-in law

“I love my husband but fancy his sister. I’m 33 and my husband’s 35. We’ve been married for six years and have two children. Something’s missing in our sex life.”

It is common to develop lustful feelings for someone due to proximity and lack of passion. Being close either emotionally or where others seem to take an interest draws us to a deeper connection. These feelings will pass, but only when you turn your attentions away elsewhere. This is a crush and you don’t really want her but your emotions based on someone seeming to care with no other interest current in your life is sending you one way. Do nothing, don’t act nor respond to them publically with discussion of your feelings, keep your distance so feelings hopefully pass and choose not to think of them daily. Pre-occupy yourself with other things and look towards repairing your marriage. Find ways to make sex interesting for you. If not, look elsewhere outside of your family. Also can the flirty texts. This is not helpful and perhaps she enjoys your attentions only.

Thurs

Girlfriend caught me at it in alley outside club

Image

“I’m 27 and my girlfriend is 25. We were together for two years. We have been rowing for a while but loved each other too much to end it.”

While your relationship is clearly problematic, you have done yourself no favours in striking out to someone who gave you attention which has cost you your relationship. Even should you remain together, you have broken your communication at the final point of no return, pardon the pun. Your betrayal has driven her to finally end it as you have hurt her tenfold. You should have ended it beforehand. Many couples remain in sour relationships and neither is content, meaning its time to move on. This one cannot be repaired because you had sex as the “final nail in the coffin for her.” Your admission of other unfaithful affairs proves you need to donate time, faith and care to a relationship. Sex is all well and good, but when in a relationship you have committed yourself to another. If you want to be a player, do not enter partnerships. If you want one, you cannot pick and choose when to dabble. Build a stable relationship, spend time with one another and communicate. Cut down on alcohol consumption too, as you are using this as a release from your straining partner.

Thurs

Girlfriend’s auntie is expecting my baby

Image

“I’m 21 and work in a restaurant as a chef. My girlfriend’s aunt is 37 and our front-of-house manager . She looks great for her age. All of the guys fancy her. We both agreed we were just sex buddies.”

Because everyone else fancies her you should have sex? Would you jump off a cliff if someone asked you to? I should have gone with head in the oven, actually. You had sex with her because it was available and as you write “technically we did nothing wrong” because you haven’t met someone your age. After you met her niece at a birthday bash, you found someone your attracted to of your own type and age. You have been going out for three months. You need to tell your girlfriend as soon as possible. It is up to her if she chooses to stay with you. Having her aunt’s child is going to literally come out. Whatever this outcome, you will need to support the child and stop having sex with her aunt. You are also affecting your working relationship. Sex buddies like this don’t work out as they are too closely entangled in being anything other than. You haven’t cheated on your partner, but she will feel cheated in the form of lying the longer you take to break the news. Also, use a condom and maintain safe sex.

Sat

Face-block?

“My girlfriend is threatening to dump me unless I delete two former girlfriends from Facebook. I’m 29 and she’s 26. She’s being ridiculous, she says I should have no contact with them but why should I delete them?”

Image

Having an ex around is damaging for any relationship, especially with a new partner. Shock factor stories of Facebook ex’s having hook ups with their former’s has added a sense of insecurity. She is bothered that you remain connections with your previous girls because you clearly saw and had something with them, not only one but you have two. She will assume you don’t like her enough and may not compete. You need to establish with her why you keep them honestly and decide whether to delete or not and if she can’t get on board and you don’t provide good reasons to make her understand in a non-threatening context you must decide your path. You must ask yourself the question too, why do you keep them as friends?  Ask yourself, if they asked you for sex, would you do it, if you haven’t a girlfriend, and why would you do it or not? Personally I would delete them, but you don’t want to. You could find this an issue with every girlfriend you have in future. Do you really need these ex conquests or is your current girlfriend a trophy to show off socially that you have moved on, when you may still be living in a past lifestyle? Alternatively, let’s turn the question around. How would you feel if she had two ex-hunks on hers?

Sat

Problems from period of 26th Feb – 2nd Mar 2013.

Have a problem? Want impartial, helpful, professional advice? Leave a comment below or send a tweet on Twitter. Alternatively send an email or Facebook FalseFabs, which will be launched next week. Thank You for your time and we aim to help support your everyday problems.

