BBC GE 2015 Debate: Austerity Must Go!

Second Leaders debate with BBC: five leaders, one chicken

and an absent whining baby

ff bbc debate copy

During the Election debates on the BBC in the second of special debate programmes leading into the General Election 2015 for the UK, five of the seven main party leaders participated.

They were Ed Miliband (Labour), Nicola Sturgeon (SNP), Leanne Wood (Plaid Cymru), Natalie Bennett (Green) and Nigel Farage (UKIP).

Live-Election-Debate

Sitting leader of the country David Cameron (Conservative) previously issued an ultimatum to broadcasters and snubbed their offer, dictating to them he must not participate. They also added that the leader Nick Clegg (Liberal Democrats) not appear. Deputy Prime Minister Clegg did not turn up, despite having his own mind, supposedly. He claims the Conservatives, also known as Tory’s, secretly blocked him from appearing afraid he would reveal all the dodgy secrets of the Tory party over the last 5 years involving immense systemic abuse. Cameron also demanded he not be upstaged with ’empty chairs or podiums’ on the set. They were not used by the BBC and only 5 podiums were on display with the appearing leaders.

The debate focused on many issues and covered a lot of ground in an hour and a half with all leaders looking impressive in their own right, even if disagreeable. Cameron and Clegg looked like fools, sitting at home using responses to try and win in pre-fabricated statements made in advance alongside the biased press backdoor deals. They also sent statements online, which proved they were still involving themselves in the debate, which is shambolic to avoid.

Took bold choice to debate among absent dictators.

Took bold choice to debate among absent dictators.

Nicola Sturgeon and Ed Miliband agreed on multiple issues, but were divided over a coalition pact for now. This may change as the country expects a likely coalition government due to the changing nature of politics since Cameron sold out with Clegg in 2010 after failing to get elected. Labour leader Ed Miliband wanted to take his chances at gaining a majority in the election. Should this fail, SNP’s Sturgeon is offering a deal for the benefit of the country to rid the country of the evil totalitarian Tory governmental corruptions and abuses with austerity.

Also in the debate, a shockingly surprise move came from Nigel Farage, who seemed open to Labour at one point, launched an unprovoked attack which has cost the UKIP leader dearly. Without Cameron or Clegg, Farage attempted to be Alpha Male of politics and sideline Miliband. Farage failed to understand the only way to be electable from a political perspective is to join with them to get their ‘foot in the door’ and build politicians by 2020. Rebuffing this idea, Farage could eventually peter-out and lose his stead by 2020. It made UKIP lose its position of common sense to utter delusion and nonsense political play.

Green Party leader Natalie Bennett also opposed austerity as did Leanne Wood. Both put in good statements but failed to follow through effectively on plans fuller to make enough impact by trying to simply ruffle feathers which contradicted their own policies somewhat in part.

Green Leader Natalie Bennett put in another credible performance, but needs the extra mile push.

Green Leader Natalie Bennett put in another credible performance, but needs the extra mile push.

Though Sturgeon clashed with Farage over immigration as UKIP’s one key central policy, to abandon the EU to solve immigration, was Farage’s only bargaining chip for votes, sinking like a lead balloon. Farage failed to be comprehensive and at one point verbally attacked the audience of specially chosen voters by an independent panel/company unaffiliated with politics or the broadcasters. Chair of the debate David Dimblebee also pointed this out. He called the BBC left wing standards, after which the audience, under fire, did not appreciate.

For years the BBC had been led by ex-Conservative politicians who abused their position of political neutrality by offering biased news reports daily to favour Conservatives. It also hid multiple scandals over the years, including the infamous Paedophile scandal involving Sir Jimmy Savile, closely affiliated with Conservative governments and given access to abuse and rape children in hospitals and on sets at the BBC. The BBC workers admitted it was told to “turn a blind eye” when seeing Savile accost his victims on set and in his dressing room.

The BBC is funded by the taxpayer, the public, to produce content in their name, which is under scrutiny for failing to be of political neutrality.

David Cameron, ever the opportunist for a public statement, carefully edited and presented, said of the debates it was “part of the deal that was done to unblock the log-jam about TV debates” and was “delighted that I played a role unblocking that log-jam”. He said all participants in it were arguing to “abandon the plan that has turned this country around and has got us more jobs, more livelihoods and more business”. Mr.Cameron only joined in ONE debate with, as all seven leaders, hoping they would take the heat off of his tough questioning on ruining the country in the last five years. He has been urged to join in all debates to which Cameron has snubbed so he doesn’t look bad as he feels he cannot publicly defend his non-achieving five year term in office. He continues to control state media and news broadcasters in his favour.

