Tory Chairman Grant Shapps accused of biased editing of rivals public Wikipedia records
Conservative Party Chairman Grant Shapps, who also uses an alias as Michael Green to work in a second job, has been strongly accused of tampering with Wikipedia accounts of political rivals.
Fearing a loss at the General Election for his party, which have a track record over the last 5 years of scandal, deceit, corruption and cheating, Shapps/Green decided to change the accounts to display negative details of rivals.
An account was specifically linked back to Shapps, who has been using media over the same periods to bash oppositions with unbacked-up statements of smears, by Wikipedia and others.
Shapps who has been caught out, has publicly denied the reports, as usual. In another blow for the Tory party, publics continue to see it as liars, cheats and corruption at its finest for failing to be honest and hold hands up. But then, Shapps knows what he is doing is “morally wrong” and cannot defend the actions. Shapps adds someone may have acted on his behalf, including co-chairman of the Tories, on Shapps’ behalf. Therefore an admission that one of them has done so. As well as the fact that it was still under Shapps direction to do so. You really can’t make it up. The hole dug is getting very deep it would seem.
Leader of the Party and country, David Cameron, who loves to jump into a public statement on anything as it happens, has once again yet to comment on Shapps’ shady smearing. It is yet another scandal which seems to happen daily or weekly with almost every party member of the Tories today.
Mr Shapps, who has been involved in multiple scandals, the earliest over a rough six months, threatened legal action to someone who exposed his lies of working at a second job, whilst as party chair of the Conservatives. What a wimp.
The claims were dismisses, as journalists who did their job telling the truth, could not possibly face any bullying tactic to stand up in court, even if Shapps and his party lobby justice officials.
Earlier in 2012, the Daily Mail, among others, broke the story of a secret in-house affair of a senior Conservative official with another female party member. Both are married and highly praise adultery as sinful actions to Conservative values. There have been multiple scandals of cheating by scores of Tories, broken in the press, which none threatened with lacking legitimacy of legal action.
The party covered up the release of the people having the affair but everyone in journalistic circles is aware the adulterer is Mr Grant Shapps. Mr Cameron knew of the affair and while “stunned” agreed to cover it up.
We can reveal this as it is not ‘officially named in the press’ meaning that it is ‘allegedly’ an ‘opinion’ (one of truth) and cannot be legally contested no matter how much spin is placed. Of course, as well, since we know, but cannot publicly confirm or deny, this is clearly labelled as comment or opinion.
That’s the Tories for you though. Hide behind the state totalitarian system they created for themselves to penalise the truth and hard-working, moral, decent citizens of the United Kingdom.
Cheating is in the blood, it would seem. Mr Shapps has Conned his way to the Wikipedia pages and the Tory Party. Instead of being a weasel hiding behind lies, perhaps he could gain some respect, what’s left of it, by being honest and stop lying about his deceit. Throwing around the justice system as a tactic to quieten truth is a reprehensible act that undermines the legal profession and the public’s lacking access to the courts aswell.
Over the past five years, leader David Cameron imposed Legal Aid restrictions, meaning the middle class sector of families and citizens would not have access to legal representation. Either they must represent themselves in court, or pay costs for barristers.
Experts and insiders claim this is a strict violation of legal reform that prevents access to the justice system for people of the nation, an imperative that was created solely for all to have access to.
Those who are poor and may qualify for Legal Aid are usually given cheap or rubbish lawyers and already stigmatised as not able to put a good case together. They are also quietly judged on appearance and background as lowest of society, where judges already set them up for a loss of the case as a result.
One question also remains on the side of Wikipedia. How does it manage to report accurate information on its database, without allowing tampering of pages with lies? It could and probably should hire real editors, given the information to update by Wikipedia frontman Jimmy Wales. Or it could offer a rate of payment per article, or in bundle to update and alter pages correctly.
Currently Wikipedia, with low investment, allows anyone with an account to change/update pages. This has for years undermined the service as non-journalistic as a source of information. One question is certain. It cannot go on like that forever as a service, if it wants to be respected fully on it’s information gathering.
Political bodies, politicians or monetary services and donors in liaison with governments should not have access to such a platform for abuse.
Skeptic Wars / Blogspot