IMAGES

ChesterChronicle.co.uk

Maziar Hooshmand, Mused.com

StaffNurse.co.uk

thehindu.com

Media Week 2: Newspapers

Media Week : Newspapers. The Sun, The i, The Independant

Papers 2

Austerity Amid Allocation

Britain has lost its AAA Credit rating at the hands of Chancellor George Osbourne. Mr. Osbourne who pledged in his election manifesto of 2010 that maintaining the AAA credit writing was practically ‘in black and white’ which now sees him labelled as “downgraded.”The i write Osbourne is “in complete denial” in regards to the economy in Britain. Osbourne’s defence was “This is a stark reminder of the debt problems built up in Britain over the last decade and a warning that we can’t run away from dealing with those problems.” At the end of the year for 2012, Britain’s estimated figures of lowering the deficit weren’t reached and increase by roughly £20 billion extra. Britain’s deficit, which has seen the rich unharmed, the poor penalised and losing benefits after Oxford/Cambridge privileged politician’s education yields them from reality, assuming all benefit claimants are “skivers” and borrowing more money, yet cutting army defence budgets as well and only focused with a personal battle over the EU in Europe, the Conservatives believe they have not harmed society nor the economy of Britain after a near three year stint claiming to remedy the mistakes Labour made they accuse them of. When George isn’t content with snorting lines of coke and ordering prostitutes from his 1980’s leisure lifestyle, today George has changed his story as The i end on quoting shadow chancellor Ed Balls stating “He used to say a downgrade would be a disaster, today he says this downgrade doesn’t matter but he is still warning a further downgrade really would be a disaster. Looks more like Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

george osbourne

Photograph’s emerged of the identity of one of the two murderers of then child James Bulger. The tragic murder of Bulger was so extreme that both young offenders were placed into witness protection, which changes your complete identity, name and area code in society. While many are angered that this is in place for such evil people, and some in society wish to know whether the grown up murders are next door, down the road or even your boyfriend to avoid being conned into such relations, has seen pictures released online through social media outlet Twitter. While many wish to know, you cannot break the law and post photos from the Criminal Justice System as a bit of social Twit-ettiqutte. Those who revealed AND re-tweeted the pics all face legal charges and investigation. “The pictures were also circulated on Facebook. Any found guilty could faces fines or prison sentences.” The i adds

The i, Tuesday

To the Manor porn

jason manford

Comedian Jason Manford who first made headlines two years back with sex texts was revealed to have “paid £60 for web sex” according to The Sun. Containing the anonymity of the source of the kiss and tell, who was a 22 year old STRIPPER, whose job on a seedy website was to get naked for punters. “The Sun has withheld images she saved of the 40 minute romp.” Manford asked her “Are you gonna keep this a secret?”

Firstly this is not a super exclusive and just a storm in a teacup. Playing on the wife card, which is not right in any way to commit forms of adultery, the questions raised is not that of Manford, but indeed the “seedy” female young stripper attempting to cash in on someone’s misfortune based on the fact she took snaps, logged down info and planned the whole time to gather intelligence to expose Manford in one of the cheapest tabloids in Britain, which undermines its credibility to the profession, actually. This is a common practice today however, after it has been revealed that numerous student females, and some men, are forced into online ‘prostitution’ to work as cam girls on sites after David Cameron has turned them all into by increasing student fees as well as the evil cull of welfare benefits to the most needed.

Celeb spotting on cam sites is more common than you would think. I have seen numerous stars online, though they don’t know. There you go Britain. A man will keep a secret, a sleazy female, young and desperate for cash, will sell her soul and ruin someone’s life to advance her own. This is what is highly alarming for society overall. Also, it was not a “romp” as they had no actual intercourse. It is important for journalists to get their terminology correct instead of going for major headlines which expose your tawdry attempt at journalism. Stephen Moyes wrote the shabby article.

The sadness of David Cameron’s big society increased. After explaining that the strain of living in the UK would be severely catastrophic in our previous article – benefits…. We warned of impending, growing numbers of suicides. Numbers have risen including teens and a 14 year old boy previously, though one couple committed suicide from the same tree. At 24 and 31, a tragic waste of young life occurred. The female ended their seven year relationship, to which the man, 31, ended his life prompting his ex-girlfriend to use the same tree a fortnight later.

The Sun, Weds

By By Bye!

eastleigh lib dems

Results of the Eastleigh by-election were an extremely useful gauging on politics for the future unbeknownst to the general public uninterested. You don’t need to be interested to understand, though that connotation is what drives people from the ‘politics private gentleman’s club’ vision. The Liberal Democrats held on to the region, with a close uprising from UKIP. They were separated by only 2,000 votes, roughly. Conservative MP and media shy candidate Maria Hutchings failed hammered into third place. Labour plodded along in fourth with a comedian as their candidate.

Lib Dems scrapped through, though maintained their dignity. Though UKIP’s increase was obvious to the general public but still a shock to Westminster who can’t fathom why they gained popularity. David Cameron labelled the UKIP (United Kingdom Independence Party) a “protest vote.” Firstly, suggesting it is a protest vote, then surely that demands you have failed you priorities at running the country to which you claim to serve the public and its society first and foremost instead of personal endeavours? Secondly, UKIP were not a protest vote. The fact that Westminster hasn’t and still ignores issues on immigration are proving deadly. Immigration is a massive issue for the country, it has been for year’s yet the country have felt they were unable to mention it in our mutli-cultural society in fear of being branded racist, abusive or indeed getting into trouble for slight mention of point due to highly politically correct mis-understanding which also highlights migrants unable to integrate into society. Feeling shut out as a minority, this is exactly why UKIP have and will again rise with the public. The UK is a democratic society which supports all faiths, gender, sexuality and religions and in hindsight, they themselves feel treated like dogs and abused by migrants who laugh in the face to sponge of the system and penalise everyone else in Britain for it. This is the feeling across Britain and is a troublesome view left un-dealt with. This is why UKIP will rise in the polls.