Cameron has failed to meet one pledge of his many made in 2010-2015 and everyone has been a personal one to him, offering no democratic value to the people who may have voted for him in 2010.

Ed Miliband once again offered Cameron the chance to join in and debate him one on one, which the supposed leader of the country said was over and done with.

Farage looked like he was picking fights, but did try to be the one who ‘spoke about the stuff people won’t speak of.’ (Which is actually what FalseFabs is doing.) Farage also chose to follow up on his first debates’ controversial comments about health tourism involving HIV treatment. He said immigrants came to get diagnosed and receive up to £25,000 worth of drugs to help. The public did not buy his demonstrations, as they put it.

Controversial. Farage in trouble loose HIV explanation again.

Controversial. Farage in trouble loose HIV explanation again.

One important stat to also explain is that in London alone, an average of roughly 20,000 men were quietly diagnosed with HIV, both gay and straight in 2010-2015 under the coalition government (Conservative and Liberal Democrats). This demonstrates how many people society and David Cameron have truly failed in ‘brushing it under the carpet’ to look good. They do not plan to do anything further.

Bennett made strong cases but didn’t back up enough impact this time around. She offered jobs, climate change and public services to be saved. She challenged the public to “change the establishment.”

Sturgeon outlined the end of Austerity and to get the country moving again with a communal aspect of society, which was welcomed by many.

Miliband also came out on top with Sturgeon over protecting the country from threats, helping working families and look after the young members of society growing up in middle age from 30 onwards. Miliband has also been a key champion in protecting the vital NHS health service, which the Tories plan to privatise.

Strong, bold and feisty. Sturgeon on fine form outlining austerity end for honest British people.

Strong, bold and feisty. Sturgeon on fine form outlining austerity end for honest British people.

Wood may have been an extra on stage, but pressed hard on issues to show no pushover, well. The problem was she chose the wrong targets and couldn’t feasibly back up those claims.

After the debate the Tory party were given full stage support and not pressing on any statements over the TV debate even though their leader failed to join.

Any one party or leader who does not appear on a political TV debate scheduled for the General Election which requires the public votes from the electorate is shambolic and no politician has the right to tamper with bribing officials. The fact Cameron has done so means he should be struck off from being elected AND the party represented (Conservative) should be relegated from this year’s election as candidates.

May need to be called in to deal with totalitarian rule tampering with democratic process.

May need to be called in to deal with totalitarian rule tampering with democratic process.

It is unacceptable totalitarian Nazism rule which NO leader has the right to alter in a democratic process as the electorate need to hear the voices that are eligible for voting. No one has issued the policy and The Queen, who can develop a Royal Charter can, but has failed to do so, for her country. She is said to be a heavy Tory supporter and affects her political neutrality. She is also David Cameron’s cousin and meets him weekly for discussions, which affects her and Cameron’s position in office. She should make it law now. If she fails, then it should be imposed by Lord Neuberger and the Supreme Court imminently.

Child has had enough of Cameron as he tries another PR attempt before last fortnights debates.

Child has had enough of Cameron as he tries another PR attempt before last fortnights debates.

No-one politician should be allowed to abuse the system for political gain and like all ruling elites must be held to account. Should Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II need to do one last important act for her country, this would be it. Now is her time. Many regard her as a useless Monarch who only sits on a gold chair and does nothing but pocket salary from Tory handouts, which gave her extra income over the last five years also.

Should do something for her country.

Should do something for her country.

We are not Hitler’s children and the Cameron Youth Movement must not be allowed to interfere with the political spectrum under any circumstance in a democratic process. If politicians fail to act, then other institutions must intervene as soon as possible. Everyone else in the country is held to account except politicians and there is no excuse for tinkering with political injustice.

Cameron also famously hired ex-editor and biased spin doctor Andy Coulson, the first convicted criminal in the halls of Westminster Parliament as Head of Communications. He served a six month jail sentence, which included hacking a dead child’s phone for a news story, leading parents to believe the child was alive to access the messages.

IMAGES

BBC

The Mirror

The Guardian

The Independent

Daily Mail

Daily Record

Advertisements

Phone Hacking scandal finds Andy Coulson guilty

Ex-editor and David Cameron’s Head of Communications found guilty of Phone Hacking. Partner Brooks cleared of all charges.

 

After years of the fallout from the phone hacking scandal which saw scores of celebrities and members of the general public, including a murdered teen used for information revealed a court verdict yesterday.

coulson brooks

It was revealed that David Cameron’s now ex-spin doctor, (Head of Communications) Andy Coulson, who the Prime Minister hired after his time from leaving the newspaper to a government aide was convicted. Coulson was found guilty by jury of a number of charges (listed below) after hacking confidential material of others. They included a murdered schoolgirl by the name of Milly Dowler. By accessing the information, the family were led to believe the deceased girl had used her phone and was still alive, when, in reality, she lay in a shallow grave.

At party together.

At party together.

The chilling verdict found him guilty of plotting to hack phones and are considering further charges of conspiring to commit misconduct in a public office. He now face jail terms as well. Coulson had a six year long secret affair with the editor of the paper conducting the hacking, now defunct Sunday newspaper News of The World. The sister paper of The Sun was later replaced by the Sun on Sunday.

Tory cabinet ministers and leader of the country David Cameron, who were warned at the time but arrogantly decided against public outroar said they were “extremely sorry” for his employment at Downing Street whilst trying to turn popularity from their neglectful decisions.

Shameful. Having tea with Dowler family in attempts to smooth over grief.

Shameful. PR PM having tea with Dowler family in attempts to smooth over grief.

Speaking in 2011, scandal ridden Conservative party leader Cameron said that if Coulson “”knew about the hacking at the News of the World, he will not only have lied to me, but he will have lied to the police, to a select committee, to the Press Complaints Commission and, of course, perjured himself in a court of law”.

Cameron once left his underage daughter in a pub after inviting the media to take ‘unknown’ pictures for press attention. A car soon returned to pick up the forgotten girl. The Tories are said to be bending the law in favour to gain mother’s votes at general elections.

The jury of eight women and three men decided to clear editor Rebekah Brooks, who many firmly believe was ‘in on it’ with Coulson, including their torrid working affair. Brooks, who rubbed shoulders with David Cameron, The Queen, Rupert Murdoch and others had strong connections and denied any knowledge or wrongdoing over the scandal. Other reporters and colleagues were cleared of the questionable charges.

After press campaigns of a public jury, the decision has now been met with upset. Insiders feel Brooks got away with it because she was a ‘woman’ and had jury sympathy. Her legal team was represented by David Cameron’s brother, who is a barrister. Brooks was said to have collapsed upon hearing the verdict and needed to be helped out of court by officials.

The jury are since considering a verdict on the remaining material until 11 June.

leveson

Since the case was revealed the now sketchy Leveson inquiry was launched to report on press ethics. Lord Justice Leveson laid out numerous suggestions on regulatory practices with media ethics to the press. The press regulation debacle, which drew up a Royal Charter in secret nd failed to display the ‘contract’ to the public domain and simply added it to the records as a doctrine of law was deemed inaccurate by all the press. Since then no press newspaper has willingly supported nor signed to the Charter, despite The Independent’s inclinations towards doing so before selling the paper off.

It is important that the press retain self-regulation, though must reform attitude to press ethic reporting based on attacking with political ideology and ‘free for all’ onslaughts of non-public figures. Adding a little taste to non public figures who make the news should be endorsed.

The press continue to favour self-regulation and press freedom. With the recent Egyptian Journalist jailings for seven years for doing their job and wrongly branded as supporting terrorist organisations for reporting responsible in a democratic society, journalists are needed now more than ever. Any level of regulation is a strain on the industry and its workforce. If politicians do not like what is reported. Mainly to cover up their dirty secrets, most notably the Tories, they should grow a thicker skin.

queen signing

If you do not like the reporting of your misdeeds when it is responsible, then don’t be corrupt. It is fundamental to hold all ruling elites to account with responsible journalism. Since then celebrity gossip and sex scandals of footballers, classed as trash, have been gracing front covers, causing a chilling effect on journalism as a whole. Protecting the government abuses is not what the tool of the press is and any attempt to regulate the law from ministers in future to hide such scandals should be rejected by the court and only allow independent bodies, judges or Head of State to consider changing the rules. Cameron has been changing the laws in secret since 2010 to this point and has restricted press reporting. The evil totalitarian leader plans to further attack Human Rights, online spaces and welfare claimants to protect big business and scandals.

Being this out of touch with Europe, the world and its own country is a shameful disgrace that undermines Parliament, the UK and the judicial system. After Home Office Secretary previously stated “Human Rights must be scrapped” with the European Union support, the UK is becoming a shambolic authorative dictatorship. The courts may have to intervene and stop governments abusing the rules. Perhaps the Tory Queen can do something right by her country for once and protect what was once one of the greatest nation states for Human Rights, ethics and Democracy in an already problematic world.

We’re saying nothing about the heavy rumour from insiders regarding the ‘keys in the fishbowl’ party with the Cam’s George Osborne, Boris Johnson, Brooks, her husband and Coulson, among others. Though many believe it true, amid tense speculation.