The UKIP candidate was a former conservative who defected. Many Conservative politicians have joined UKIP, while some UKIP’s have switched to Conservative.

Facebook of bother

A father tried to ban his thirteen year old daughter from Facebook. Facebook declined the request. “His legal bid came after she used Facebook to post sexually suggestive pictures and had sexualised contact with other men.” “Facebook said it was powerless to stop the girl using an account because she could simply create new ones under different pseudonyms and access the site from a multitude of different devices.”

Should Alarm bells not be ringing? One. Why is a 13 year old allowed to use Facebook on Facebook’s part? Two. Why is this child becoming highly sexually active online and engaged in conversations. Are we to now blame the men she chats to excuse her age?

Parenting is vital to this case. Only when it goes wrong do we intervene. You should be making sure it doesn’t get to that stage. As for Facebook, it understands its own flaws and still does nothing. The world is using Facebook in such ‘bad’ contexts that it needs to regulate but continues to fail to do so and lets everyone run riot on there posting abuse, pornographic content and cyber bullying and yet tracks your personal information to sell on to advertising companies to track you to sell you something instead. The US government need to intervene if Facebook, which it can’t, regulate its content. It has had numerous chances and founder/thief Mark Zuckerberg is only interested in abusing privacy to gain money and ruin people’s lives, yet maintains his own private details. Handy. The site is changing its strategy to a more business one instead of a social one it intended to be. Answer? Finish using it, it does nothing for you and keep minimal usage, but still talk to friends as a result only. Your best interests are not at heart.

Source: The i, Saturday

Frosty Knickers!

Saturday’s The Independent had virtually the same story from the same journalist, Nigel Morris, the deputy Political Editor, re-hash the same story across the i and the broadsheet, added with a bit more detail. Recycled news is always a joy. Though they give an affordable price for a brief read, but it is just something less of journalistic principals, overall. In saying this, as I browse through the Independent, which is a fair newspaper, it still suffers a problem. It is all text and way to blotchy for readers. I can handle a broadsheet, but all broadsheets lose out to tabloids because it is so jam packed and seemingly contrived and this is what suffers the industry.

The i is a good, short read to battle that problem for a soundbite, but it’s all a bit convoluted. Not enough of the info to back it up is presented. Yet it needs minimal text to remain a strong paper. Hire Me.

Though I did find one article by Philip Hensher. Iceland is banning porn. Should we follow?

“The world is out there and much of it thinks and lives pornographically, and is never far from a pornographic gaze. The ugly, demeaning of human beings came in through the enlightened conviction that it was no longer for politicians to control what people could say, write or depict.”

Answer? No. We should not follow this practice. One, we are independent. Two, we can handle issues credibly, with intent and necessity. It just happens to fall to the fact that politicians do not do their job, understand real people’s issues and the growing trend of porn. We’ll have more later on this, but porn is a form of release, can be healthy and encourage people to get on with their lives. Many pompous, obnoxious, stern faced politicians and people who follow a 1950’s approach to life and a “no sex please, were British” mentality don’t “live in the real world.”  By the way a year or so ago, Virgin Media and the government stuck a deal to ban certain websites from its users. Consumers pay for their internet connections, of which they are being ripped off on with pricing, and now, in a place where almost everyone has seen or is watching harmlessly for their own needs is being reprimanded for it. Does this not breach terms of service? Paying for a service and having parts instantly cut when politicians so chose it?

The Independent, Sat

Argie Bargie!

Argentina's President Cristina Fernandez

Sunday’s story in The Sun on Argentina’s bitter battle of words for the Falklands Island to return to Argentinian territory. The Argentine”s were accused of “making stuff up” by Governour Nigel Haywood, “Argentina just makes stuff up like, “It’s a disputed territory and the UN has already said that the Islanders don’t have a right to decide.” Previously reported before, residents of the Falklands have been reported, and if true, to be happy with British law governing the Isle. Argentine president, Cristina Kirchner has been aggressively fighting for the islands to return as “Britain should hand them back.”

The answer is clear. When war occurs and territories are taken, it is then government by those country bodies, akin to colonisation. Under UK governance, the islands are not in any danger or threat and the nationalistic ideals of the president who is constantly being seen as some ranter who wants and ideal Argentina, is putting her country at risk once again with separating their society. If the Argies ever attempt to re-capture by military force, they would be highly absent minded and need to find a diplomatic approach as well as understand that the country is not under any threat and spreading propagandist theories around is a toxic charge that loses all credibility. Leave them as they are and get on with supporting the country and its residents.

IMAGES

HM Treausry

Huffington Post UK

BBC

The Guardian