IMAGES

Vanity Fair

The Telegraph

jcwi.org

Free Media

The Staggering Cost Of One Man’s Delusions: £25 Billion Squandered On Bungled Welfare Reforms

Very informative re-blog on vicious welfare reforms from sadist minister and failed Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith.

the void

iain-duncan-smithThe recent report from the Major Projects Authority, which revealed that Universal Credit is such a fucking disaster they had to invent a whole new category to describe it, also laid bare the astronomical cost of Iain Duncan Smith’s welfare reforms.

Just under £11 billion is budgeted to be squandered on some of the DWP’s largest projects, and that figure doesn’t include Universal Credit.  The cost of this hare-brained experiment is shrouded in mystery now it has been classed as ‘reset’, but last year the Major Projects Authority reported that the bill would reach £12.8 billion.

Even this is far from the whole story.  Community Work Placements, the latest mass workfare scheme, will cost almost a third of a billion.  The costs of other Jobcentre schemes, such as Mandatory Work Activity, are not included in the above figures.  At the very least the budgeted costs of welfare reform exceed…

View original post 485 more words

Maria Miller: The CONservative fraudster

Conservative politician Maria Miller, 50, has been the focus of recent media controversy over the past couple of weeks. After secretly trying to make further, newer restrictions on the fabric of a free press unclouded by disingenuous laws restricting reporting, Miller was found to be scandalous. Her crime was that of abusing the British taxpayer among many others becoming the newest addition to the expenses scandal.

Maria Miller

The Right Honourable Maria Miller

The Expenses Scandal, which occurred in 2009 was that of a number of politicians, many senior, and mostly Conservatve (Tory) party MPs, seeing ministers fill in forms to claim expenses for items they bought. These ranged from the lowly 89p items to hundreds of thousands of pounds. Reclaimed and not paid from their own pay packets, the ministers were living it up. Then they were eventually caught by the national press, who all exposed the scandal.

Since then ministers have said to have been looking for a reason to control the press from their heavy reporting, often shaming the scandalous politicians rightfully on the front pages.

In 2012, after the phone hacking inquiry, a new Press Regulation report was established and finished after years of recommendations by Lord Justice Leveson, dubbed the Leveson Report. Since then ministers, especially Tory ones, to which all of the national press politically support except for two brands, (The Mirror and The Guardian) said they would never regulate the press. Shortly after, David Cameron, the leader of the Tories decided to revoke that pledge and clamp down on the press. Aiming to make the opposition leaders of the Labour and Liberal Democrats take the blame, the press were disgraced with the decision once it was decided they would place tougher attempts from self-regulation onto journalists.

Ministers were then said to look for tougher details in clamping down. Behind the scenes, Maria Miller, the newly appointed Culture, Media and Sport secretary (which has had a troublesome scandal involvement with every minister in the role since 2010) was allegedly acting in secret. Aiming to re-regulate the already regulated from Leveson reporting press, she is now seeking tougher restrictions to gag the media further. When also questioned by watchdog’s about her expenses abuse, Miller threatened them behind the scenes to keep them quiet. Aiming to shroud her details of scandalous lifestyle in secrecy even further, Miller is now using the preposterous excuse that she is being “witchunted” by the press out of revenge for the Leveson regulation. Miller, who is still seeking a second batch of regulation to this day, is now using this mantle to twist the screw into her favour as a victim. Anything that the press now writes, she will attempt to sully as uncredible and abusive, somewhat of an irony to Miller, who has acted out the exact double standard.

They often say, those who say something about someone is actually drawing on a reflection of themselves. This seems to be the case. Miller wasn’t finished there either. She continued to attack media outlets involving television news stations who were doing their journalistic job.

miller 2

Shamed. Miller makes speedy getaway in car.

Miller had received numerous requests to stand down and leave parliamentary office for her scandal. She defiantly refused. Leader of the country David Cameron, her party leader also, said that Miller “had paid back the money” and is continuing to now “get on” with her job and shamefully excused her behaviour with the notion that we should “draw a line under it” in reference to the scandalous corruption on offer. Miller paid back a measly £6,000 which is practically pocket money to her. If any other lower class citizen did such scandal they would be fired and leave on no income. Instead, Miller, who earns a whopping £65,000 increased by 11% to £75,000 per annum by 2015 as a sitting MP, which makes her a somewhat of a millionaire, remains in the job. On Thursday 3 March, she issued a hurried, thirty second apology on the advice of someone who told her to. Her insincere apology was not of her own accord. The following week on Tuesday 8 March she wrote another note of her antics in her local paper. Miller, who decided to write it in her local paper rather than in public to the world, attempted to gain more support from a writing piece and pocketed even more cash.

Sadistic welfare minister and failed Tory leadership candidate Iain Duncan Smith was grilled on the same day. He advised Miller was being “witchunted” and dodged the question about conning the system. Duncan Smith, who inherited his fortunes through his family, including two homes, is responsible for viciously removing poor people with no money, job prospects or employability skills including sick and Paralympic athletes unfairly from the pocket money benefit aiming to help support people getting back to work or healthy. They earn around £70 every two weeks. Politicians earn £65,000 rising to £77,000 a year, not including expenses claims.

If a welfare claimant is “decided” ‘fit to work’ by the unjustifiable measures to remove people from welfare to get numbers down and label them as workshy as David Cameron called them all “workers and the shirkers” when many are ill or poor, they will be sanctioned, removed from benefits for three years and possibly face a prison sentence under a case of fraud. Politicians, however, are allowed to get back on with the job and say no more with a ‘slap on the wrist’ tender talking to. And they say totalitarianism is dead.

David Cameron at the Ulster Unionist Party conference

If Maria Miller had any self respect and humility she would step down, repay the thousands to millions owed and apologise properly on a nation TV stage with a sincere, and not pre-advised from PR friends choice in doing so. This will be the only way Miller may be able to ascertain any honour left in her disgraced run as Culture Secretary and an MP in general. She should stop attempting to blame the press for doing their job, something which Miller has failed to do herself. Trying to attack the press with further regulation would be a mistake and she should drop this. To make it clear, she should make a statement clarifying she will not be regulating the press and allow the Leveson Report to stand as the sole beneficiary to this ideal. If she continues to attack the press, this would be unwise. She will become exposed (through her own fault) of corruption. This is not a press being vengeful. This is their professional job and conduct to the sector respected. Why would she need to re-regulate it? It proves she has many more demons in her closet and could possibly be planning to claim on expenses once again without a second thought. She needs to take a step back and re-assess.

millerr

There is no way dithering weed David Cameron will sack her. The only reason she kept her job was because she is the second only woman in the Conservative Party alongside Theresa May, which neither female minister has shone a light on a glorious and dignified run in the cabinet positions they have held since 2010. They further taint the female position of politician. By choosing not to sack her, Cameron, who does not want to appear weak and keep his best friends in the jobs with him to his little fan club, who also protect his policies, instead disgraces the political spectrum as shameful. In doing so Cameron and the Tories are once again a corrupt bunch of totalitarian rulers who disgrace the halls of Westminster and all the great Politicians before them. How on Earth did it get to this? The electorate, or people who vote as it is commonly called, further see this insulting and untrustworthy to Politicians who fiddle the figures to own self gain.

All in all, any attempt to hide a secret will only ever become bigger and more explosive when the truth eventually outs, as it always does. To hide such details will only prompt journalists to expose the truth. This is not a witchunt. This is a journalist’s job. And if you chose to clamp down on their professional job description, even further since original press regulation, not only are the ministers destroying the job a journalist can do, they are also breaking their own law. At this point it should be the courts who may have to intervene on the politicians and have them overruled for corruption and disruption to the professional sector of a job, in this case journalism. The same applies to all positions in working sectors. Not even a politician is allowed to change a job description or remove them from the public sphere because politicians are childish babies that do not like to hear anything bad about them when they put their feet out of line. No one is above the law and it is a journalist’s job first and foremost to hold all to account, including ruling elites. This is a further endorsement to the electorate that the Democratic nation of Great Britain has been constantly turned into a totalitarian United Kingdom under far right wing extremism with nationalism as its key function.

Written as of 8th March 2014.

 

UPDATE from 9 March 2014

On Wednesday, 9 March 2014, Maria Miller chose to resign of her own accord. David Cameron today disgraced the Houses of Parliament further by continually choosing to attack opposition leader Ed Miliband where Miliband said it was “his job to sack ministers” should they break the law. Cameron traded vicious spats of assault claiming Miliband, just like the rest of the British public were, “jumping on a political bandwagon” in order to blame Labour once more for all of the Conservative scandals. This is the government in place. A corrupt, self serving, abusive batch of friends who then excuse their behaviour as justified. Anyone else is vilified and disgraced instead.

Once again, ruling elites prove they can get away with fraudulent and criminal activity. The average commoner, would serve years imprisonment and never likely to receive a respectful job title ever again.

The UK public believe Cameron has handled the crisis badly by 2/3 in an itvnews poll supported by Comres research. It also proved the public trust politicians less at 49% tied with behaving badly.

Cameron continues to defiantly disagree and argue that Miller had done absolutely nothing wrong. Morally wrong, the Conservatives are seen as a party that abuses, fiddles the details for themselves and smears opposition where possible. Anything they disagree with is decided and no responsibility is taken. This is another shameful disgrace that tarnishes the greatness of this beautiful country which is a big player in democratic rights, formerly known from 2010 as Great Britain.

saji

As of 10 March 2014, Sajid Javid was ushered into the position of Culture Secretary amid Miller’s resignation. Javid is a ‘working class’ politician who worked his way up, sources say. Of Pakistani origin and former Economy Secretary once again the Tory party have been accused of playing favourites with Cameron’s personal choices of loyalty to him. A poster boy to try to connect with voters as ‘ordinary’ and involved in the economy, many believe this is simply bureaucratic quota reaching. Cameron pledged since 2010 he would have 40% of female ministers which has monumentally failed.  Many still believe Javid is, as everyone before him including Miller and the also scandal ridden, now Health Secretary, Jeremy Hunt, as unqualified for the position. The general election, in May 2015, is where the Tories are focusing on gaining a ‘working class vote’ to be re-elected after a failed majority in 2010.

Miller is still not being placed into the criminal justice system to face charges of fraud highlighting that politicians can break the law under Her Majesty’s ‘Secret State’. Simply put, she got away with it. You wouldn’t. She had two homes, two children and a husband, who is a solicitor.

IMAGES

Lafucina

The Guardian

Daily Mail

Getty Images

Huffington Post

The Telegraph

The EU Deabte, IN or OUT?

Should the United Kingdom remain in the European Union?

ebate eu

On Wednesday the second of debates involving leaders of two big parties in the political spectrum went onto the television podium this week. After last week’s BBC radio debate the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) leader Nigel Farage took on Liberal Democrats leader Nick Clegg.

This debate was centralised on the subject of remaining as a part of the European Union or EU as its commonly known. With Clegg supporting IN and Nigel hoping to be OUT the other leaders of parties weren’t invited. After a General election is coming in 2015 to elect who will lead the country Conservative leader David Cameron has chosen not to sign up to the debates for months being scared of losing after his totalitarian ways involving vicious cuts, abuse and protection of rich friends. Ed Miliband of the Labour Party, who does want the debates was not invited either. David Cameron after the debates chose to critise the debate opinions to favour his own ideologies by not participating and then critisising from the sidelines. Cameron, whose special advcsors is Linton Crosby, classed as a dangerous man, tells Cameron what might benefit him long term. Cameron is also scared to face the music in the debates as all their leaders signed up to. The electorate are not stupid to see this corrupt little man squirming around to protect his abusive ways which has included unproven yet indirect murders of suicidal teens and people struggling with welfare cuts, sanctions and homelessness. He has also called for more deaths of badgers in a crack down on tuberculosis without any scientific evidence that the non predetory mammals cause the disease.

After Nigel began the debate strong with his passionate sound and wiping the floor with bumbling Clegg, Nigel had a tough point made with the audience. He claimed their had now been a “white working underclass” as a result of the EU powers altering Britain’s landscape. While this is true in part, Nigel and his army of fans turned to upset. They did not know how to take or accept that claim. The difference is it is true, but is a ‘do not mention’ detail to which Farage will mention and will gain votes for because no one likes the truth and it must be told. Though this is one of Farage’s main policies fuelling the EU OUT debate, Farage, like Cameron is handling it all wrong. This is not necessarily the EU’s fault alone, either.

The fact that if we had all jobs available or created tomorrow, it would take months to fill them with ridiculous form filling. Secondly, those jobs would be filled with unskilled, talentless or unsuitable to their skills positions. Just because a nurse can fix things does not means he/she would be exceptional in the role of mechanic, or vice versa. Someone who has business acumen or is capable or running their own and contributing long term to economy is not best suited to sitting on a till and scanning barcodes. It is crucial to place people in the correct working skillset of jobs. Which then highlights that Britain has no skilled positions and places people in any old dead end job to ‘get the numbers down’ and does not pay enough to live in an over extortionate capitalist country where only the rich and David Cameron profit from.

With Cameron’s failed personal policies in Europe and charging through the front door with demands has ruined the reputation of Britain. As one of Europe’s biggest and essential players at the table, we may need to renegotiate powers and be allowed to do so. With bailouts, support and many other things Britain doesn’t get credit for because of David Cameron, we need to handle certain controls. This is purely down to the fact, in the Immigration case, for example, that we cannot simply house many more. It is not because we have a xenophobic approach to migrants who we accept in many differing cases.

Map of Europe, of which Britain is a part of by land mass location.

Map of Europe, of which Britain is a part of by land mass location.

The influx however has caused employers to change the salary of job positions and hire cheap migrants so that they do not have to pay what someone is fully worth. We’ll have more on immigration and zero hours contracts at a later date.

As Nigel added we need to maintain our pound, negotiate toll numbers and support the now white working underclass. If we do this, and as a part of Europe, we can then help to stabilise Europe even further. There can be no denying that we are officially a European country. With so much connection from the EU also, it is crucial to connect with Britain favourably. It would be ideal if European countries could understand this. One man (Cameron) is not the full representation of a full nation that is Britain.

Though with Nigel’s ‘solution’ to give lower class jobs won’t be a ‘get rich quick’ answer. As mentioned above, the job market is hopeless at its current stage which is why is it necessary to have a welfare system in place, which Cameron wants to viciously destroy in 2015, even announcing he would start by stopping all under 25s claiming benefits.

With nothing “made in Britain” and a clueless leader of the country dithering and grabbing his hands on the first thing that comes his way to say will save us whilst looking into a publicity camera documenting his entire game face for votes, Britain will fail once more.

Farage also added he is interested in Fracking. We’ll have another debate on this at a later stage also. Though the basis for this is counterproductive. As the only nation in the world which doesn’t suffer natural disasters including Earthquakes and Tsunami’s, Fracking will rupture the plates under the Earth\s crust and kill us all. The greed for Cameron’s energy friends and not the common people will suffer as always. How much will the clean up bill be? He also wanted nuclear favour as Cameron has beforehand. When the debate finished, to which most policies Cameron agrees with, the Tory leader said off camera Farage was “wrong” in an attempt to play games with a cheap shot.

Cameron was under hot water from Farage too, who blasted the wishy washy country ‘leader’ for revoking the Lisbon Treaty which Cameron said once he was willing to tear up, as it were. Once again, as he did to get elected in 2010, Cameron lied.

Clegg said we should remain in the EU to protect jobs here and overseas if we chose to migrate. Adding that the economic recovery, which isn’t great will the Tories are fiddling the figures as soon as it comes out is suffering. Chancellor George Osborne of the tories has cast over-projections unmet and raised the deficit three times as much as Labour and lost the AAA credit rating for Britain downgrading to a AA instead.

Having trade deals whether in or out is available, but these are most beneficial as a part of the EU. It will also give us quicker contacts and connections to understand that even if you dislike a country, you can still trade with them at a reasonable price.

Using the notion of Democracy from Farage, he claimed we would get this back by leaving. Let’s be clear. This is a scaremongering tactic. It won’t regain Democracy. Britain is and has been one since being in the EU, regardless. Therefore, being in the EU makes no difference to losing a Democracy as we still have one in place. The threat to Democracy itself is the abuse form the Tory party revoking welfare, legal aid and human rights as just some of many totalitarian policies implemented to crush the lower, working and poor classes. Nothing in Britain works because of these abuses to suit the rich, fragmenting society to its very core. no one cares anymore, and why should they? What is their to be responsible about if politicians are changing the rules to fit their corruption on a daily basis? Then you will receive a visit from the Gestapo or police as many call them here telling you to be quiet and put the frighteners on you.

cameron

Failure. British ‘leader’ David Cameron.

Farage ended his debate by adding he wanted to trade with India, to which Britain ploughs millions in to support them (which has troubling views on women as third rate citizens and often involved with rape scandals) and New Zealand who stand alone. Of course a handful of people don’t make a full nation but it is a fact of which we cannot argue. Clegg said we should not adopt the Nigel Farage mentality of “Fantasy” regarding the “shun of the modern world. Women stay at home, gay abuse, climate change ignored.” He added Britain had and was “Compassion, diverse, not fantasy. Protect the Britain that we love.”

As a member of Europe or not, we would still be a nation of Eurovision. Though this could be a serious line of jeapody. Isn’t that the biggest reason to remain? Jokes aside, more serious problems are at stake here.

Leaving the EU will be disastrous. No one likes any form of war and should avoid this at all possibilities, yet is is sadly something that for many can be inevitable in time. With Cameron previously spouting of more terrorist attacks after he put us into further Unnecessary conflict we are more at risk. Without going to war with European allies (we are not warmongers, only Cameron, who wanted to go to the Syrain catastrophe from oil stakes) it is important to protect Europe (of which we are) as ourselves. It is about keeping the world as peaceful as it can be, despite alternate issues in countries around the world. Where possible, everything should be upheld to keep the land of every nation stable and supportive, regardless of conflicting political views.

Nations will need to lear to ‘get along’ despite disputes. Think of the economic value if nothing else and strive for that if you dislike others. as for the transition of powers, do not give into Cameron yet. Have policies on the sidelines ready but launch them in 2015, when Cameron is booted out of office as leader of the United Kingdom. Until then, don’t give him anything. But do give us some more points in Eurovision to re-establish communication and connection to remain IN and economically stable trade with other nations.

clegg farage

In the long run, we should stay IN the EU than OUT of it. With our trade, economy, being able to migrate ourselves to Europe in the distress of Britain and contributing to overseas economies, we will be stronger together. Being alone is further isolation and not productive. We my not like the growing bill of the EU, but it is a group of which we are a part of. We cannot simply throw our toys out of the pram because of Cameron’s failures to represent us well. It is the job of a politician to smooth over relations and communication to a greater goal among differening ideologies. Cameron has once again failed this and proved he is not doing his job. Adding to this, the young kids who travel to hotspots like Malia, Crete, Kavos and Sunny Beach, you won’t be able to travel abroad so easily and have extortionate prices raises on holidays abroad, to which the EU allows us to have to leave such stress for multiple periods. Remember kids, you have a vote. Use it. This will be the only time you get your say and the only way politicians listen to common folk.

Just like you voted for Cameron under false pretences, do not be convinced of a ‘get rich quick’ solution. This is going to take time. If we leave the EU we will be putting ourselves back another generation. If Cameron had any sense he would retract the vote or admit he was “misinformed” of the situation and feels it better to stay at this economic time.

So, in a nutshell, we must stay. You are voting for the policy, not the person. Clegg has the correct implementation. Farage has the points. We can achieve the points by being IN.

IMAGES

BBC

UK Weather World

 

NHS Patient records to be viewed by anyone. Must opt-out TODAY only!

In exclusive details passed to us by an anonymous source, the NHS are set to launch a electronic shift of all patient information to a database called SPINE, without informing the public.

Under the Health and Social Care act, your patient records will be available to ANYONE to read including pharmacists and receptionists not medically trained.

health_and_social_care_button_copy

In a spineless move by the UK government, all patient details will be uploaded to the secret database WITHOUT consent from patients in order to keep tabs on their medical histories.

Patients are able to “opt out” of the initiative by the end of OCTOBER 2013. (That’s by today.)

The government have kept these initiatives to peruse private information of medical records as a secret from all national press and have not informed the public, either.

wpid-norman-lamb-rex-features

Spineless. Conservative Health Secretary Norman Lamb.

How to opt out

Head to your GP (General Practitioner/Doctor) and hand in a letter detailing you wish to opt out. Many templates can be found at this website with numerous formats available.

http://www.thebigoptout.com/opt-out-letter/

A template of the text, added here, can be used below. (Add the address and date at the top right of corner)

—————————————————————————–

Exercising right to opt out

Dear Doctor,

As you are probably aware, the Government is intending to ask you to transfer the electronic medical records of your patients onto a national database called the “spine”. They intend you to do this without first seeking the consent of your patients. It is BMA policy that patients should give their individual consent prior to their information being transferred on to the national database.

There are substantial concerns about the privacy and confidentiality of information transferred onto the national database, not least because promised software security safeguards called “sealed envelopes” will not be in place and because the patient’s instructions with regard to who may access the records can be overridden. I do not believe that such a large database, with so many staff users, can be regarded as secure.

I would be grateful if you would ensure that none of my records held by you are entered onto the national system.  Would you please also file or scan a copy of this letter in my records and also record my dissent by entering the “Read code” – ‘93C3. – Refused consent for upload to national shared electronic record.’ into my computer record. I am aware of the implications of this request and will notify you should I change my mind.

This request is itself confidential. Please do not divulge my decision, in an identifiable manner, to anyone other than to clinicians who are providing care to me and who might otherwise place information about me on the national care records service.

To confirm, I do not wish for my details to be shared onto the system, by my GP’s under any circumstances and my confirmation should also be sought beforehand.

Further information for GPs is available online at http://www.TheBigOptOut.org/for_GPs

Yours sincerely,

———————————————

More information is available at the website for Health and Social Care Act. (Below)

http://www.firstpracticemanagement.co.uk/index.php/knowledge_base/general_information/health-and-social-care-information-centre-hscic/

More opt out details and ‘consequences of opting out’ are here –

http://www.thebigoptout.com/how-to-opt-out/

IMAGES

Highfield Humanities

Community Care

Rex Features